Literature DB >> 26149766

Drosophila melanogaster larvae make nutritional choices that minimize developmental time.

Marisa A Rodrigues1, Nelson E Martins2, Lara F Balancé1, Lara N Broom1, António J S Dias1, Ana Sofia D Fernandes1, Fábio Rodrigues1, Élio Sucena1, Christen K Mirth3.   

Abstract

Organisms from slime moulds to humans carefully regulate their macronutrient intake to optimize a wide range of life history characters including survival, stress resistance, and reproductive success. However, life history characters often differ in their response to nutrition, forcing organisms to make foraging decisions while balancing the trade-offs between these effects. To date, we have a limited understanding of how the nutritional environment shapes the relationship between life history characters and foraging decisions. To gain insight into the problem, we used a geometric framework for nutrition to assess how the protein and carbohydrate content of the larval diet affected key life history traits in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. In no-choice assays, survival from egg to pupae, female and male body size, and ovariole number - a proxy for female fecundity - were maximized at the highest protein to carbohydrate (P:C) ratio (1.5:1). In contrast, development time was minimized at intermediate P:C ratios, around 1:2. Next, we subjected larvae to two-choice tests to determine how they regulated their protein and carbohydrate intake in relation to these life history traits. Our results show that larvae targeted their consumption to P:C ratios that minimized development time. Finally, we examined whether adult females also chose to lay their eggs in the P:C ratios that minimized developmental time. Using a three-choice assay, we found that adult females preferentially laid their eggs in food P:C ratios that were suboptimal for all larval life history traits. Our results demonstrate that D. melanogaster larvae make foraging decisions that trade-off developmental time with body size, ovariole number, and survival. In addition, adult females make oviposition decisions that do not appear to benefit the larvae. We propose that these decisions may reflect the living nature of the larval nutritional environment in rotting fruit. These studies illustrate the interaction between the nutritional environment, life history traits, and foraging choices in D. melanogaster, and lend insight into the ecology of their foraging decisions.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foraging behavior; Macronutrient intake; Nutritional plasticity; Oviposition preference; Response surfaces

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26149766     DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2015.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Insect Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1910            Impact factor:   2.354


  21 in total

1.  Prothoracicotropic hormone modulates environmental adaptive plasticity through the control of developmental timing.

Authors:  MaryJane Shimell; Xueyang Pan; Francisco A Martin; Arpan C Ghosh; Pierre Leopold; Michael B O'Connor; Nuria M Romero
Journal:  Development       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 6.868

2.  Intact Drosophila central nervous system cellular quantitation reveals sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Wei Jiao; Gard Spreemann; Evelyne Ruchti; Soumya Banerjee; Samuel Vernon; Ying Shi; R Steven Stowers; Kathryn Hess; Brian D McCabe
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  A New Role for Neuropeptide F Signaling in Controlling Developmental Timing and Body Size in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Christen K Mirth; Coral G Warr; Jade R Kannangara; Michelle A Henstridge; Linda M Parsons; Shu Kondo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Population Effects of Calcium Phosphate Nanoparticles in Drosophila melanogaster: The Effects of Phase Composition, Crystallinity, and the Pathway of Formation.

Authors:  Victoria M Wu; Vuk Uskoković
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2017-09-13

5.  The seesaw of diet restriction and lifespan: lessons from Drosophila studies.

Authors:  Sudhakar Krittika; Pankaj Yadav
Journal:  Biogerontology       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.277

6.  Adaptation to new nutritional environments: larval performance, foraging decisions, and adult oviposition choices in Drosophila suzukii.

Authors:  Nuno F Silva-Soares; A Nogueira-Alves; P Beldade; Christen Kerry Mirth
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.964

7.  Nutritional geometry and fitness consequences in Drosophila suzukii, the Spotted-Wing Drosophila.

Authors:  Yvonne Young; Natasha Buckiewicz; Tristan A F Long
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-02-11       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Effects of a sex ratio gradient on female mate-copying and choosiness in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Magdalena Monier; Sabine Nöbel; Guillaume Isabel; Etienne Danchin
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.624

9.  The influence of developmental diet on reproduction and metabolism in Drosophila.

Authors:  Peter Klepsatel; Diana Knoblochová; Thirnahalli Nagaraj Girish; Heinrich Dircksen; Martina Gáliková
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  The sex-specific effects of diet quality versus quantity on morphology in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Alexander W Shingleton; Josephine R Masandika; Lily S Thorsen; Yuqing Zhu; Christen K Mirth
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.