Literature DB >> 26148692

Resolving future fire management conflicts using multicriteria decision making.

Don A Driscoll1,2,3, Michael Bode1,4, Ross A Bradstock5, David A Keith6,7, Trent D Penman5,8, Owen F Price5.   

Abstract

Management strategies to reduce the risks to human life and property from wildfire commonly involve burning native vegetation. However, planned burning can conflict with other societal objectives such as human health and biodiversity conservation. These conflicts are likely to intensify as fire regimes change under future climates and as growing human populations encroach farther into fire-prone ecosystems. Decisions about managing fire risks are therefore complex and warrant more sophisticated approaches than are typically used. We applied a multicriteria decision making approach (MCDA) with the potential to improve fire management outcomes to the case of a highly populated, biodiverse, and flammable wildland-urban interface. We considered the effects of 22 planned burning options on 8 objectives: house protection, maximizing water quality, minimizing carbon emissions and impacts on human health, and minimizing declines of 5 distinct species types. The MCDA identified a small number of management options (burning forest adjacent to houses) that performed well for most objectives, but not for one species type (arboreal mammal) or for water quality. Although MCDA made the conflict between objectives explicit, resolution of the problem depended on the weighting assigned to each objective. Additive weighting of criteria traded off the arboreal mammal and water quality objectives for other objectives. Multiplicative weighting identified scenarios that avoided poor outcomes for any objective, which is important for avoiding potentially irreversible biodiversity losses. To distinguish reliably among management options, future work should focus on reducing uncertainty in outcomes across a range of objectives. Considering management actions that have more predictable outcomes than landscape fuel management will be important. We found that, where data were adequate, an MCDA can support decision making in the complex and often conflicted area of fire management.
© 2015 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  WUI; fuel reduction; interfaz tierra silvestre-urbana; prescribed burning; quema prescrita; reducción de combustible; structured decision making; toma estructurada de decisiones; wildland-urban interface

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26148692     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  2 in total

1.  The 2019-2020 Australian forest fires are a harbinger of decreased prescribed burning effectiveness under rising extreme conditions.

Authors:  Hamish Clarke; Brett Cirulis; Trent Penman; Owen Price; Matthias M Boer; Ross Bradstock
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  A Two-Stage Decision Framework for Resolving Brownfield Conflicts.

Authors:  Qingye Han; Yuming Zhu; Ginger Y Ke; Hongli Lin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.