Literature DB >> 26146607

An improved understanding of cancer genomics through massively parallel sequencing.

Jamie K Teer1.   

Abstract

DNA sequencing technology advances have enabled genetic investigation of more samples in a shorter time than has previously been possible. Furthermore, the ability to analyze and understand large sequencing datasets has improved due to concurrent advances in sequence data analysis methods and software tools. Constant improvements to both technology and analytic approaches in this fast moving field are evidenced by many recent publications of computational methods, as well as biological results linking genetic events to human disease. Cancer in particular has been the subject of intense investigation, owing to the genetic underpinnings of this complex collection of diseases. New massively-parallel sequencing (MPS) technologies have enabled the investigation of thousands of samples, divided across tens of different tumor types, resulting in new driver gene identification, mutagenic pattern characterization, and other newly uncovered features of tumor biology. This review will focus both on methods and recent results: current analytical approaches to DNA and RNA sequencing will be presented followed by a review of recent pan-cancer sequencing studies. This overview of methods and results will not only highlight the recent advances in cancer genomics, but also the methods and tools used to accomplish these advancements in a constantly and rapidly improving field.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioinformatics; Cancer Genomics; ICGC; Massively-Parallel Sequencing; Mutagenesis; Sequence Analysis DNA; Sequence Analysis RNA; TCGA

Year:  2014        PMID: 26146607      PMCID: PMC4486294          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-676X.2014.05.05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Cancer Res        ISSN: 2218-676X            Impact factor:   1.241


  147 in total

1.  A vision for the future of genomics research.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Eric D Green; Alan E Guttmacher; Mark S Guyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Synonymous mutations frequently act as driver mutations in human cancers.

Authors:  Fran Supek; Belén Miñana; Juan Valcárcel; Toni Gabaldón; Ben Lehner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Lessons from the cancer genome.

Authors:  Levi A Garraway; Eric S Lander
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Performance of mutation pathogenicity prediction methods on missense variants.

Authors:  Janita Thusberg; Ayodeji Olatubosun; Mauno Vihinen
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 4.878

5.  APOBEC3B is an enzymatic source of mutation in breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael B Burns; Lela Lackey; Michael A Carpenter; Anurag Rathore; Allison M Land; Brandon Leonard; Eric W Refsland; Delshanee Kotandeniya; Natalia Tretyakova; Jason B Nikas; Douglas Yee; Nuri A Temiz; Duncan E Donohue; Rebecca M McDougle; William L Brown; Emily K Law; Reuben S Harris
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma.

Authors:  A G Knudson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A comparison of methods for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data.

Authors:  Charlotte Soneson; Mauro Delorenzi
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  SNAP: predict effect of non-synonymous polymorphisms on function.

Authors:  Yana Bromberg; Burkhard Rost
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  MOSAIK: a hash-based algorithm for accurate next-generation sequencing short-read mapping.

Authors:  Wan-Ping Lee; Michael P Stromberg; Alistair Ward; Chip Stewart; Erik P Garrison; Gabor T Marth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison of software packages for detecting differential expression in RNA-seq studies.

Authors:  Fatemeh Seyednasrollah; Asta Laiho; Laura L Elo
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 11.622

View more
  4 in total

1.  Novel diagnostic technologies for clinical and frontline use: Advanced diagnostics based on molecular markers and analysis technologies has been improving diagnosis across a wide range of diseases.

Authors:  Philip Hunter
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Core Competencies in Cancer Genomics for Healthcare Professionals: Results From a Systematic Literature Review and a Delphi Process.

Authors:  Ilda Hoxhaj; Alessia Tognetto; Anna Acampora; Jovana Stojanovic; Stefania Boccia
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 1.771

3.  Massively parallel sequencing of cell-free DNA in plasma for detecting gynaecological tumour-associated copy number alteration.

Authors:  Makoto Nakabayashi; Akihiro Kawashima; Rika Yasuhara; Yosuke Hayakawa; Shingo Miyamoto; Chiaki Iizuka; Akihiko Sekizawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Exosomal lncRNA PVT1/VEGFA Axis Promotes Colon Cancer Metastasis and Stemness by Downregulation of Tumor Suppressor miR-152-3p.

Authors:  Shiue-Wei Lai; Ming-Yao Chen; Oluwaseun Adebayo Bamodu; Ming-Shou Hsieh; Ting-Yi Huang; Chi-Tai Yeh; Wei-Hwa Lee; Yih-Giun Cherng
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 6.543

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.