The Role of Cardiac MRI in Patients with Troponin-Positive Chest Pain and Unobstructed Coronary Arteries.

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) still remains one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Seven to fifteen percent of patients presenting with ACS have unobstructed coronary artery disease (CAD) on urgent angiography. Patients with ACS and unobstructed coronary arteries represent a clinical dilemma and their diagnosis and management is quite variable in current practice. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging with its unique non-invasive myocardial tissue characterization property has the potential to identify underlying etiologies and reach a final diagnosis. These include acute and chronic myocarditis, embolic/spontaneous recanalization myocardial infarction, and Tako-Tsubo cardiomyopathy, and other conditions. Establishing a final diagnosis has a direct implication on patient's management and prognosis. In this article, we have reviewed the current evidence on the diagnostic role of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with ACS and unobstructed coronary arteries. We have also highlighted the potential role of CMR as a risk stratification or prognostication tool for this patient population.

Introduction

Globally, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) still remains one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity. Emergency or early angiography is recommended in suspected ACS with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or in non-ST elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) with an intermediate-high Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score. The literature suggests that 7–10 % of patients presenting with STEMI and 10–15 % of patients presenting with NSTE-ACS have unobstructed coronary artery disease (CAD) on urgent angiography [1-8]. Patients with ACS and unobstructed coronary arteries represent a clinical dilemma and their management is quite variable in current practice. Secondary prevention medications for ACS are used less frequently in these patients than in patients with obstructive CAD [9, 10]. This is partly due to our lack of understanding of the underlying patho-physiological mechanisms leading to the troponin rise and the lack of clear-cut guidelines. A common clinical misconception is that patients in this group have a relatively good prognosis in comparison with patients with an MI with obstructive CAD; several studies have shown that the mortality rate or re-infarction is not negligible following ACS with unobstructed CAD [8, 10–13, 14•]. A recent systematic review of patients presenting with suspected MI and unobstructed coronary arteries by Pasupathy et al. showed an overall all-cause mortality of 4.7 % at 12 months [15••]. Several recent studies have shown that additional imaging like cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may be particularly useful in determining the diagnosis. Accurate diagnosis helps to tailor medical treatment, for example the diagnosis of a non-ischemic underlying etiology may obviate the need for anti-platelet and anti-atherosclerotic therapies.

CMR in ACS and Unobstructed Coronaries

Three possible etiologies explain the clinical presentation in up to 95 % of cases of acute chest pain, elevated troponin, and unobstructed coronary arteries [16–18, 19••, 20•, 21••, 22•, 23•, 24•, 25•]. These include: (1) acute myocarditis, (2) acute MI, and (3) cardiomyopathy, in particular Tako-Tsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM). All of these conditions can be easily diagnosed with an appropriately tailored CMR study.

CMR diagnostic accuracy is based on the use of a number of different sequences, which includes—long- and short-axis cine, and T2-weighted and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging repeated in the same slice positions as the cine imaging. These three sequences assess the presence of regional wall motion abnormalities and ventricular volumes calculation, presence, and extent of myocardial edema/inflammation and myocardial scar/fibrosis, respectively.

First-pass perfusion and T1 and T2 mapping sequences can be added depending on the clinical question or the research interest (Table 1). This will result in a total scan duration time of ∼45 min. [26••]

Table 1

CMR protocol in Patients with ACS and unobstructed coronaries [26••]

SEQUENCES	CLINICAL APPLICATION
1. Cines (short and long axis)	LV/RV functionRegional wall motion abnormality
2. T2-weighted imaging	Myocardial edema
3. Optional—first-pass perfusion at rest	Myocardial hyperemiaMVO
4. Early gadolinium enhancement	MVOLV Thrombus
5. Late gadolinium enhancement	Scar/fibrosisPattern of LGE
6. Advanced tissue characterization sequences (e.g. T2 mapping, T1 mapping for native T1 and ECV	Myocardial edemaMyocardial fibrosis

ACS acute coronary syndrome, LV left ventricle, RV right ventricle, MVO microvascular obstruction, LGE late gadolinium enhancement, ECV extracellular volume of distribution

All of the three acute pathologies (myocarditis, MI, or TCM) cause myocardial injury leading to edema. Edema in CMR corresponds to an increase in the T2 relaxation time which can be delineated with T2-weighted imaging [27]. There are various sequences available for delineation of myocardial edema. T2-weighted short-tau inversion recovery (T2-STIR) is the most commonly used sequence to image edema in clinical practice. However, T2-STIR image quality is easily degraded with respiratory motion or tachyarrhythmia, which are both common in patients with ACS and unobstructed coronaries (Fig. 1). Newer sequences such as ACUT2E (cardiac unified T2 edema) and T2 mapping are less prone to such artefacts. However, a recent study by McAlindon et al. demonstrated that the different methods for detecting and quantifying myocardial edema are not interchangeable, and that T2 mapping was the most reproducible method, albeit this sequence comparison was done just in the context of STEMI [28••].

Fig. 1

A 24-year old man with acute myocarditis. a and b T2 STIR images of four- and two-chamber long-axis views showing non-diagnostic images due to tachycardia. c and d T2 Mapping images of four- and two-chamber long-axis views showing diffuse global myocardial edema with sparing of the basal septum

Three CMR sequences have diagnostic role in patients suspected with myocarditis: (1) LGE sequences for detection of myocardial necrosis and/or fibrosis, (2) T2-weighted images for assessment of myocardial edema, and (3) T1-weighted sequences before and after contrast injection for detection of myocardial hyperemia (Fig. 2). Myocardial infarction can be diagnosed on CMR by identifying a subendocardial or transmural LGE pattern (Fig. 3) [29] whereas TCM can be diagnosed by the characteristic mid-apical myocardial edema with corresponding regional wall motion abnormalities and apical ballooning, but with no or only subtle LGE (Fig. 4).

Fig. 2

Acute myocarditis in a 38-year male. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequence (white arrows) showing a patchy and diffuse epicardial LGE in the basal and mid-cavity lateral wall (a). T2−weighted images of same patient showing increased myocardial signal intensity (red arrows) of the basal and mid-cavity epicardial lateral wall (b) signifying myocardial edema

Fig. 3

A 63-year-old man with small transmural myocardial infarction in the distal anterior and anterolateral walls. T2-weighted images showing small area of myocardial edema in the apical anterior and lateral walls, corresponding to the distal LAD territory (a). LGE images showing transmural infarction in the distal anterior and anterolateral walls (b)

Fig. 4

A 70-year-old lady with Tako-Tsubo cardiomyopathy. a Four-chamber view showing mid-apical myocardial edema in T2-weighted sequences. b No evidence of significant LGE in the T1-weighted inversion recovery post-contrast sequences

Although a number of retrospective and prospective clinical studies have reported the diagnostic role of CMR in this patient cohort, the diagnostic pick-up rate is variable. This could be attributed to the time delay between CMR imaging from the acute presentation, as well as the CMR sequences and imaging protocol used.

Role of CMR in Diagnosis

Acute Myocarditis

Several studies have shown that the commonest underlying etiology of patients presenting with suspected ACS and unobstructed coronary arteries is myocarditis. The prevalence of myocarditis is variable and ranges from 15 to 75 % [16–18, 19••, 20•, 21••, 22•, 23•, 24•, 25•]. This large variation is probably due to the CMR imaging sequences being used and the timing of the scan from the acute presentation. The use of T2-weighted images for assessment of myocardial edema/inflammation and imaging patients early from the onset of symptoms increases the diagnostic pick-up rate given that some abnormalities as myocardial edema/inflammation may be reversible and resolve with time. Use of T2-weighted images for assessment of myocardial edema and scanning the patients within 2 weeks from the onset of symptom increases the diagnostic pick up rate [30••].

The non-invasive imaging diagnosis of myocarditis and myocardial inflammation always represented a diagnostic challenge because diagnosis is based on indirect signs like myocardial swelling, wall motion abnormality, and pericardial effusion, particularly with echocardiography [31]. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) still represents the gold standard for the diagnosis of myocarditis. Recently, several studies have validated CMR against EMB [18, 32••, 33], suggesting that CMR can have a promising role in the diagnostic pathway of these patients [34-39].

EMB is an invasive procedure and not widely available and has several limitations including low sensitivity and specificity due to sampling errors. This has fostered the increasing interest on the role of CMR in these patients. A recent Expert Position Statement of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) confirms the important diagnostic role of CMR in patients with suspected myocarditis [40••]. Whilst CMR cannot replace EMB, there is agreement that it can be offered in clinically stable patients prior to EMB. CMR-guided EMB, i.e. obtaining the biopsy specimen from the LGE scar, can improve the diagnostic rate of the disease, as demonstrated by Mahrholdt et al. [41].

Recently, a consensus paper has defined the recommendations on the use of CMR in myocarditis [42] which led the establishment of the “Lake Louise criteria” diagnostic criteria. In particular, the CMR findings are consistent with the diagnosis of myocarditis if two of three sequences demonstrating myocardial edema, hyperemia, and fibrosis are positive.

Novel parametric mapping techniques like, native T1 mapping, extracellular volumes of distribution (ECV) and T2 mapping, currently mainly used for research, have recently shown promising results in the diagnostic assessment of myocarditis [43••]. Recent studies by Ferreira and Piechnik et al. [44••, 45••] demonstrated that native T1 mapping has a superior diagnostic role compared to conventional T2-weighted imaging, and an equivalent performance to LGE. Native T1 mapping can also display the typical non-ischemic patterns in acute myocarditis, without the need for gadolinium contrast agents [46••]. Radunski et al. recently demonstrated the utility of ECV quantification, as a measure of interstitial fibrosis in both acute and subacute, severe myocarditis [47••]. They compared the diagnostic performance of T2, T1, and ECV as novel quantitative tissue markers compared to the Lake Louise criteria. ECV quantification together with LGE imaging significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of CMR compared with the Lake Louise criteria [47••].

Embolic MI/MI with Spontaneous Recanalisation

Acute MI with unobstructed coronary artery is a common clinical situation and is the second most common etiology in this cohort of patients (5–29 %) [16–18, 19••, 20•, 21••, 22•, 23•, 24•, 25•]. Several different patho-physiological mechanisms have been proposed to explain this phenomenon, e.g. rupture or erosion of a vulnerable plaque (causing transitory occlusion that resolves spontaneously, without leaving any residual visible intracoronary lesion), and distal vessels or small-caliber side branches disease. Other mechanisms including distal embolisation, coronary vasospasm, inflammation, or coronary dissections are rarely associated. Myocardial infarction can be diagnosed on CMR by identifying either a subendocardial or transmural LGE pattern in a typical coronary artery territory [29]. CMR can provide information on whether the myocardial infarction is acute/sub-acute orchronic. Acute ischaemic myocardial injury leads to myocardial edema, which can be delineated with T2-weighted imaging. Establishing the diagnosis in the presence of MI with unobstructed coronary arteries is very important, particularly so that appropriate management can be tailored. This can represent a plaque event or an extra-coronary embolic event. Review of coronary angiogram and coronary plaques, and excluding other sources of emboli (for example: exclude a patent foramen ovale as a potential contributor to a paradoxical embolic MI) often follows this diagnosis by CMR.

Patients with acute MI need long-term clinical follow-up and secondary atherosclerotic prevention treatment. In addition, CMR can provide further valuable prognostic information in this setting, including myocardial wall motion, global function, perfusion, and viability.

Cardiomyopathy

Cardiomyopathy is the third common cause of suspected ACS with unobstructed coronary arteries. According to literature TCM is the most frequent and occurs in 10–15 % of this patients group [16–18, 19••, 20•, 21••, 22•, 23•, 24•, 25•]. Occasionally, dilated cardiomyopathy or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy may also present with chest pain with unobstructed coronaries.

TCM or stress cardiomyopathy is a subtype of MI with unobstructed coronary artery, and defined by the characteristic wall motion abnormality that is, by definition, reversible and transient. The condition usually has a favorable prognosis compared to the other conditions. It is often, but not always, provoked by an emotional stress or respiratory distress. Several mechanisms have been hypothesized for TCM, including plaque disruption, multivessel spasm, baroreflex abnormalities, and catecholamine toxicity. It remains unclear whether TCM occurs due to one or multiple mechanisms in individual patients.

TCM is characterized by mid-cavity to apical regional wall motion abnormalities (“apical ballooning”) with sparing of the left ventricular basal segments. This can be identified by LV angiogram, as well as transthoracic echocardiography. The added diagnostic value of CMR is in its (1) high spatial resolution, 3D image acquisition, and (2) non-invasive myocardial tissue characterization. The former results in a clear detection of cardiac chambers and endocardial contours, whilst the latter allows the detection of myocardial edema (markedly present in TCM) and myocardial scarring (usually absent in TCM) [48••]. Typically, T2-weighted sequences are used to image myocardial edema and it commonly identifies the presence of circumferential and transmural myocardial edema of the apical to mid-cavity myocardium matching with the regional wall motion abnormalities [49••]. Since myocardial edema is a transient phenomenon, it is advisable that CMR imaging is carried out within the first few weeks from the acute presentation. Myocardial edema resolves in 2–3 months without any myocardial scarring and with complete functional recovery [49••]. A few studies have shown the presence of subtle late gadolinium enhancement in TCM [50•], but experimental data shows that delayed washout of gadolinium may be caused by increased interstitial water content such that associated with transient myocardial edema [51]. The subtle changes are called myocardial edema-related LGE and they do not represent myocardial necrosis. The distribution of myocardial edema matching the wall motion abnormalities with no or subtle LGE helps in distinguishing TCM from myocardial infarction and myocarditis.

Risk Stratification with CMR in ACS with Unobstructed Coronaries

ACS with unobstructed coronary arteries is a common clinical entity encountered in day-to-day clinical practice. The mean age of presentation is usually lower than ACS with obstructed coronaries [52•]. Except for cigarette smoking [53], the common risk factors for CAD such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia are less present than in the obstructed coronary artery group [54]. ACS with unobstructed coronaries poses a clinical dilemma, as the underlying diagnosis is variable and often unclear. Accurate diagnosis is not only important for initiation of appropriate treatment, but may also have long-term implications for the patient. Contrary to popular belief, the 1-year mortality in the overall group was shown to be non-negligible in a recent systematic review [15••]. Diagnosis is crucial as a completely normal CMR scan is associated with a good prognosis as demonstrated by the study by Chopard et al. [21••]. CMR and its unique non-invasive myocardial tissue characterization do not just have a diagnostic role but it has a potential role in risk stratification.

Risk Stratification in Myocarditis

Clinical presentation of myocarditis can be varied ranging from benign disease with preserved cardiac function to more aggressive form associated with severe LV/RV dysfunction (like giant cell myocarditis). Recent literature on myocarditis delineates its possible malignant side. