| Literature DB >> 26150893 |
Selma Dos Santos Melo1, Joel Estevão de Melo Diniz2, Jonilson Heslei Guimarães3, Josivan da Silva Costa4, Davi do Socorro Barros Brasil5, Sílvia Simone Dos Santos de Morais3, Daímio Chaves Brito3, José Carlos Tavares Carvalho4, Cleydson Breno Rodrigues Dos Santos4, Denilson Luz da Silva1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The increasing efforts to reduce the environmental impact on the Amazon's natural resources are focusing on watercourses that pass through effluents with high concentrations of heavy metals. The adsorption by absorbent is one of the methods used to remove metallic ions. In this assignment, the preparation of activated carbon from Brazil nut bark (Bertholletia excelsa l.), which is a waste material produced from the use of seeds in foodstuffs and cosmetics, is shown.Entities:
Keywords: Absorbent; Brazil nut; Thermal activation
Year: 2015 PMID: 26150893 PMCID: PMC4491886 DOI: 10.1186/s13065-015-0114-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Cent J ISSN: 1752-153X Impact factor: 4.215
Characterization of activated charcoal from Brazil-nut bark
| Properties | Results | Standart Deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Volatile material of charcoal (%) | 49.2823 | 3.6226 |
| Yield of charcoal (%) | 50.7176 | 3.6226 |
| Volatile material of activated carbon(%) | 71.8145 | 3.6389 |
| Yield of activated charcoal (%) | 28.1855 | 3.6389 |
| Moisture (%) | 8.0385 | 0.2154 |
| Ash (%) | 4.8475 | 0.0858 |
| Fixed carbon (%) | 23.3379 | 0.5813 |
| pH | 10.10 | 0.0141 |
| Real density (g cm-3) | 0.9556 | 0.0028 |
| Bulk Density (g cm-3) | 0.4728 | 0.0089 |
| Porosity (%) | 50.5209 | 0.9254 |
Characterization of area, volume e diameter of AC2
| Parameters | Mean Values f | Deviation |
|---|---|---|
| BET Specific Area - SBET (m2.g-1) | 464.835 | 9.7735 |
| Specific Area of a single point in P/P° - SP/P° (m2 .g-1) | 477.6824 | 0.2044 |
| Langmuir Specific Area- SLangmuir (m2 .g-1) | 619.9551 | 3.8205 |
| Pore volume - VP/P° (cm3 g-1) | 0.2561 | (-) |
| Accumulated volume of pores in the adsorption - VBJH-Ads (cm3 g-1) | 0.0662 | (-) |
| Accumulated volume of pores in desorption - VBJHDes (cm3 g-1) | 0.0731 | (-) |
| Mean pore diameter -D (nm) | 2.2031 | (-) |
| Mean pore diameter in adsorption - DBJH-Ads (nm) | 4.9227 | (-) |
| Mean pore diameter in desorption - DBJH-Des (nm) | 4.0695 | (-) |
Fig. 1Adsorption/desorption isotherm of N2 by AC2 at 77 K
Fig. 2Micrographs of AC2 taken by SEM. Highlighted squares indicate points for EDS
Fig. 3AC2 spectrum obtained by EDS
Chemical composition of AC2
| Elements | Point 1 | Point 2 | Point 3 | Point 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 66.446 | 69.008 | 69.872 | 70.754 |
| O | 17.614 | 16.86 | 18.163 | 16.515 |
| Mg | 0.352 | 0.414 | 0.327 | 0.269 |
| Si | 0.439 | 0.401 | 0.541 | 0.493 |
| S | 0.628 | 0.65 | 0.511 | 0.503 |
| K | 14.521 | 12.668 | 10.586 | 11.465 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Fig. 4X-Ray diffraction of AC2
Results of Boehm titration
| Functional groups | MASFGa (%) | Deviation |
|---|---|---|
| -COOH | 17.91 | 0.023 |
| -COOR | 3.62 | 0.037 |
| -OH | 78.48 | 0.003 |
aMASFG: mass of acidic surface functional groups
Fig. 5FTIR spectrum of AC2
The influence of pH on Cu (II) adsorption
| pH | A Ce(mg L-1) | B Ce(mg L-1) | Ce (mg L-1) | MSEa | Qe (mg g-1) | R (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.04 | 2.33 | 2.11 | 2.22 | 0.11 | 3.75 | 95.56 |
| 4.01 | 2.06 | 1.79 | 1.92 | 0.13 | 4.44 | 96.15 |
| 5.09 | 1.85 | 1.73 | 1.79 | 0.06 | 4.53 | 96.42 |
| 6.01 | 2.18 | 3.05 | 2.61 | 0.43 | 4.15 | 94.77 |
aMean standard error
Influence of AC2 diameter of the particles in the Cu (II) adsorption
| DIAMETER | A Ce (mg L-1) | B Ce(mg L-1) | Ce (mg L-1) | MSEa | Qe (mg g-1) | R (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D > 1.19 mm | 1.39 | 1.83 | 1.61 | 0.22 | 4.09 | 96.77 |
| 0.595 < D < 1.19 | 1.64 | 1.48 | 1.56 | 0.08 | 3.59 | 96.87 |
| D < 0.595 | 3.27 | 2.90 | 3.08 | 0.18 | 3.93 | 93.83 |
a Mean standard error
Influence of the contact time of AC2 in solution in Cu (II) adsorption
| T (min) | A Ce(mg L-1) | B Ce(mg L-1) | Ce (mg L-1) | MSEa | Qe (mg g-1) | R (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.74 | 1.07 | 0.91 | 0.16 | 4.696 | 98.19 |
| 2 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.02 | 4.637 | 98.91 |
| 5 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.04 | 4.746 | 98.53 |
| 8 | 0.99 | 1.09 | 1.04 | 0.05 | 4.536 | 97.92 |
| 10 | 1.36 | 1.07 | 1.22 | 0.14 | 4.121 | 97.57 |
| 20 | 1.52 | 1.22 | 1.37 | 0.15 | 4.365 | 97.26 |
| 30 | 1.24 | 1.40 | 1.32 | 0.08 | 4.362 | 97.36 |
| 60 | 1.06 | 1.17 | 1.12 | 0.05 | 4.589 | 97.77 |
| 90 | 1.73 | 1.58 | 1.66 | 0.08 | 4.449 | 96.69 |
| 120 | 2.12 | 1.97 | 2.04 | 0.08 | 4.643 | 95.92 |
a Mean standard error
Influence of the initial concentration of Cu (II)
| Ci (mg L-1) | A Ce(mg L-1) | B Ce(mg L-1) | Ce (mg L-1) | MSEa | Qe (mg g-1) | (R%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 0.85 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.09 | 0.419 | 84.99 |
| 10 | 3.48 | 3.29 | 3.38 | 0.09 | 0.651 | 66.16 |
| 20 | 0.45 | 0.69 | 0.57 | 0.12 | 1.877 | 97.16 |
| 30 | 1.43 | 2.84 | 2.14 | 0.70 | 2.732 | 92.87 |
| 50 | 3.34 | 3.02 | 3.18 | 0.16 | 4.386 | 93.64 |
| 100 | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.01 | 9.274 | 99.64 |
| 150 | 0.47 | 0.79 | 0.64 | 0.16 | 13.999 | 99.58 |
| 200 | 2.79 | 4.43 | 3.62 | 0.82 | 16.774 | 98.19 |
aMean standard error