| Literature DB >> 26150865 |
Fatma Eskicioglu1, Burcu Artunc Ulkumen2, Esat Calik3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to investigate whether gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) and healthy pregnancy differ with respect to complete blood count parameters and these parameters can be used both to explain the pathophysiologic mechanisms and differentiate the two conditions from each other.Entities:
Keywords: Gestational trophoblastic disease; Leukocyte count; Platelet activation
Year: 2015 PMID: 26150865 PMCID: PMC4485292 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.313.7109
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pak J Med Sci ISSN: 1681-715X Impact factor: 1.088
Demographic data of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTH) and control groups (mean±SD, Standard Deviation).
| GTH (n=37) | Control (n=61) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 29.8±8.7 | 27.2±5.0 | 0.06 |
| Gravida | 2.6±1.4 | 2.2±1.3 | 0.17 |
| Parity | 1.1±1.2 | 1.0±1.2 | 0.46 |
| Abortions | 0.4±0.6 | 0.3±0.5 | 0.61 |
| Living children | 1.1±1.1 | 0.8±1.1 | 0.28 |
| Gestational age (weeks) | 7.9±1.5 | 7.9±1.9 | 0.85 |
Platelet (PLT), mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW), and white blood cell (WBC) levels in gestational trophoblastic disease (GTH) and control groups (mean±SD, Standard Deviation).
| GTH (n=37) | Control (n=61) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLT (10^3/µL) | 242.6±77.5 | 221.3±65.1 | 0.14 |
| MPV (fL) | 9.1±1.3 | 9.7±1.7 | 0.07 |
| PDW(fL) | 15.8±1.8 | 16.7±1.2 | 0.004 |
| WBC (10^3/µL) | 8.5±2.9 | 11.8±4.0 | <0.001 |
Platelet (PLT), mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW), and white blood cell (WBC) levels in partial mole (PM) and complete mole (CM) subgroups (mean±SD, Standard Deviation).
| PLT(10^3/µL) | MPV(fL) | PDW(fL) | WBC(10^3/µL) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM | 239.10±69.45 | 9.29±1.25 | 16.01±2.16 | 7.69±2.21 |
| CM | 246.82±88.04 | 8.91±1.42 | 15.68±1.40 | 9.56±3.37 |
| P value | 0.89 | 0.42 | 0.34 | 0.97 |
| P value | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.94 | <0.001 |
| P value | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.001 | 0.02 |
PM versus CM group
PM versus control group
CM versus control group.
Fig.1ROC analysis of WBC and PDW for GTD. AUC (area under curve) for WBC: 75.5%. AUC for PDW: 69.3%. ROC analysis indicates a cut-off value 8.19 for WBC with 81.0% sensitivity and 54.1% specificity and 15.85 for PDW cut-off value with 87.9% sensitivity and 44.4% specificity.