Literature DB >> 26147086

Intratester and Intertester Reliability of Toe Pressure Measurements in People with and Without Diabetes Performed by Podiatric Physicians.

Jennifer A Sonter, Vivienne Chuter, Sarah Casey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Toe pressures and the toe brachial index (TBI) represent possible screening tools for peripheral arterial disease; however, limited evidence is available regarding their reliability. The aim of this study was to determine intratester and intertester reliability of toe systolic pressure and the TBI in participants with and without diabetes performed by podiatric physicians.
METHODS: Two podiatric physicians performed toe and brachial pressure measurements on 80 participants, 40 with and 40 without diabetes, during two testing sessions using photoplethysmography and Doppler probe. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and 95% limits of agreement were determined.
RESULTS: In people with diabetes, intratester reliability of toe pressure measurement was excellent for both testers (ICCs, 0.84 and 0.82). Reliability of the TBI was good (ICCs, 0.72 and 0.75) and brachial pressure fair (ICCs, 0.43 and 0.55). The intertester reliability of toe pressure (ICC, 0.82) and the TBI (ICC, 0.80) was excellent. Intertester reliability of brachial pressure was reduced in people with diabetes (ICC, 0.49). In age-matched participants, intratester reliability of toe pressure measurement was excellent for both testers (ICCs, 0.83 and 0.87), and reliability of the TBI (ICCs, 0.74 and 0.80) and brachial pressure (ICCs, 0.73 and 0.78) was good to excellent. Intertester reliability of toe pressure (ICC, 0.84), the TBI (ICC, 0.81), and brachial pressure (ICC, 0.77) was excellent.
CONCLUSIONS: Toe pressures and the TBI demonstrated excellent reliability in people with and without diabetes and can be an effective component of lower-extremity vascular screening. However, wide limits of agreement relative to blood pressure values for both cohorts indicate that results should be interpreted with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26147086     DOI: 10.7547/0003-0538-105.3.201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc        ISSN: 1930-8264


  8 in total

1.  Peripheral arterial disease screening and diagnostic practice: A scoping review.

Authors:  Cornelius M Donohue; Joseph V Adler; Laura L Bolton
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Cross-sectional correlations between the toe brachial index and lower limb complications in older people.

Authors:  Jennifer A Sonter; Vivienne H Chuter
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Diastolic versus systolic ankle-brachial pressure index using ultrasound imaging & automated oscillometric measurement in diabetic patients with calcified and non-calcified lower limb arteries.

Authors:  Akram M Asbeutah; Abdullah A AlMajran; Sami K Asfar
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  A targeted screening method for non-invasive vascular assessment of the lower limb.

Authors:  Peta Ellen Tehan; Vivienne Helaine Chuter
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  How does a short period of exercise effect toe pressures and toe-brachial indices? A cross-sectional exploratory study.

Authors:  Peta Ellen Tehan; Sean George Sadler; Sean Michael Lanting; Vivienne Helaine Chuter
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of resting systolic toe pressure for diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease in people with and without diabetes: a cross-sectional retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Peta Ellen Tehan; Alex Louise Barwick; Mathew Sebastian; Vivienne Helaine Chuter
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  The ankle brachial index in people with and without diabetes: intra-tester reliability.

Authors:  Sarah Louise Casey; Sean Michael Lanting; Vivienne Helaine Chuter
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  The reliability of the ankle brachial index: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Casey; Sean Lanting; Christopher Oldmeadow; Vivienne Chuter
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 2.303

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.