Literature DB >> 26147535

Adaptive strategies in nocturnally migrating insects and songbirds: contrasting responses to wind.

Jason W Chapman1,2, Cecilia Nilsson3, Ka S Lim1, Johan Bäckman3, Don R Reynolds1,4, Thomas Alerstam3.   

Abstract

Animals that use flight as their mode of transportation must cope with the fact that their migration and orientation performance is strongly affected by the flow of the medium they are moving in, that is by the winds. Different strategies can be used to mitigate the negative effects and benefit from the positive effects of a moving flow. The strategies an animal can use will be constrained by the relationship between the speed of the flow and the speed of the animal's own propulsion in relation to the surrounding air. Here we analyse entomological and ornithological radar data from north-western Europe to investigate how two different nocturnal migrant taxa, the noctuid moth Autographa gamma and songbirds, deal with wind by analysing variation in resulting flight directions in relation to the wind-dependent angle between the animal's heading and track direction. Our results, from fixed locations along the migratory journey, reveal different global strategies used by moths and songbirds during their migratory journeys. As expected, nocturnally migrating moths experienced a greater degree of wind drift than nocturnally migrating songbirds, but both groups were more affected by wind in autumn than in spring. The songbirds' strategies involve elements of both drift and compensation, providing some benefits from wind in combination with destination and time control. In contrast, moths expose themselves to a significantly higher degree of drift in order to obtain strong wind assistance, surpassing the songbirds in mean ground speed, at the cost of a comparatively lower spatiotemporal migratory precision. Moths and songbirds show contrasting but adaptive responses to migrating through a moving flow, which are fine-tuned to the respective flight capabilities of each group in relation to the wind currents they travel within.
© 2015 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2015 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autographa gamma; drift compensation; flight behaviour; noctuid moths; passerines; seasonal migration; windborne migration

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26147535     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  10 in total

1.  Compensation for wind drift during raptor migration improves with age through mortality selection.

Authors:  Fabrizio Sergio; Jomar M Barbosa; Alessandro Tanferna; Rafa Silva; Julio Blas; Fernando Hiraldo
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 19.100

2.  Innovative Visualizations Shed Light on Avian Nocturnal Migration.

Authors:  Judy Shamoun-Baranes; Andrew Farnsworth; Bart Aelterman; Jose A Alves; Kevin Azijn; Garrett Bernstein; Sérgio Branco; Peter Desmet; Adriaan M Dokter; Kyle Horton; Steve Kelling; Jeffrey F Kelly; Hidde Leijnse; Jingjing Rong; Daniel Sheldon; Wouter Van den Broeck; Jan Klaas Van Den Meersche; Benjamin Mark Van Doren; Hans van Gasteren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Nocturnally migrating songbirds drift when they can and compensate when they must.

Authors:  Kyle G Horton; Benjamin M Van Doren; Phillip M Stepanian; Wesley M Hochachka; Andrew Farnsworth; Jeffrey F Kelly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Long-distance migratory shorebirds travel faster towards their breeding grounds, but fly faster post-breeding.

Authors:  Sjoerd Duijns; Alexandra M Anderson; Yves Aubry; Amanda Dey; Scott A Flemming; Charles M Francis; Christian Friis; Cheri Gratto-Trevor; Diana J Hamilton; Rebecca Holberton; Stephanie Koch; Ann E McKellar; David Mizrahi; Christy A Morrissey; Sarah G Neima; David Newstead; Larry Niles; Erica Nol; Julie Paquet; Jennie Rausch; Lindsay Tudor; Yves Turcotte; Paul A Smith
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Travel routes to remote ocean targets reveal the map sense resolution for a marine migrant.

Authors:  Graeme C Hays; Nadine Atchison-Balmond; Giulia Cerritelli; Jacques-Olivier Laloë; Paolo Luschi; Jeanne A Mortimer; Alex Rattray; Nicole Esteban
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.293

Review 6.  Orientation in high-flying migrant insects in relation to flows: mechanisms and strategies.

Authors:  Andy M Reynolds; Don R Reynolds; Sanjay P Sane; Gao Hu; Jason W Chapman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Wind-Related Orientation Patterns in Diurnal, Crepuscular and Nocturnal High-Altitude Insect Migrants.

Authors:  Gao Hu; Ka Sing Lim; Don R Reynolds; Andy M Reynolds; Jason W Chapman
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Miniaturized multi-sensor loggers provide new insight into year-round flight behaviour of small trans-Sahara avian migrants.

Authors:  Felix Liechti; Silke Bauer; Kiran L Dhanjal-Adams; Tamara Emmenegger; Pavel Zehtindjiev; Steffen Hahn
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.600

9.  Flight Performance of Mamestra brassicae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Under Different Biotic and Abiotic Conditions.

Authors:  Jiang-Long Guo; Xiao-Kang Li; Xiu-Jing Shen; Meng-Lun Wang; Kong-Ming Wu
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 1.857

10.  Environmental drivers of annual population fluctuations in a trans-Saharan insect migrant.

Authors:  Gao Hu; Constanti Stefanescu; Tom H Oliver; David B Roy; Tom Brereton; Chris Van Swaay; Don R Reynolds; Jason W Chapman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.