Literature DB >> 26150808

Proteomic profile response of Paracoccidioides lutzii to the antifungal argentilactone.

Renata S Prado1, Alexandre M Bailão1, Lívia C Silva1, Cecília M A de Oliveira2, Monique F Marques2, Luciano P Silva3, Elisângela P Silveira-Lacerda4, Aliny P Lima4, Célia M Soares1, Maristela Pereira1.   

Abstract

The dimorphic fungi Paracoccidioides spp. are the etiological agents of paracoccidioidomycosis (PCM), a mycosis of high incidence in Brazil. The toxicity of drug treatment and the emergence of resistant organisms have led to research for new candidates for drugs. In this study, we demonstrate that the natural product argentilactone was not cytotoxic or genotoxic to MRC5 cells at the IC50 concentration to the fungus. We also verified the proteomic profile of Paracoccidioides lutzii after incubation with argentilactone using a label free quantitative proteome nanoUPLC-MS(E). The results of this study indicated that the fungus has a global metabolic adaptation in the presence of argentilactone. Enzymes of important pathways, such as glycolysis, the Krebs cycle and the glyoxylate cycle, were repressed, which drove the metabolism to the methylcytrate cycle and beta-oxidation. Proteins involved in cell rescue, defense and stress response were induced. In this study, alternative metabolic pathways adopted by the fungi were elucidated, helping to elucidate the course of action of the compound studied.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Paracoccidioides lutzzi; antifungal; argentilactone; paracoccidioidomycosis; proteomic

Year:  2015        PMID: 26150808      PMCID: PMC4471430          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


Introduction

The fungi of the genus Paracoccidioides are thermally dimorphic and cause paracoccidioidomycosis (PCM), a human systemic mycosis prevalent in residents of Latin America (Brummer et al., 1993). In Brazil, systemic mycoses are a major cause of mortality considering infectious diseases and the PCM contributes by more than half of the deaths caused by fungal infections (Prado et al., 2009). An essential step for the establishment of the Paracoccidioides spp. infection is the transition from mycelium to the yeast form. The fungus lives in the environment as mycelial form, which produces propagules that can be inhaled by the host where change to the yeast phase, causing the infection (Franco, 1987). Due to toxicity of drug treatment (Travassos et al., 2008) and the appearance of resistance strains (Hahn et al., 2003), new therapeutic approaches for the treatment of PCM have been suggested (Rittner et al., 2012). Natural compounds, synthetic, and semi-synthetic derivatives with antifungal activity against Paracoccidioides spp. have been investigated (Johann et al., 2012; Zambuzzi-Carvalho et al., 2013). Argentilactone, the major component of Hyptis ovalifolia essential oil, a natural Brazilian plant, inhibits the growth of P. lutzii yeast cells, the dimorphism, and the activity of the glyoxylate cycle key enzyme isocitrate lyase (PbICL) (Prado et al., 2014). In addition, argentilactone inhibits the proliferation of Cryptococcus neoformans, Candida albicans, Tricophyton rubrum, Tricophyton mentagrophyte, Microsporum gypseum, and Microsporum canis (Oliveira et al., 2004). Several antifungals drugs act by mechanisms poorly understood. New approaches such as genomics and proteomics were used to investigate the mode of action of new antifungal agents (Mercer et al., 2011; Chan et al., 2012), to identify new targets (Bruneau et al., 2003; Kley, 2004; Hooshdaran et al., 2005; Delom et al., 2006; Rogers et al., 2006; Hoehamer et al., 2010), and to study the synergistic effects among compounds (Xu et al., 2009; Agarwal et al., 2012). This approach was also used to investigate the clinical action of antifungals and new drugs against Paracoccidioides spp. (Zambuzzi-Carvalho et al., 2013; Neto et al., 2014). The study aimed to investigate the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of argentilactone, as well as, the proteomic profile of P. lutzii after incubation with argentilactone. In addition, the work aimed to evaluate the lipids and glucose levels, and in vivo methylcitrate dehydrogenase transcript level in P. lutzii.

Experimental

Extraction of (R)-argentilactone (2H-pyran-2-one, 6-(1-heptenyl)-5,6-dihydro-,[r-(z)])

The essential oil of H. ovalifolia was obtained as described previously and the NMR data are consistent with the literature (Oliveira et al., 2004).

Reduction of 3-(4,5- dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) method

The MTT colorimetric method described by Mosmann (1983) was used to evaluation of the cell viability after treatment with 9, 18, 36, and 72 μg/mL argentilactone. The cell viability was measured by the mitochondrial dehydrogenase enzyme activity of living cells. Human lung fibroblast normal cell line (MRC5; CCL-171) used in this study were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection—ATCC, Rockville, Maryland. For the MTT assay, 1 × 104 cells were seeded in 96 well microtiter plates in the absence or presence of argentilactone and incubated at 37°C at atmospheric pressure containing 5% CO2. After incubation for 24 h, 10 μL MTT (5 mg/mL) was added to the cells, and following 4 h of incubation with MTT, 200 μL PBS/20% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was added. A quantification of optical density was measured using a spectrophotometer (Awareness Technology, Palm City, Florida). The percentage of cell viability was calculated by GraphPad Prism 4.02 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California).

Comet assay

The effect genotoxic of argentilactone was examined by comet assay according to Singh et al. (1988). Argentilactone was added at concentrations of 9, 18, 36, and 72 μg/mL to 1 × 105 MRC5 cells and was incubated at 37°C for 24 h. After incubation, 15 μL of the cells was added to 100 μL of a low melting point agarose (0.5%), spread onto microscope glass slides pre-coated with a normal melting point agarose (1.5%), and covered with a coverslip. The slides were incubated for 15 min at 4°C and after were immersed in cold lysis solution (2.4 M NaCl; 100 mM EDTA; 10 mM Tris, 10% dimethylsulfoxide, and 1% Triton-X, pH 10) for 24 h. After lysis, the slides were subjected to electrophoresis for 25 min at 25 V and 300 mA. Thereafter, the slides were neutralized for 15 min in buffer 0.4 M Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, dried at room temperature and fixed in 100% ethanol for 5 min. The slides were stained using 20 μg/mL ethidium bromide. Two slides were prepared for MRC5, and 50 cells were screened per sample using a fluorescence microscope interfaced with a computer. Analysis of the nucleoids was performed in software Comet Score 15 according to the migration of the fragments, as previously described (Kobayashi et al., 1995). The damage index was calculated according to Tice et al. (2000).

P. lutzii and culture conditions

P. lutzii (ATCC-MYA-826) has been extensively studied in different laboratories (Pereira et al., 2010; Cruz et al., 2011; Oliveira et al., 2013; Teixeira et al., 2013). The fungus was cultivated in Fava-Netto's medium (1.0% w/v peptone, 0.5% w/v yeast extract, 0.3% w/v proteose peptone, 0.5% w/v beef extract, 0.5% w/v NaCl, 4% w/v glucose, and 1.4% w/v agar, pH 7.2) (Fava-Netto and Raphael, 1961) at 36°C for growth of the yeast phase.

Culture and cell viability

P. lutzii yeast cells were sub-cultured for 1 week in solid Fava-Netto's medium at 36°C. For viability experiments, yeast cells were cultured in a liquid chemically defined medium McVeigh Morton (MMcM) (Restrepo and Jiménez, 1980) in the absence or presence of a sub-inhibitory concentration of 9 μg/mL argentilactone (Prado et al., 2014) at 36°C. Aliquots were collected after 0, 6, 8, 10, and 12 h of incubation. The cell viability was determined by counting stained cells in a Neubauer chamber using trypan blue, based on the principle that live cells with intact cellular membranes expelled the dye (Strober, 2001). All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Preparation of protein extracts

P. lutzii yeast cells were collected after 10 h of contact with 9 μg/mL argentilactone and the total proteins were extracted. Centrifugation of the cells was performed at 10,000 g for 15 min at 4°C and disrupted by glass beads. The extraction buffer (20 mM Tris- HCl pH 8.8; 2 mM CaCl2) added of a mixture of protease inhibitors (serine, cysteine and calpain inhibitors) (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) was added to the yeast cells. After the addition of glass beads (0.45 mm), the cells were vigorously mixed for 1 h at 4°C, followed by centrifugation at 10,000 g for 15 min at the same temperature. The supernatant was collected, and the protein concentrations were determined by the Bradford reagent (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri). The samples were stored in aliquots at 80°C.

Protein digestion and label free quantitative nanoUPLC-MSEproteomics

Equimolar amount of three biological replicates were pooled were pooled and submitted to the proteomic analysis. A total of 300 μg of each sample in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate was submitted to tryptic digestion. First, 25 μL of the surfactant RapiGEST™ (0.2% v/v) (Waters Corp, Milford, Massachusetts) was added and then incubated at 80°C for 15 min. The protein samples were reduced with 2.5 μL of a 100 mM DTT solution for 30 min at 60°C; and then alkylated with 2.5 μL of 300 mM iodoacetamide in the dark for 30 min. After, 10 μL of 50 ng/μL (in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate) trypsin solution (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin) was added. The sample was digested at 37°C overnight. Following the digestion, RapiGEST™ was hydrolyzed with 10 μL of 5% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid at 37°C for 90 min. The sample was centrifuged at 10,000 g at 4°C for 30 min, and the supernatant was transferred to a Total Recovery vial (Waters Corp). The digests were dried and the peptides were resuspended in 20 mM ammonium formate pH 10. The obtained peptides were further separated by RP-RP-HPLC using a nanoACQUITY™ system (Waters Corp), as described before (Geromanos et al., 2009). Each sample was run in three technical replicates. The column loads were 5 μg of protein digests for the analysis of samples in triplicate. First, the samples were separated in 5 fractions in the mobile phase at pH 10. Each fraction was further separated by reverse phase chromatography with a mobile phase at pH 2.5. Label-free data-independent scanning (MSE) experiments were performed with a Synapt HDMS mass spectrometer (Waters, Manchester, UK), which switched between low collision energy MS (3 eV) and elevated collision energies MSE (12–40 eV) applied to the trap “T-wave” CID cell with argon gas (Curty et al., 2014). The protein identifications and quantitative packaging were generated using specific algorithms (Silva et al., 2005, 2006) and search was performed against a P. lutzii specific database. The ProteinLynx Global server v.2.5.2 (PLGS) with ExpressionE informatics v.2.5.2 was used to proper spectral processing, database searching conditions and quantitative comparisons. The database was randomized to access the false-positive rate of identification (4%). Trypsin was the primary digest reagent, allowing for 1 missed cleavage. Carbamidomethyl-C was specified as fixed modification and phosphorylation STY and oxidation M were used as variable modifications. The minimum fragment ion matches per peptide, the minimum fragment ion matches per protein, and the minimum peptide matches per protein were, respectively set as 2.5 and 1. It was used 50 ppm as mass variation tolerance. A protein detected in all replicates presenting a variance coefficient less than 10% was used to normalize the expression data to compare the protein levels between control and argentilactone-treated conditions. The confidence interval of 95% was used. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (Vizcaíno et al., 2014) via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD002285.

Cell culture and macrophage infection assay

The J774 A1 macrophage cells were cultured in 75 m2 flasks and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 in an RPMI medium (RPMI 1640, Vitrocell, São Paulo, São Paulo) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum. The J774 macrophage cells were plated at 5 × 105 cells per well on 6-well culture plates and infected with P. lutzii yeast cells at a 1:5 ratio macrophage:yeast. The cells were co-cultivated for 12 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 to allow for fungi adhesion and/or internalization. After this, the treatment with 9 μg/mL argentilactone and controls in the absence of argentilactone and presence of sulfametoxazole were conducted.

RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and quantitative real time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis

The samples of P. lutzii infected macrophages in the presence of 9 μg/mL argentilactone and 0.01 mg/mL sulfametoxazole (control) were washed three times with sterile water. After centrifugation, the pellets were frozen in liquid nitrogen. The cells were disrupted with glass beads for 10 min in the presence of Trizol reagent (Invitrogen™, Carlsbad, California) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cDNAs were obtained using Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) and an oligo (dT)15primer. The qRT-PCR reactions were performed in triplicates of three independent experiments using a StepOnePlus™ RT-PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California). The SYBR green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems) was used as the reaction mixture, with 10 pmol of each primer and 40 ng of template cDNA at a final volume of 25 μL. A melting curve analysis and electrophoresis were performed to confirm a single PCR product. The qRT-PCR thermal cycling consisted of 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. Constitutively expressed alpha tubulin (sense: GAGCGATTCATTGGAGGGATT; anti-sense: ATCAGGGAAAACAGAGTAAGTC) (Zambuzzi-Carvalho et al., 2013) was selected to normalize the samples. A non-template control was included to eliminate contamination or non-specific reactions. The standard curve was generated from a pool of cDNA from each sample. The standard cDNA was serially diluted in a ratio of 1:5. The relative expression levels of selected genes were calculated using the standard curve method for relative quantification (Bookout et al., 2006). The oligonucleotides used in the qRT-PCR analyses are relatives to the methylcitrate dehydrogenase gene (sense: CAACTCTGACCTTGCATTTGAT; anti-sense: GATGTTGAAAGCACCGTTGAC). The experiments were performed in triplicate. A Student's t-test was performed to analyze significant differences between the different samples and a p-value p < 0.05 was considered as significant.

Dosage of glucose

The concentration of glucose was determined following the instructions of the enzymatic glucose kit (Doles Ltda, Goiânia, Goiás). A total of 1 × 105 cells was treated with 9 μg/mL of argentilactone by 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h. The control cells were grown in the absence of argentilactone. Aliquots of 10 μL were collected in each time, adding 1 mL of color solution and incubated for 5 min at 37°C. The absorbance was measured by spectrophotometer at 510 nm.

Determination of intracellular lipid content

Intracellular lipid content was determined by flow cytometry using lipophilic dye Nile Red. Aliquots were collected after 0, 6, 10, 12 and 24 h of incubation with 9 μg/mL of argentilactone and in the absence of the compound. The cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated with 2 μg/mL Nile red (Sigma Aldrich), for 15 min at room temperature. Nile red intracellular fluorescence was determined by guava easyCyte™ Flow Cytometers (Merck Millipore, Billerica, EUA) on emission channel of 585 nm and excitation 488 nm. A total of 5000 cells were collected to analysis.

Results and discussion

Evaluation of argentilactone cytotoxicity against human cells

The cytoxicity of argentilactone was evaluated for human cells MRC5 (Figure 1). The data show a dose-dependent relationship between the number of dead cells and argentilactone concentration. The concentration of 9 μg/mL argentilactone did not promote cell cytotoxicity for MRC5. For the MRC5 cells, the IC50 was 32 μg/mL. For the P. lutzii yeast cells, the IC50 was 18 μg/mL (Prado et al., 2014). These data suggest that the argentilactone is more toxic to the fungus than for human cells.
Figure 1

Percentage of viable MRC5 normal human cells after exposure to different concentrations of argentilactone. Significance was accepted *p < 0.05. Analysis was performed by a One-Way ANOVA followed by a Tukey post-test.

Percentage of viable MRC5 normal human cells after exposure to different concentrations of argentilactone. Significance was accepted *p < 0.05. Analysis was performed by a One-Way ANOVA followed by a Tukey post-test. Aiming to evaluate if argentilactone induces DNA damage in human cells, the comet assay was performed to MRC5 cells treated with different concentrations of this compound. This assay has achieved the status of a standard test in the battery of tests used to assess the safety of novel pharmaceuticals or other chemicals and is now well-established as a sensitive assay for detecting strand breaks in the DNA of single cells (Fairbairn et al., 1995). Figure 2 shows the effect of argentilactone in MRC5 cells. In the MRC5 normal cells the compound did not induce DNA damage when compared to the negative control (p > 0.05). The data above suggest that this compound is safe to human.
Figure 2

Effect of argentilactone on the induction of MRC5 cells DNA damage. Cells were treated with 9, 18, 36, and 72 μg argentilactone for 24 h and analyzed by comet assay. Analysis was performed by a One-Way ANOVA followed by a Tukey post-test.

Effect of argentilactone on the induction of MRC5 cells DNA damage. Cells were treated with 9, 18, 36, and 72 μg argentilactone for 24 h and analyzed by comet assay. Analysis was performed by a One-Way ANOVA followed by a Tukey post-test.

Determination of incubation time with argentilactone

Metabolic response and survival strategies of P. lutzii were discussed at the molecular level using genomic and proteomic approaches (Desjardins et al., 2011; Weber et al., 2012; Grossklaus et al., 2013; Zambuzzi-Carvalho et al., 2013). In this study, we investigated the response of P. lutzii to the antifungal prototype argentilactone. A viability curve of P. lutzii yeast cells was constructed at time 0, 6, 8, 10, and 12 h in the presence of a sub-inhibitory concentration of 9 μg/mL argentilactone aiming to determine the time point to be used for the proteomic experiments. The time of 10 h with a cell viability of 90% (Figure 3) was chosen for proteomic studies.
Figure 3

Effect of argentilactone on cells growth. Yeast cells were cultured at 36°C in the absence (black) and presence (gray) of 9 μg/mL argentilactone for 12 h. Aliquots were taken and the cells were counted in a Neubauer chamber. *p < 0.05.

Effect of argentilactone on cells growth. Yeast cells were cultured at 36°C in the absence (black) and presence (gray) of 9 μg/mL argentilactone for 12 h. Aliquots were taken and the cells were counted in a Neubauer chamber. *p < 0.05.

Proteomic response of P. lutzii upon exposure to argentilactone

A nanoUPLC-MSE-based proteomics approach was employed to identify the P. lutzii yeast cell differentially regulated proteins in response to argentilactone. A total of 211 proteins were identified of which 155 had significant regulation at a 1.2-fold change or more. This cut off ratio was used in order to identify broader cellular processes regulated by the compound instead to focus in specifically regulated proteins. From these, 32 were more abundant, 88 less abundant, 20 detected only in treated cells and 15 detected only in the control. A total of 7% of the proteins had no predicted function; the other 93% were classified in functional categories using the FunCat2 system. The regulated proteins were clustered in proteins with increased expression after incubation with argentilactone (Table 1) and proteins with decreased expression after incubation with argentilactone (Table 2).
Table 1

more abundant proteins after incubation with argentilactone.

Functional categoryaProtein descriptionAccession numberbProtein scoreFold change
METABOLISM
Amino acid metabolism1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenasePAAG_052531803.481.768
4-aminobutyrate aminotransferasePAAG_004681503.691.804
Homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenasePAAG_08164739.591.878
Methylmalonate-semialdehyde dehydrogenasePAAG_070361184.681.336
O-acetylhomoserine (Thiol)-lyasePAAG_081003986.801.323
Serine hydroxymethyltransferasePAAG_085121347.521.221
Pyruvate decarboxylasePAAG_020501361.751.323
Sulfite oxidasePAAG_078111481.901.221
Aminopeptidase BPAAG_09004450.66*
Aspartyl aminopeptidasePAAG_04205526.39*
Aspartyl aminopeptidasePAAG_00664568.78*
Cysteine synthasePAAG_07813412.94*
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA lyasePAAG_062151087.40*
Formate dehydrogenase-IIIPAAG_035991012.38*
Carbohydrate metabolismTriosephosphate isomerasePAAG_0258510825.001.246
Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex component Pdx1PAAG_00666997.131.768
Pyruvate dehydrogenase complexPAAG_00050877.321.616
Fumarate reductase Osm1PAAG_048512013.071.234
4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenasePAAG_078754971.331.568
N-acetylglucosamine-phosphate mutasePAAG_01931398.11*
Aldehyde dehydrogenasePAAG_05392399.42*
FumarylacetoacetasePAAG_081632404.041.234
Nitrogen metabolismFormamidasePAAG_033331620.071.209
Nucleotide metabolismRad4 family proteinPAAG_050192058.261.377
Coenzyme metabolismRiboflavin synthase subunit alphaPAAG_01934554.30*
Cell rescue, defense and virulenceProteasome component C5PAAG_008661414.16*
Superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn]PAAG_041642348.641.297
Sulfur metabolite repression control protein CPAAG_073394835.50*
ENERGY
Eletron transportCytochrome c oxidase polypeptide VIPAAG_072462376.001.477
Cytochrome c oxidase polypeptide IVPAAG_06796711.90
Associate energy conservationCytochrome c PriAC=F2TJX0PAAG_062681307.211.522
Glycolysis and gluconeogenesis6-phosphogluconolactonasePAAG_05621688.501.297
Glyoxylate cycleMalate synthasePAAG_04542617.40*
Krebs cycleSuccinyl-CoA:PAAG_05093770.38*
Methyl citrate cycle2-methylcitrate dehydratasePAAG_0455920407.151.297
Oxidation of fatty acidsEnoyl-CoA hydratasePAAG_063093244.111.716
Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferasePAAG_034471578.04*
Peroxisomal 3-ketoacyl-coA thiolasePAAG_036891248.76*
Siderophore-iron transportSiderophore peptide synthasePAAG_023541582.68*
Protein fateChaperone DnaKPAAG_0133914261.801.259
ChaperoninPAAG_0514271219.031.584
Chaperonin GroLPAAG_0805936257.801.336
GrpE protein homologPAAG_062556685.851.649
Glutathione S-transferasePAAG_08162766.511.405
Peptidylprolyl isomerasePAAG_057883381.681.284
CORD and CS domain-containing proteinPAAG_029731899.14*
MiscellaneousThiol methyltransferasePAAG_069551027.931.391
TranslationEndoribonuclease L-PSPPAAG_0831312115.911.234
UnclassifiedUncharacterized proteinPAAG_00297870.531.649
Uncharacterized proteinPAAG_077721786.941.209

Functional category—based on the MIPS Functional categories database and GO.

Accession number—accession number of matched protein from Paracoccidioides database (.

Proteins detected only during incubation with argentilactone.

Table 2

less abundant proteins after incubation with argentilactone.

