Literature DB >> 26148022

Predictors of early response to initial therapy in patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma.

Moritz Binder1, S Vincent Rajkumar2, Morie A Gertz2, Martha Q Lacy2, Angela Dispenzieri2, Francis K Buadi2, David Dingli2, Suzanne R Hayman2, John A Lust2, Prashant Kapoor2, Yi Lin2, Ronald S Go2, Yi L Hwa2, Robert A Kyle2, Shaji K Kumar2.   

Abstract

Response to therapy in newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma (NDMM) can impact long-term outcomes. It is not clear if baseline laboratory parameters can predict an early, deep response. Totally 1,304 patients with NDMM seen between 2001 and 2013 at Mayo Clinic Rochester were studied. The association between baseline laboratory parameters and early, deep response defined as a very good partial response or better (VGPR+) within four cycles of treatment was investigated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the associations between the parameters of interest and response. Multivariable proportional hazards regression was used to assess the association between response and overall survival. In the entire cohort, greater absolute free light chain (FLC) differences (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.48-3.82), younger age (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.28-3.71), lower hemoglobin (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.12-2.54), and IgA myeloma (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.10-2.51) were associated with increased odds of achieving VGPR+ after four cycles. Among patients receiving novel agents in general and immunomodulators in particular, these effects were more pronounced. In patients receiving proteasome-inhibitors, higher creatinine (OR 3.83, 95% CI 1.37-10.1), lower calcium (OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.36-8.35), and greater absolute FLC differences (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.10-5.71) were associated with better response. In a landmark analysis at 4 months from diagnosis, achieving VGPR+ was associated with decreased risk of subsequent mortality (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.86). In summary, several parameters were associated with an early, deep response to treatment, revealing distinct sets of predictors for immunomodulator- and proteasome-inhibitor-containing regimens. Achieving VGPR+ after four cycles translated into increased overall survival.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26148022     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  7 in total

Review 1.  Current Review on High-Risk Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Henry S H Chan; Christine I Chen; Donna E Reece
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.952

2.  Successful treatment of patients with newly diagnosed/untreated light chain multiple myeloma with a combination of bendamustine, prednisone and bortezomib (BPV).

Authors:  Hannah Tessenow; Madlen Holzvogt; Bruno Holzvogt; Marc Andrea; Simone Heyn; Thomas Schliwa; Maik Schwarz; Thomas Zehrfeld; Cornelia Becker; Christian Pfrepper; Georg Nikolaus Franke; Rainer Krahl; Madlen Jentzsch; Sabine Leiblein; Sebastian Schwind; Marius Bill; Vladan Vucinic; Thoralf Lange; Dietger Niederwieser; Wolfram Pönisch
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  The impact of response kinetics for multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents.

Authors:  Yuting Yan; Xuehan Mao; Jiahui Liu; Huishou Fan; Chenxing Du; Zengjun Li; Shuhua Yi; Yan Xu; Rui Lv; Wei Liu; Shuhui Deng; Weiwei Sui; Qi Wang; Dehui Zou; Jianxiang Wang; Tao Cheng; Fenghuang Zhan; Yu-Tzu Tai; Chenglu Yuan; Xin Du; Lugui Qiu; Kenneth C Anderson; Gang An
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-10-08

4.  Association between response kinetics and outcomes in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: analysis from TOURMALINE-MM1.

Authors:  Laurent Garderet; Jacob P Laubach; Anne-Marie Stoppa; Parameswaran Hari; Michele Cavo; Heinz Ludwig; María-Victoria Mateos; Katarina Luptakova; Jianchang Lin; Godwin Yung; Helgi van de Velde; Deborah Berg; Philippe Moreau; Paul G Richardson
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 5.  Current status of autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Rama Al Hamed; Abdul Hamid Bazarbachi; Florent Malard; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Mohamad Mohty
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 11.037

6.  Risk of Early Mortality in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Pei Hsu; Ting-Wei Lin; Jyh-Pyng Gau; Yuan-Bin Yu; Liang-Tsai Hsiao; Cheng-Hwai Tzeng; Po-Min Chen; Tzeon-Jye Chiou; Jin-Hwang Liu; Yao-Chung Liu; Chia-Jen Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Prognostic implications of abnormalities of chromosome 13 and the presence of multiple cytogenetic high-risk abnormalities in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  M Binder; S V Rajkumar; R P Ketterling; P T Greipp; A Dispenzieri; M Q Lacy; M A Gertz; F K Buadi; S R Hayman; Y L Hwa; S R Zeldenrust; J A Lust; S J Russell; N Leung; P Kapoor; R S Go; W I Gonsalves; R A Kyle; S K Kumar
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 11.037

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.