Literature DB >> 26148467

Reporting guidelines for population pharmacokinetic analyses.

Kevin Dykstra1, Nitin Mehrotra2, Christoffer Wenzel Tornøe3, Helen Kastrissios4, Bela Patel5, Nidal Al-Huniti6, Pravin Jadhav7, Yaning Wang2, Wonkyung Byon8.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to develop a consolidated set of guiding principles for the reporting of population pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses based on input from a survey of practitioners as well as discussions between industry, consulting, and regulatory scientists. The survey found that identification of population covariate effects on drug exposure and support for dose selection (in which population PK frequently serves as preparatory analysis for exposure-response modeling) are the main areas of influence for population PK analysis. The proposed guidelines consider 2 main purposes of population PK reports: (1) to present key analysis findings and their impact on drug development decisions, and (2) as documentation of the analysis methods for the dual purpose of enabling review of the analysis and facilitating future use of the models. This work also identified 2 main audiences for the reports: (1) a technically competent group responsible for in-depth review of the data, methodology, and results; and (2) a scientifically literate but not technically adept group, whose main interest is in the implications of the analysis for the broader drug development program. We recommend a generalized question-based approach with 6 questions that need to be addressed throughout the report. We recommend 8 sections (Synopsis, Introduction, Data, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusions, Appendix) with suggestions for the target audience and level of detail for each section. A section providing general expectations regarding population PK reporting from a regulatory perspective is also included. We consider this an important step toward industrialization of the field of pharmacometrics such that a nontechnical audience also understands the role of pharmacometric analyses in decision making. Population PK reports were chosen as representative reports to derive these recommendations; however, the guiding principles presented here are applicable for all pharmacometric reports including pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and simulation reports.
© 2015 The Authors. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.

Keywords:  Best practices; PK reporting; Population pharmacokinetics; Regulatory submission

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26148467     DOI: 10.1002/jcph.532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  5 in total

Review 1.  Reproducible pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 2.  Animal Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Studies (APPS) Reporting Guidelines.

Authors:  Jasbir Singh; Fawzy Elbarbry; Ke Lan; Tomasz Grabowski
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.441

3.  How publication guidelines for clinical pharmacology trials may help to accelerate knowledge transfer.

Authors:  Arne Ring; Kerstin Breithaupt-Grögler
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Modelling for policy: The five principles of the Neglected Tropical Diseases Modelling Consortium.

Authors:  Matthew R Behrend; María-Gloria Basáñez; Jonathan I D Hamley; Travis C Porco; Wilma A Stolk; Martin Walker; Sake J de Vlas
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2020-04-09

5.  What "Impact" Do NLME Publications Have Outside Our Community?

Authors:  Stefanie Hennig; Julia Fischer; Charlotte Kloft
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2020-03-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.