Functional categoryaProtein descriptionAccession numberbProtein scoreFold change
METABOLISM
Amino acid metabolismAcetolactate synthasePAAG_00221849.430.726
Argininosuccinate synthasePAAG_071146934.380.522
Cobalamin-independent methionine synthase MetH/DPAAG_076262518.100.577
Isovaleryl-CoA dehydrogenase, mitochondrialPAAG_04102953.650.811
NADP-specific glutamate dehydrogenasePAAG_076891723.700.600
Ornithine aminotransferasePAAG_064311262.540.684
Lysine decarboxylase-like proteinPAAG_03537800.11*
NAD-specific glutamate dehydrogenasePAAG_010021969.33*
Saccharopine dehydrogenasePAAG_026931249.65*
Serine hydroxymethyltransferasePAAG_074124659.480.677
Carbohydrate metabolismMannitol-1-phosphate dehydrogenasePAAG_064734920.790.726
Eukaryotic phosphomannomutasePAAG_008891400.740.691
GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase APAAG_08174860.91*
Transketolase TktAPAAG_044442581.210.763
Coenzyme metabolismAdenosylhomocysteinasePAAG_0285914585.170.440
Dihydropteroate synthasePAAG_01324870.830.779
Pyridoxine biosynthesis protein pyroAPAAG_073212354.970.787
S-adenosylmethionine synthasePAAG_029016069.650.357
Nucleotide metabolismBifunctional purine biosynthesis protein ADE17PAAG_007314517.890.811
Adenylosuccinate lyasePAAG_04974686.76*
S-methyl-5-thioadenosine phosphorylasePAAG_013021274.52*
UDP-N-acetylglucosamine pyrophosphorylasePAAG_06885768.340.779
Phosphate metabolismInorganic pyrophosphatasePAAG_006574020.000.771
Cell cycle and dna processingCell division cycle protein 48PAAG_055181782.700.719
D-tyrosyl-tRNA(Tyr) deacylasePAAG_0333422078.910.741
Nascent polypeptide-associated complex subunit alphaPAAG_045714281.410.779
Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerasePAAG_061682417.210.795
Proliferating cell nuclear antigenPAAG_009235676.480.748
TCTP family proteinPAAG_0908323693.700.463
ThioredoxinPAAG_0236425560.740.719
UV excision repair protein Rad23PAAG_049491953.930.651
Cell rescue, defense and virulenceHeat shock protein 30PAAG_008716591.330.492
Heat shock protein 88PAAG_0775015855.800.811
Heat shock protein SSBPAAG_077755550.620.487
ENERGY
Eletron transport and membran associate energy conservationATP synthase D chain, mitochondrialPAAG_045701983.650.748
ATP synthase gamma chainPAAG_055764554.870.595
ATP synthase subunit alphaPAAG_0482017850.350.670
ATP synthase subunit betaPAAG_0803719311.820.726
Glycolysis and gluconeogenesisPhosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase AcuFPAAG_082032953.750.554
Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component alpha subunitPAAG_08295904.410.748
Glucokinase glkAPAAG_06172746.76*
PhosphoglucomutasePAAG_020112057.000.482
Phosphoglycerate kinasePAAG_028693428.250.619
Pyruvate kinasePAAG_063809829.550.657
EnolasePAAG_0077139472.250.779
Phosphofructokinase subunitPAAG_01583587.46*
Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component beta subunitPAAG_015342794.880.733
Glyoxylate cycleIsocitrate lyasePAAG_04549923.710.827
Krebs cycleMalate dehydrogenasePAAG_0005347991.240.795
Malate dehydrogenasePAAG_084497490.870.756
Isocitrate dehydrogenase subunit 1PAAG_008561820.37*
Isocitrate dehydrogenase subunit 2PAAG_077291604.29*
Succinate dehydrogenase flavoprotein subunit, mitochondrialPAAG_017251798.190.827
Oxidation of fatty acidsShort-chain specific acyl-CoA dehydrogenasePAAG_054541028.15*
TransportCarbonic anhydrasePAAG_05716854.250.795
Clathrin light chainPAAG_082521049.510.741
GTP-binding nuclear protein ran-1PAAG_046513676.190.527
Nipsnap family proteinPAAG_059604593.910.677
Vesicular-fusion protein sec17PAAG_06233559.70*
Rab GDP-dissociation inhibitorPAAG_063441958.400.625
Protein fateG-protein comlpex beta subunit CpcBPAAG_069962600.700.741
Protein disulfide-isomerasePAAG_0098614896.180.670
MiscellaneousThiol-specific antioxidantPAAG_032164271.920.427
TranslationCytosolic large ribosomal subunit protein L30PAAG_010506746.860.756
40S ribosomal protein S0PAAG_0211110467.630.741
40S ribosomal protein S11PAAG_063673129.840.512
40S ribosomal protein S14PAAG_014331642.340.712
40s ribosomal protein s15PAAG_046906547.010.625
40s ribosomal protein s26PAAG_078479205.880.477
40S ribosomal protein S5PAAG_054845524.470.625
40S ribosomal protein S7PAAG_071827212.750.670
40S ribosomal protein S8PAAG_002643915.070.651
40S ribosomal protein S9PAAG_014352407.070.487
40S ribosomal protein S9PAAG_038282402.260.502
60S ribosomal protein L13PAAG_063205338.780.589
60S ribosomal protein L15PAAG_009694623.560.468
60S ribosomal protein L18APAAG_009523245.520.571
60S ribosomal protein L2PAAG_004302292.830.517
60S ribosomal protein L43PAAG_0656912650.100.543
60S ribosomal protein L4-APAAG_088885405.800.619
60S ribosomal protein L5PAAG_00548911.540.795
60S ribosomal protein L7PAAG_064873961.730.748
60S ribosomal proteinPAAG_018344195.170.538
60S ribosomal protein L31EPAAG_049652514.61*
Ribosomal protein S23PAAG_00385923.83*
Elongation factor 1-alphaPAAG_0202413081.640.284
Elongation factor 1-betaPAAG_0302826825.630.427
Elongation factor 1-gammaPAAG_035569096.780.317
Elongation factor 2PAAG_0059411304.170.403
Polyadenylate-binding proteinPAAG_002441647.870.631
Ribosomal protein L19PAAG_084973909.550.607
Ribosomal protein P0PAAG_008012669.740.560
Ribosomal protein S20PAAG_033221872.130.763
Ribosomal protein S6PAAG_026341918.030.589
40S Ribosomal protein S3PAAG_017856921.450.595
U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein componentPAAG_07785372.290.242
UnclassifiedHypothetical proteinPAAG_079552234.100.507
Uncharacterized proteinPAAG_07989907.760.657
Uncharacterized proteinPAAG_04274841.040.726
Uncharacterized proteinPAAG_024341488.40*
Uncharacterized proteinPAAG_0784111750.100.458
Uncharacterized proteinPAAG_007243895.920.492

Functional category—based on the MIPS Functional categories database and GO.

Accession number—accession number of matched protein from Paracoccidioides database (.

