Literature DB >> 26149748

Sterile Filtration of Highly Concentrated Protein Formulations: Impact of Protein Concentration, Formulation Composition, and Filter Material.

Andrea Allmendinger1,2, Robert Mueller1, Joerg Huwyler2, Hanns-Christian Mahler1, Stefan Fischer1.   

Abstract

Differences in filtration behavior of concentrated protein formulations were observed during aseptic drug product manufacturing of biologics dependent on formulation composition. The present study investigates filtration forces of monoclonal antibody formulations in a small-scale set-up using polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) or polyethersulfone (PES) filters. Different factors like formulation composition and protein concentration related to differences in viscosity, as well as different filtration rates were evaluated. The present study showed that filtration behavior was influenced by the presence or absence of a surfactant in the formulation, which defines the interaction between filter membrane and surface active formulation components. This can lead to a change in filter resistance (PES filter) independent on the buffer system used. Filtration behavior was additionally defined by rheological non-Newtonian flow behavior. The data showed that high shear rates resulting from small pore sizes and filtration pressure up to 1.0 bar led to shear-thinning behavior for highly concentrated protein formulations. Differences in non-Newtonian behavior were attributed to ionic strength related to differences in repulsive and attractive interactions. The present study showed that the interplay of formulation composition, filter material, and filtration rate can explain differences in filtration behavior/filtration flux observed for highly concentrated protein formulations thus guiding filter selection.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PES filter; PVDF filter; excipients; highly concentrated monoclonal antibody formulation; polysorbate; protein formulation; proteins; sterilizing-grade filter; surfactant; viscosity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26149748     DOI: 10.1002/jps.24561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  4 in total

1.  Comparative Evaluation of the Performance of Sterile Filters for Bioburden Protection and Final Fill in Biopharmaceutical Processes.

Authors:  Jimin Na; Dongwoo Suh; Young Hoon Cho; Youngbin Baek
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-16

Review 2.  Translational Applications of Hydrogels.

Authors:  Santiago Correa; Abigail K Grosskopf; Hector Lopez Hernandez; Doreen Chan; Anthony C Yu; Lyndsay M Stapleton; Eric A Appel
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 3.  Container Closure and Delivery Considerations for Intravitreal Drug Administration.

Authors:  Ashwin C Parenky; Saurabh Wadhwa; Hunter H Chen; Amardeep S Bhalla; Kenneth S Graham; Mohammed Shameem
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.246

4.  Stability of a high-concentration monoclonal antibody solution produced by liquid-liquid phase separation.

Authors:  Jack E Bramham; Stephanie A Davies; Adrian Podmore; Alexander P Golovanov
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 5.857

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.