Ayobami T Akenroye1, Anne M Stack1. 1. Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Care guidelines can improve the quality of care by making current evidence available in a concise format. Emergency departments (EDs) are an ideal site for guidelines given the wide variety of presenting conditions and treating providers, and the need for timely decision making. We designed a programme for guideline development and implementation and evaluated its impact in an ED. METHODS: The setting was an urban paediatric ED with an annual volume of 60 000. Common and/or high-risk conditions were identified for guideline development. Following implementation of the guidelines, their impact on effectiveness of care, patient outcomes, efficiency and equitability of care was assessed using a web-based provider survey and performance on identified metrics. Variation in clinical care between providers was assessed using funnel plots. RESULTS: Eleven (11) guidelines were developed and implemented. 3 years after the initiation of the programme, self-reported adherence to recommendations was high (95% for physicians and 89% for nurses). 97% of physicians and 92% of nurses stated that the programme improved the quality of care in the ED. For some guidelines, provider-to-provider care practice variation was reduced significantly. We found reduced disparity in imaging when assessing one guideline. There were also reductions in utilisation of diagnostic tests or therapies. As a balancing measure, the percentage of patients with any of the guideline conditions who returned to the ED within 72 h of discharge did not change from before to after guideline initiation. Overall, 80% of physician and 56% of nurse respondents rated the guideline programme at the highest value. CONCLUSIONS: A programme for guideline development and implementation helped to improve efficiency, and standardise and eliminate disparities in emergency care without jeopardising patient outcomes. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
INTRODUCTION: Care guidelines can improve the quality of care by making current evidence available in a concise format. Emergency departments (EDs) are an ideal site for guidelines given the wide variety of presenting conditions and treating providers, and the need for timely decision making. We designed a programme for guideline development and implementation and evaluated its impact in an ED. METHODS: The setting was an urban paediatric ED with an annual volume of 60 000. Common and/or high-risk conditions were identified for guideline development. Following implementation of the guidelines, their impact on effectiveness of care, patient outcomes, efficiency and equitability of care was assessed using a web-based provider survey and performance on identified metrics. Variation in clinical care between providers was assessed using funnel plots. RESULTS: Eleven (11) guidelines were developed and implemented. 3 years after the initiation of the programme, self-reported adherence to recommendations was high (95% for physicians and 89% for nurses). 97% of physicians and 92% of nurses stated that the programme improved the quality of care in the ED. For some guidelines, provider-to-provider care practice variation was reduced significantly. We found reduced disparity in imaging when assessing one guideline. There were also reductions in utilisation of diagnostic tests or therapies. As a balancing measure, the percentage of patients with any of the guideline conditions who returned to the ED within 72 h of discharge did not change from before to after guideline initiation. Overall, 80% of physician and 56% of nurse respondents rated the guideline programme at the highest value. CONCLUSIONS: A programme for guideline development and implementation helped to improve efficiency, and standardise and eliminate disparities in emergency care without jeopardising patient outcomes. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Entities:
Keywords:
emergency care systems; emergency care systems, efficiency; emergency department; paediatric emergency med; paramedics, guidelines
Authors: Todd W Lyons; Anne M Stack; Michael C Monuteaux; Stephanie L Parver; Catherine R Gordon; Caroline D Gordon; Mark R Proctor; Lise E Nigrovic Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-05-11 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Karen S Farbman; Kenneth A Michelson; Mark I Neuman; Timothy E Dribin; Lynda C Schneider; Anne M Stack Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Olha Halyabar; Margaret H Chang; Michelle L Schoettler; Marc A Schwartz; Ezgi H Baris; Leslie A Benson; Catherine M Biggs; Mark Gorman; Leslie Lehmann; Mindy S Lo; Peter A Nigrovic; Craig D Platt; Gregory P Priebe; Jared Rowe; Robert P Sundel; Neeraj K Surana; Katja G Weinacht; Alison Mann; Jenny Chan Yuen; Patricia Meleedy-Rey; Amy Starmer; Taruna Banerjee; Fatma Dedeoglu; Barbara A Degar; Melissa M Hazen; Lauren A Henderson Journal: Pediatr Rheumatol Online J Date: 2019-02-14 Impact factor: 3.054