Literature DB >> 2614658

Computerized adaptive personality assessment: an illustration with the Absorption scale.

N G Waller1, S P Reise.   

Abstract

This article introduces the theory behind and applications of adaptive personality assessment based on the item response theory. Two adaptive testing strategies were compared: (a) fixed test length and (b) clinical decision. Real-data simulations, based on the item responses from 1,000 subjects who had previously taken the 34-item Absorption scale (Tellegen, 1982) by means of paper-and-pencil format, were used to illustrate these strategies. Results suggest that computerized adaptive personality assessment works impressively well. With the fixed-test-length strategy, a 50% savings in administered items was achieved with little loss of measurement precision. In the clinical-decision testing strategy, individuals who were extreme on the Absorption trait were identified with perfect accuracy using, on average, 25% of the available items. The implications of these results for personality research and assessment are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2614658     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.57.6.1051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  10 in total

Review 1.  Dynamic assessment of health outcomes: time to let the CAT out of the bag?

Authors:  Karon F Cook; Kimberly J O'Malley; Toni S Roddey
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Genetic and environmental influences on item response pattern scalability.

Authors:  N G Waller; S P Reise
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.805

3.  An accurate and efficient identification of children with psychosocial problems by means of computerized adaptive testing.

Authors:  Antonius G C Vogels; Gert W Jacobusse; Symen A Reijneveld
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Development of a computerized adaptive screening tool for overall psychopathology ("p").

Authors:  Tyler M Moore; Monica E Calkins; Theodore D Satterthwaite; David R Roalf; Adon F G Rosen; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.791

5.  Sources of Error in IRT Trait Estimation.

Authors:  Leah M Feuerstahler
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-10-06

6.  Computerized adaptive assessment of personality disorder: introducing the CAT-PD project.

Authors:  Leonard J Simms; Lewis R Goldberg; John E Roberts; David Watson; John Welte; Jane H Rotterman
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2011-07

7.  Computer adaptive testing of liability to addiction: identifying individuals at risk.

Authors:  Levent Kirisci; Ralph Tarter; Maureen Reynolds; Ty Ridenour; Clement Stone; Michael Vanyukov
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Endorsement frequencies and factor structure of DSM-III-R and DSM-IV Generalized Anxiety Disorder symptoms in women: implications for future research, classification, clinical practice and comorbidity.

Authors:  Thomas S Kubarych; Steven H Aggen; John M Hettema; Kenneth S Kendler; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.035

9.  Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): depression, anxiety, and anger.

Authors:  Paul A Pilkonis; Seung W Choi; Steven P Reise; Angela M Stover; William T Riley; David Cella
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2011-06-21

10.  A proof of principle for using adaptive testing in Routine Outcome Monitoring: the efficiency of the Mood and Anxiety Symptoms Questionnaire -Anhedonic Depression CAT.

Authors:  Niels Smits; Frans G Zitman; Pim Cuijpers; Margien E den Hollander-Gijsman; Ingrid V E Carlier
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 4.615

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.