Proteins detected only in control conditions.

more abundant proteins after incubation with argentilactone. Functional category—based on the MIPS Functional categories database and GO. Accession number—accession number of matched protein from Paracoccidioides database (. Proteins detected only during incubation with argentilactone. less abundant proteins after incubation with argentilactone. Functional category—based on the MIPS Functional categories database and GO. Accession number—accession number of matched protein from Paracoccidioides database (. Proteins detected only in control conditions. The proteomic analysis, including all regulated proteins, showed proteins associated with metabolism 35.4%, translation 21.9%, protein fate 5.8%, unclassified 5.8%, transport 4.5%, cell cycle 3.2%, cell rescue 3.2%, energy 1.5% and miscellaneous 1.3% (Figure 4A; Tables 1, 2). The proteome analysis that included up-regulation and proteins exclusive to the presence of argentilactone showed proteins associated with metabolism 49%, energy 21.5%, protein fate 11.7%, unclassified 7.8%, cell rescue 3.9%, transport 1.9%, translation 1.9% and miscellaneous 1.9% (Figure 4B; Table 1). The proteome analysis that included down-regulation and proteins exclusive to the control condition showed proteins associated with translation 30.7%, metabolism 28.8%, energy 12.5%, cell cycle 7.6%, unclassified 6.7%, transport 5.7%, cell rescue 2.8%, protein fate 1.9% and miscellaneous 0.9% (Figure 4C; Table 2).
Figure 4

Diagram depicting the breakdown of proteins. (A) Proteins differentially expressed in the absence and presence of argentilactone; (B) More abundant proteins in the presence of argentilactone; (C) Less abundant proteins in the absence of argentilactone.

Diagram depicting the breakdown of proteins. (A) Proteins differentially expressed in the absence and presence of argentilactone; (B) More abundant proteins in the presence of argentilactone; (C) Less abundant proteins in the absence of argentilactone. The proteins involved in cell rescue, defense, and virulence confer protection to the cell and assure survival upon various stresses. Molecular chaperones are very conserved and has the function related to maintenance of conformational equilibrium of proteins (Hartl, 1996). In this study, as could be expected, were identified stress-related proteins regulated in the presence of argentilactone (Tables 1, 2). In addition to the heat shock proteins, proteasome component C5 and sulfur metabolite repression control protein C were exclusive to P. lutzii exposed to argentilactone. This result could indicate the involvement of these proteins in protecting the fungus from the stress generated by argentilactone. Our proteomic analyses indicate a global reorganization of P. lutzii carbohydrate metabolism during the exposure to argentilactone. One change detected here is the decrease of several enzymes of glycolytic pathway such as enolase, phosphoglucomutase, phosphoglycerate kinase, pyruvate kinase, and those exclusive to the absence of argentilactone as glucokinase and phosphofructokinase (Table 2). The down-regulation of succinate dehydrogenase, two malate dehydrogenases, and isocitrate dehydrogenase subunits 1 and 2 (Table 2), shows that Krebs cycle is not completely functioning in P. lutzii. In the presence of argentilactone, P. lutzii decreased the glucose consume (Figure 5), suggesting that glycolysis is partially blocked. In addition, the gluconeogenesis is also not completely functioning, as phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase is less abundant (Table 2). Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase plays an importantl role in the pathogenesis of tuberculosis, sinceit is essential for Mycobacterium tuberculosis during mouse infection. M. tuberculosis utilizes primarily gluconeogenic substrates for in vivo persistence, suggesting that this enzyme represents a target for treatments (Marrero et al., 2010).
Figure 5

Glucose quantification. The level of glucose was quantified by enzymatic kit after 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h. The control was performed with cells in the absence of argentilactone. The Student's t-test was used for statistical comparisons, and the observed differences were statistically significant (*p ≤ 0.05).

Glucose quantification. The level of glucose was quantified by enzymatic kit after 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h. The control was performed with cells in the absence of argentilactone. The Student's t-test was used for statistical comparisons, and the observed differences were statistically significant (*p ≤ 0.05). The glyoxylate cycle is not completely functioning in the presence of argentilactone as the enzyme isocitrate lyase is less abundant (Table 2). This finding is consistent with our previous results showing that the P. lutzii isocitrate lyase recombinant and native forms were inhibited in the presence of argentilactone (Prado et al., 2014). On the other hand, malate synthase is more abundant. Under the absence of six-carbon elements, the glyoxylate cycle is induced (Fernandez et al., 1993). The glyoxylate pathway is important in the generations of C4 dicarboxylic acids from acetyl-CoA units, bypassing the decarboxylation steps in the TCA cycle. The cycle is important to fungal pathogenesis. For example, many of the genes highly induced in phagocytized C. albicans were members of the glyoxylate cycle (Lorenz and Fink, 2001; Lorenz et al., 2004). The C. albicans isocitrate lyase gene is essential for gluconeogenic carbon source utilization and starvation rather than a marker for lipid metabolism (Brock, 2009; Otzen et al., 2013). The methylcitrate cycle is an alternative route of carbon through pyruvate production (Bramer et al., 2002) and an important pathway for propionyl-CoA metabolism is the methylcitrate pathway. The 2-methylcitrate dehydratase that participates in the methylcitrate cycle is more abundant (Table 1). In addition, methylmalonate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase that produces propionyl-CoA seems to lead to the production of pyruvate (Table 1). Pyruvate produces acetaldehyde from the action of pyruvate decarboxylase that is more abundant in the presence of argentilactone (Table 1). Up-regulation of o-acetylhomoserine (thiol)-lyase leads to the production of L-methionine and acetate. Acetate is converted to acetoacetyl-CoA by the action of acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase, which was only detected during the treatment with argentilactone (Table 1). The β-oxidation is a pathway for the utilization of fatty acids (Poirier et al., 2006) in which the 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolases enzymes are so important (Otzen et al., 2013). The enzymes 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase, which was only detected in P. lutzii exposed to argentilactone, and enoyl-CoA hydratase from β-oxidation were also more abundant (Table 1). The lipids content from P. lutzzi was decreased in the presence of argentilactone mainly after 24 h (Figure 6) reinforcing the importance of the β-oxidation and methylcitrate cycle for P. lutzzi responding to argentilactone.
Figure 6

Effect of argentilactone on intracellular lipid content of . The presence of lipids was determined by flow cytometry. Cells was stained with dye Nile Red (A). The analysis of yeast cells in presence and absence of argentilactone for (B) 0 h, (C) 6 h, (D) 10 h, (E) 12 h, and (F) 24 h was performed. Line histograms represent the cells treated with argentilactone and dotted histograms represent control cells without treatment.

