Millie Das1, Sukhmani K Padda2, Adam Frymoyer3, Lisa Zhou2, Jonathan W Riess4, Joel W Neal2, Heather A Wakelee5. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA. 2. Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA. 5. Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Electronic address: hwakelee@stanford.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Erlotinib is a FDA approved small molecule inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor and dovitinib is a novel small molecule inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. This phase 1 trial was conducted to characterize the safety and determine the maximum tolerated dose of erlotinib plus dovitinib in patients with previously treated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: Escalating dose cohorts of daily erlotinib and dovitinib dosed 5 days on/2 days off, starting after a 2-week lead-in of erlotinib alone, were planned. A potential pharmacokinetic interaction was hypothesized as dovitinib induces CYP1A1/1A2. Only cohort 1 (150 mg erlotinib+300 mg dovitinib) and cohort -1 (150 mg erlotinib+200mg dovitinib) enrolled. Plasma concentrations of erlotinib were measured pre- and post-dovitinib exposure. RESULTS: Two of three patients in cohort 1 had a DLT (grade 3 transaminitis and grade 3 syncope). Two of 6 patients in cohort -1 had a DLT (grade 3 pulmonary embolism and grade 3 fatigue); thus, the study was terminated. Erlotinib exposure (average Cmax 2308±698 ng/ml and AUC 0-24 41,030±15,577 ng×h/ml) approximated previous reports in the six patients with pharmacokinetic analysis. However, erlotinib Cmax and AUC0-24 decreased significantly by 93% (p=0.02) and 97% (p<0.01), respectively, during dovitinib co-administration. CONCLUSIONS: This small study demonstrated considerable toxicity and a significant pharmacokinetic interaction with a marked decrease in erlotinib exposure in the presence of dovitinib, likely mediated through CYP1A1/1A2 induction. Given the toxicity and the pharmacokinetic interaction, further investigation with this drug combination will not be pursued.
INTRODUCTION:Erlotinib is a FDA approved small molecule inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor and dovitinib is a novel small molecule inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. This phase 1 trial was conducted to characterize the safety and determine the maximum tolerated dose of erlotinib plus dovitinib in patients with previously treated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: Escalating dose cohorts of daily erlotinib and dovitinib dosed 5 days on/2 days off, starting after a 2-week lead-in of erlotinib alone, were planned. A potential pharmacokinetic interaction was hypothesized as dovitinib induces CYP1A1/1A2. Only cohort 1 (150 mg erlotinib+300 mg dovitinib) and cohort -1 (150 mg erlotinib+200mg dovitinib) enrolled. Plasma concentrations of erlotinib were measured pre- and post-dovitinib exposure. RESULTS: Two of three patients in cohort 1 had a DLT (grade 3 transaminitis and grade 3 syncope). Two of 6 patients in cohort -1 had a DLT (grade 3 pulmonary embolism and grade 3 fatigue); thus, the study was terminated. Erlotinib exposure (average Cmax 2308±698 ng/ml and AUC 0-24 41,030±15,577 ng×h/ml) approximated previous reports in the six patients with pharmacokinetic analysis. However, erlotinib Cmax and AUC0-24 decreased significantly by 93% (p=0.02) and 97% (p<0.01), respectively, during dovitinib co-administration. CONCLUSIONS: This small study demonstrated considerable toxicity and a significant pharmacokinetic interaction with a marked decrease in erlotinib exposure in the presence of dovitinib, likely mediated through CYP1A1/1A2 induction. Given the toxicity and the pharmacokinetic interaction, further investigation with this drug combination will not be pursued.
Authors: Rafael Rosell; Enric Carcereny; Radj Gervais; Alain Vergnenegre; Bartomeu Massuti; Enriqueta Felip; Ramon Palmero; Ramon Garcia-Gomez; Cinta Pallares; Jose Miguel Sanchez; Rut Porta; Manuel Cobo; Pilar Garrido; Flavia Longo; Teresa Moran; Amelia Insa; Filippo De Marinis; Romain Corre; Isabel Bover; Alfonso Illiano; Eric Dansin; Javier de Castro; Michele Milella; Noemi Reguart; Giuseppe Altavilla; Ulpiano Jimenez; Mariano Provencio; Miguel Angel Moreno; Josefa Terrasa; Jose Muñoz-Langa; Javier Valdivia; Dolores Isla; Manuel Domine; Olivier Molinier; Julien Mazieres; Nathalie Baize; Rosario Garcia-Campelo; Gilles Robinet; Delvys Rodriguez-Abreu; Guillermo Lopez-Vivanco; Vittorio Gebbia; Lioba Ferrera-Delgado; Pierre Bombaron; Reyes Bernabe; Alessandra Bearz; Angel Artal; Enrico Cortesi; Christian Rolfo; Maria Sanchez-Ronco; Ana Drozdowskyj; Cristina Queralt; Itziar de Aguirre; Jose Luis Ramirez; Jose Javier Sanchez; Miguel Angel Molina; Miquel Taron; Luis Paz-Ares Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Marta Hamilton; Julie L Wolf; Jason Rusk; Shannon E Beard; Gary M Clark; Karsten Witt; Pablo J Cagnoni Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-04-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: M Hidalgo; L L Siu; J Nemunaitis; J Rizzo; L A Hammond; C Takimoto; S G Eckhardt; A Tolcher; C D Britten; L Denis; K Ferrante; D D Von Hoff; S Silberman; E K Rowinsky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Matthew D Galsky; Marshall Posner; Randall F Holcombe; Karen M Lee; Krzysztof Misiukiewicz; Che-Kai Tsao; James Godbold; Rothschild Soto; Kiev Gimpel-Tetra; Nancy Lowe; William K Oh Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Michael D Prados; Kathleen R Lamborn; Susan Chang; Eric Burton; Nicholas Butowski; Mary Malec; Ami Kapadia; Jane Rabbitt; Margaretta S Page; Ann Fedoroff; Dong Xie; Sean K Kelley Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Lecia V Sequist; James Chih-Hsin Yang; Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Kenneth O'Byrne; Vera Hirsh; Tony Mok; Sarayut Lucien Geater; Sergey Orlov; Chun-Ming Tsai; Michael Boyer; Wu-Chou Su; Jaafar Bennouna; Terufumi Kato; Vera Gorbunova; Ki Hyeong Lee; Riyaz Shah; Dan Massey; Victoria Zazulina; Mehdi Shahidi; Martin Schuler Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: K E Ware; T K Hinz; E Kleczko; K R Singleton; L A Marek; B A Helfrich; C T Cummings; D K Graham; D Astling; A-C Tan; L E Heasley Journal: Oncogenesis Date: 2013-03-25 Impact factor: 7.485
Authors: Nicole L Michmerhuizen; Megan L Ludwig; Andrew C Birkeland; Sai Nimmagadda; Jingyi Zhai; Jiayu Wang; Brittany M Jewell; Dylan Genouw; Lindsay Remer; Daniel Kim; Susan K Foltin; Apurva Bhangale; Aditi Kulkarni; Carol R Bradford; Paul L Swiecicki; Thomas E Carey; Hui Jiang; J Chad Brenner Journal: Head Neck Date: 2022-02-27 Impact factor: 3.821
Authors: Haitham AlRabiah; Adnan A Kadi; Haya I Aljohar; Mohamed W Attwa; Nasser S Al-Shakliah; Sabry M Attia; Gamal Ae Mostafa Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 4.162