Ryan D Nipp1, Leah L Zullig2,3, Gregory Samsa4, Jeffrey M Peppercorn4, Deborah Schrag1, Donald H Taylor5, Amy P Abernethy4, S Yousuf Zafar4. 1. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. 3. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. 4. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, DUMC, Durham, NC, USA. 5. Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cancer patients may experience financial distress as a side effect of their care. Little is known about which patients are at greatest risk for altering their care or lifestyle due to treatment-related financial distress. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study to determine which patients are at greatest risk for altering their care or lifestyle due to treatment-related financial distress. Eligible patients were adults receiving cancer treatment enrolled between June 2010 and May 2011. We grouped coping strategies as lifestyle altering or care altering. We assessed coping strategies and relationships between covariates using descriptive statistics and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Among 174 participants, 89% used at least one lifestyle-altering coping strategy, while 39% used a care-altering strategy. Care-altering coping strategies adopted by patients included the following: not filling a prescription (28%) and taking less medication than prescribed (23%). Lifestyle-altering strategies included the following: spending less on leisure activities (77%), spending less on basics like food and clothing (57%), borrowing money (54%), and spending savings (50%). Younger patients were more likely than older patients to use coping strategies (p < 0.001). Lower-income patients adopted care-altering strategies more than higher-income patients (p = 0.03). Participants with more education and shorter duration of chemotherapy used lifestyle-altering strategies more than their counterparts (both p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: As a means of coping with treatment-related financial distress, patients were more likely to use lifestyle-altering approaches, but more than one-third adopted potentially harmful care-altering strategies. Younger age, lower income, higher education, and shorter duration of chemotherapy were characteristics associated with greater use of coping strategies.
BACKGROUND:Cancerpatients may experience financial distress as a side effect of their care. Little is known about which patients are at greatest risk for altering their care or lifestyle due to treatment-related financial distress. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study to determine which patients are at greatest risk for altering their care or lifestyle due to treatment-related financial distress. Eligible patients were adults receiving cancer treatment enrolled between June 2010 and May 2011. We grouped coping strategies as lifestyle altering or care altering. We assessed coping strategies and relationships between covariates using descriptive statistics and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Among 174 participants, 89% used at least one lifestyle-altering coping strategy, while 39% used a care-altering strategy. Care-altering coping strategies adopted by patients included the following: not filling a prescription (28%) and taking less medication than prescribed (23%). Lifestyle-altering strategies included the following: spending less on leisure activities (77%), spending less on basics like food and clothing (57%), borrowing money (54%), and spending savings (50%). Younger patients were more likely than older patients to use coping strategies (p < 0.001). Lower-income patients adopted care-altering strategies more than higher-income patients (p = 0.03). Participants with more education and shorter duration of chemotherapy used lifestyle-altering strategies more than their counterparts (both p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: As a means of coping with treatment-related financial distress, patients were more likely to use lifestyle-altering approaches, but more than one-third adopted potentially harmful care-altering strategies. Younger age, lower income, higher education, and shorter duration of chemotherapy were characteristics associated with greater use of coping strategies.
Authors: Christine Leopold; Anita K Wagner; Fang Zhang; Christine Y Lu; Craig C Earle; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Dennis Ross-Degnan; J Frank Wharam Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Ryan D Nipp; Amy M Shui; Giselle K Perez; Anne C Kirchhoff; Jeffrey M Peppercorn; Beverly Moy; Karen Kuhlthau; Elyse R Park Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Anna D Sinaiko; Alyna T Chien; Michael J Hassett; Pragya Kakani; Danielle Rodin; David J Meyers; Belen Fraile; Meredith B Rosenthal; Mary Beth Landrum Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2018-10-14 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Theresa A Hastert; Matthew P Banegas; Lauren M Hamel; Amanda R Reed; Tara Baird; Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer; Ann G Schwartz Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Matthew P Banegas; John F Dickerson; Erin E Kent; Janet S de Moor; Katherine S Virgo; Gery P Guy; Donatus U Ekwueme; Zhiyuan Zheng; Stephanie Nutt; Loyce Pace; Alexandra Varga; Lisa Waiwaiole; Jennifer Schneider; K Robin Yabroff Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 4.442