OBJECTIVE: We examined energy management during work, recovery experiences after work and their connections to health, work engagement, and job performance. METHODS: An online survey was completed by 1208 Finnish employees. Energy management was assessed through 13 strategies and recovery experiences through four experiences. As outcomes of recovery, we examined self-reported health, work engagement, and job performance. RESULTS: On average, employees applied three energy management strategies. The most beneficial strategies were work-related: shifting focus, goal setting, and helping coworkers. Both energy management and recovery experiences contributed to the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Employees benefit in terms of energy from shifting their focus to positive aspects of their jobs and demonstrating proactive social behavior at work. Recovery processes during and after work are closely connected to each other, to well-being and performance at work.
OBJECTIVE: We examined energy management during work, recovery experiences after work and their connections to health, work engagement, and job performance. METHODS: An online survey was completed by 1208 Finnish employees. Energy management was assessed through 13 strategies and recovery experiences through four experiences. As outcomes of recovery, we examined self-reported health, work engagement, and job performance. RESULTS: On average, employees applied three energy management strategies. The most beneficial strategies were work-related: shifting focus, goal setting, and helping coworkers. Both energy management and recovery experiences contributed to the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Employees benefit in terms of energy from shifting their focus to positive aspects of their jobs and demonstrating proactive social behavior at work. Recovery processes during and after work are closely connected to each other, to well-being and performance at work.
Authors: Merly K Kosenkranius; Floor A Rink; Jessica de Bloom; Machteld van den Heuvel Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 3.295