Literature DB >> 26148699

Validation study of the Forgotten Joint Score-12 as a universal patient-reported outcome measure.

Mikio Matsumoto1, Tomonori Baba2, Yasuhiro Homma1, Hideo Kobayashi1, Hironori Ochi1, Takahito Yuasa1, Henrik Behrend3, Kazuo Kaneko1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) is for patients to forget their artificial joint and is reportedly a useful patient-reported outcome tool for artificial joints. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the FJS-12 is as useful as the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) or the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ) in Japan.
METHODS: All patients who visited our hospital's hip joint specialists following unilateral THA from August 2013 to July 2014 were evaluated. Medical staff members other than physicians administered three questionnaires. Items evaluated were (1) the reliability of the FJS-12 and (2) correlations between the FJS-12 and the total and subscale scores of the WOMAC or JHEQ.
RESULTS: Of 130 patients, 22 were excluded. Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.97 for the FJS-12. The FJS-12 showed a significantly lower score than the WOMAC or JHEQ (p < 0.01). The FJS-12 was moderately correlated with the total WOMAC score (r = 0.522) and its subscale scores for "stiffness" (r = 0.401) and "function" (r = 0.539) and was weakly correlated with the score for "pain" (r = 0.289). The FJS-12 was favorably correlated with the total JHEQ score (r = 0.686) and its subscale scores (r = 0.530-0.643).
CONCLUSION: The FJS-12 was correlated with and showed reliability similar to that of the JHEQ and WOMAC. The FJS-12, which is not affected by culture or lifestyle, may be useful in Japan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Forgotten Joint Score-12; JHEQ score; Patient-reported outcome; Total hip arthroplasty; WOMAC score

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26148699     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-015-1660-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  23 in total

1.  Is the Harris hip score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement?

Authors:  P Söderman; H Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Reliability and validity of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip score.

Authors:  Masaaki Kuribayashi; Kenji A Takahashi; Mikihiro Fujioka; Keiichiro Ueshima; Shigehiro Inoue; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 1.601

3.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; Sandra D M Bot; Michael R de Boer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Dirk L Knol; Joost Dekker; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical function Short-form (HOOS-PS).

Authors:  Ozlem Yilmaz; Ebru Demir Gul; Hatice Bodur
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  Reliability and validity of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire (JHEQ) for patients with hip disease.

Authors:  Taisuke Seki; Yukiharu Hasegawa; Kazuma Ikeuchi; Naoki Ishiguro; Yoshimitsu Hiejima
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 1.601

6.  Development of outcome research for total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  E Lingard; H Hashimoto; C Sledge
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.601

7.  Differences between patients' and physicians' evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J R Lieberman; F Dorey; P Shekelle; L Schumacher; B J Thomas; D J Kilgus; G A Finerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Clinimetric properties of WOMAC Index in Greek knee osteoarthritis patients: comparisons with both self-reported and physical performance measures.

Authors:  George Papathanasiou; Sophia Stasi; Leon Oikonomou; Ioanna Roussou; Effie Papageorgiou; Efstathios Chronopoulos; Nectarios Korres; Nicholas Bellamy
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 9.  Over 25 years survival after Charnley's total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jacques Caton; Jean Louis Prudhon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Association of psychological status and patient-reported physical outcome measures in joint arthroplasty: a lack of divergent validity.

Authors:  Johannes M Giesinger; Markus S Kuster; Henrik Behrend; Karlmeinrad Giesinger
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  26 in total

1.  Females, younger patients and patients with high BMI have the highest pre-operative knee awareness measured using the Forgotten Joint Score.

Authors:  Dana Li; A Troelsen; L Ingelsrud; H Husted; K Gromov
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Influence of the contralateral hip state after total hip arthroplasty on patient-reported outcomes measured with the Forgotten Joint Score-12.

Authors:  Mikio Matsumoto; Tomonori Baba; Hironori Ochi; Yu Ozaki; Taiji Watari; Yasuhiro Homma; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-04-25

3.  The best cited articles of the European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST): a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; Cyril Mauffrey; Marius M Scarlat; Patrick Simon; Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Samo K Fokter; Pierre Kehr
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-14

4.  Joint awareness after ACL reconstruction: patient-reported outcomes measured with the Forgotten Joint Score-12.

Authors:  Henrik Behrend; Vilijam Zdravkovic; Johannes M Giesinger; Karlmeinrad Giesinger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Readability of Orthopaedic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Is There a Fundamental Failure to Communicate?

Authors:  Jorge L Perez; Zachary A Mosher; Shawna L Watson; Evan D Sheppard; Eugene W Brabston; Gerald McGwin; Brent A Ponce
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury with the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Homma; Tomonori Baba; Kei Sano; Hironori Ochi; Mikio Matsumoto; Hideo Kobayashi; Takahito Yuasa; Yuichiro Maruyama; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  The Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award : No Difference in 2-year Functional Outcomes Using Kinematic versus Mechanical Alignment in TKA: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Simon W Young; Matthew L Walker; Ali Bayan; Toby Briant-Evans; Paul Pavlou; Bill Farrington
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Use of the forgotten joint score (FJS)-12 to evaluate knee awareness after isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without meniscus repair or partial meniscectomy.

Authors:  Ismail Eralp Kacmaz; Mehmet Can Gezer; Can Doruk Basa; Vadym Zhamilov; Oguzhan Ekizoglu
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-05-03

9.  Patients undergoing staged bilateral knee arthroplasty are less aware of their kinematic aligned knee compared to their mechanical knee.

Authors:  Bar Ziv Yaron; Small Ilan; Keidan Tomer; Betner Eran; Agar Gabriel; Shohat Noam
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-20

10.  Joint perception and patient perceived satisfaction after total hip and knee arthroplasty in the American population.

Authors:  Matthew Varacallo; Rajit Chakravarty; Kevin Denehy; Andrew Star
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.