Effect of argentilactone on intracellular lipid content of . The presence of lipids was determined by flow cytometry. Cells was stained with dye Nile Red (A). The analysis of yeast cells in presence and absence of argentilactone for (B) 0 h, (C) 6 h, (D) 10 h, (E) 12 h, and (F) 24 h was performed. Line histograms represent the cells treated with argentilactone and dotted histograms represent control cells without treatment. Glyoxylate is not produced from isocitrate because isocitrate lyase is less abundant in the presence of argentilactone. The high production of succinate is indicated by up-regulation of fumarylacetoacetase, which uses 4-fumarylacetoacetate to produce fumarate, and then fumarate reductase uses fumarate to produce succinate (Table 1). It is important to mention that argentilactone weakened the protein synthesis of P. lutzii. Translation was the functional category most affected with 33 less abundant proteins. In general, we could observe that energy-producing pathways, such as glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, and TCA, were less abundant in the presence of argentilactone. An overview of the metabolic changes of P. lutzii in presence of the compound is shown in Figure 7.
Figure 7

Metabolic changes of yeast cells exposed to argentilactone. The less abundant proteins during treatment are not highlighted. The more abundant proteins are underlined. GC, glyoxylate cycle; TCA, tricarboxylic acid cycle; MCC, methylcitrate cycle; GLK, glucokinase; PFK-1, phosphofructokinase-1; PGK, phosphoglycerate kinase; ENO, enolase; PYK, pyruvate kinase; ICL, isocitrate lyase; MLS, malate synthase; MDH, malate dehydrogenase; FAH, fumarylacetoacetase; FRD, fumarate reductase; ECH: enoyl-CoA-hydratase; KAT, acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase; SDH, succinate dehydrogenase; IDH, isocitrate dehydrogenase; MCD, methylcitrate dehydrogenase.

Metabolic changes of yeast cells exposed to argentilactone. The less abundant proteins during treatment are not highlighted. The more abundant proteins are underlined. GC, glyoxylate cycle; TCA, tricarboxylic acid cycle; MCC, methylcitrate cycle; GLK, glucokinase; PFK-1, phosphofructokinase-1; PGK, phosphoglycerate kinase; ENO, enolase; PYK, pyruvate kinase; ICL, isocitrate lyase; MLS, malate synthase; MDH, malate dehydrogenase; FAH, fumarylacetoacetase; FRD, fumarate reductase; ECH: enoyl-CoA-hydratase; KAT, acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase; SDH, succinate dehydrogenase; IDH, isocitrate dehydrogenase; MCD, methylcitrate dehydrogenase.

Validation of nanoUPLC-MSE data

The innate immune cells like resident macrophages and dendritic cells are the first barriers of defense system that interact with Paracoccidioides spp. cells (Calich et al., 2008). It is known that the phagosome is poor in nutrients and was reported to not are a good environment as evidenced by the little quantities of glucose, other sugars, and amino acids (Lorenz et al., 2004; Fan et al., 2005; Tavares et al., 2007; Cooney and Klein, 2008; Silva et al., 2008). Methylcitrate dehydrogenase is an important enzyme of the methylcitrate cycle. Thus, aiming to verify whether the transcript is regulated in vivo when P. lutzii is exposed to argentilactone, the compound was added to the medium during J744 A.1 macrophage infection. The relative expression analysis of transcripts encoding methylcitrate dehydrogenase was performed using qRT-PCR. Figure 8 shows that genes encoding methylcitrate dehydrogenase were induced, corroborating the observations from proteomic data. This finding indicates that the methylcitrate cycle composes the response of yeast cells during macrophage infection and not only in vitro.
Figure 8

Quantification of the mRNA expression of the methylcitrate dehydrogenase gene of infecting macrophage during exposure to argentilactone and sulfamethoxazole by quantitative qRT-PCR. (1) P. lutzii (Pl); (2) P. lutzii (Pl) + argentilactone (Al); (3) P. lutzii (Pl) + argentilactone (Al) + ø; (4) P. lutzii (Pl) + sulfamethoxazole (S); (5) P. lutzii (Pl) + sulfamethoxazole (S) + ø; (6) P. lutzii(Pl) + ø. Data were normalized to the tubulin transcript. Data were analyzed by a One-Way ANOVA and a Tukey's multiple comparison post-test. *p ≤ 0.05.

Quantification of the mRNA expression of the methylcitrate dehydrogenase gene of infecting macrophage during exposure to argentilactone and sulfamethoxazole by quantitative qRT-PCR. (1) P. lutzii (Pl); (2) P. lutzii (Pl) + argentilactone (Al); (3) P. lutzii (Pl) + argentilactone (Al) + ø; (4) P. lutzii (Pl) + sulfamethoxazole (S); (5) P. lutzii (Pl) + sulfamethoxazole (S) + ø; (6) P. lutzii(Pl) + ø. Data were normalized to the tubulin transcript. Data were analyzed by a One-Way ANOVA and a Tukey's multiple comparison post-test. *p ≤ 0.05.

Conclusions

The global characterization of the proteomic profile of P. lutzii responding to argentilactone enabled the visualization of the metabolic adaptation of the fungus to drug exposure. Important metabolic pathways were regulated, explaining the strong action of the compound on fungus growth and viability. In this study, alternative metabolic pathways adopted by the fungi were elucidated and helped to elucidate the course of action of the compound studied.

Funding

This work performed at Universidade Federal de Goiás was supported by MCTI/CNPq (Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia/Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico), FNDCT (Fundo Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico), FAPEG (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás), CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior), FINEP (Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos), and INCT-IF (Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia para Inovação Farmacêutica). Additionally, FSA and BRSN were supported by fellowship from CAPES.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  53 in total

Review 1.  Peroxisomal beta-oxidation--a metabolic pathway with multiple functions.

Authors:  Yves Poirier; Vasily D Antonenkov; Tuomo Glumoff; J Kalervo Hiltunen
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2006-08-30

Review 2.  Fungal metabolism in host niches.

Authors:  Matthias Brock
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 7.934

3.  Growth of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis yeast phase in a chemically defined culture medium.

Authors:  A Restrepo; B E Jiménez
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Fungal adaptation to the mammalian host: it is a new world, after all.

Authors:  Nicole M Cooney; Bruce S Klein
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 7.934

5.  The detection, correlation, and comparison of peptide precursor and product ions from data independent LC-MS with data dependant LC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Scott J Geromanos; Johannes P C Vissers; Jeffrey C Silva; Craig A Dorschel; Guo-Zhong Li; Marc V Gorenstein; Robert H Bateman; James I Langridge
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 6.  Paracoccidioidomycosis: an update.

Authors:  E Brummer; E Castaneda; A Restrepo
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Trypan blue exclusion test of cell viability.

Authors:  W Strober
Journal:  Curr Protoc Immunol       Date:  2001-05

8.  Mortality due to systemic mycoses as a primary cause of death or in association with AIDS in Brazil: a review from 1996 to 2006.

Authors:  Marli Prado; Marcelo Barbosa da Silva; Ruy Laurenti; Luiz R Travassos; Carlos P Taborda
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.743

9.  Therapeutic DNA vaccine encoding peptide P10 against experimental paracoccidioidomycosis.

Authors:  Glauce M G Rittner; Julián E Muñoz; Alexandre F Marques; Joshua D Nosanchuk; Carlos P Taborda; Luiz R Travassos
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2012-02-28

10.  Transcriptional profile of Paracoccidioides induced by oenothein B, a potential antifungal agent from the Brazilian Cerrado plant Eugenia uniflora.

Authors:  Patrícia Fernanda Zambuzzi-Carvalho; Patrícia Kott Tomazett; Suzana Costa Santos; Pedro Henrique Ferri; Clayton Luiz Borges; Wellington Santos Martins; Célia Maria de Almeida Soares; Maristela Pereira
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 3.605

View more
  10 in total

1.  Argentilactone Molecular Targets in Paracoccidioides brasiliensis Identified by Chemoproteomics.

Authors:  Lívia do Carmo Silva; Sinji Borges Ferreira Tauhata; Lilian Cristiane Baeza; Cecília Maria Alves de Oliveira; Lucília Kato; Clayton Luiz Borges; Célia Maria de Almeida Soares; Maristela Pereira
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Decreased expression of 14-3-3 in Paracoccidioides brasiliensis confirms its involvement in fungal pathogenesis.

Authors:  Caroline Maria Marcos; Julhiany de Fátima ds Silva; Haroldo Cesar de Oliveira; Patrícia Akemi Assato; Junya de Lacorte Singulani; Angela Maria Lopez; Diana Patricia Tamayo; Orville Hernandez-Ruiz; Juan G McEwen; Maria José Soares Mendes-Giannini; Ana Marisa Fusco-Almeida
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 5.882

Review 3.  Antifungal Resistance, Metabolic Routes as Drug Targets, and New Antifungal Agents: An Overview about Endemic Dimorphic Fungi.

Authors:  Juliana Alves Parente-Rocha; Alexandre Melo Bailão; André Correa Amaral; Carlos Pelleschi Taborda; Juliano Domiraci Paccez; Clayton Luiz Borges; Maristela Pereira
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.711

4.  Proteomic Characterization of Armillaria mellea Reveals Oxidative Stress Response Mechanisms and Altered Secondary Metabolism Profiles.

Authors:  Cassandra Collins; Rachel Hurley; Nada Almutlaqah; Grainne O'Keeffe; Thomas M Keane; David A Fitzpatrick; Rebecca A Owens
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2017-09-17

5.  Propionate metabolism in a human pathogenic fungus: proteomic and biochemical analyses.

Authors:  Luiz Paulo Araújo Santos; Leandro do Prado Assunção; Patrícia de Souza Lima; Gabriel Brum Tristão; Matthias Brock; Clayton Luiz Borges; Mirelle Garcia Silva-Bailão; Célia Maria de Almeida Soares; Alexandre Melo Bailão
Journal:  IMA Fungus       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.515

6.  Interaction of Isocitrate Lyase with Proteins Involved in the Energetic Metabolism in Paracoccidioides lutzii.

Authors:  Kleber Santiago Freitas E Silva; Raisa Melo Lima; Patrícia de Sousa Lima; Lilian Cristiane Baeza; Roosevelt Alves da Silva; Célia Maria de Almeida Soares; Maristela Pereira
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-23

Review 7.  Overview of Antifungal Drugs against Paracoccidioidomycosis: How Do We Start, Where Are We, and Where Are We Going?

Authors:  Lívia do Carmo Silva; Amanda Alves de Oliveira; Dienny Rodrigues de Souza; Katheryne Lohany Barros Barbosa; Kleber Santiago Freitas E Silva; Marcos Antonio Batista Carvalho Júnior; Olívia Basso Rocha; Raisa Melo Lima; Thaynara Gonzaga Santos; Célia Maria de Almeida Soares; Maristela Pereira
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-19

8.  Antifungal activity of extracts from Atacama Desert fungi against Paracoccidioides brasiliensis and identification of Aspergillus felis as a promising source of natural bioactive compounds.

Authors:  Graziele Mendes; Vívian N Gonçalves; Elaine M Souza-Fagundes; Markus Kohlhoff; Carlos A Rosa; Carlos L Zani; Betania B Cota; Luiz H Rosa; Susana Johann
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.743

9.  iTRAQ Proteomic Analysis Reveals That Metabolic Pathways Involving Energy Metabolism Are Affected by Tea Tree Oil in Botrytis cinerea.

Authors:  Jiayu Xu; Xingfeng Shao; Yingying Wei; Feng Xu; Hongfei Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Chemoproteomic identification of molecular targets of antifungal prototypes, thiosemicarbazide and a camphene derivative of thiosemicarbazide, in Paracoccidioides brasiliensis.

Authors:  Joyce Villa Verde Bastos Borba; Sinji Borges Ferreira Tauhata; Cecília Maria Alves de Oliveira; Monique Ferreira Marques; Alexandre Melo Bailão; Célia Maria de Almeida Soares; Maristela Pereira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.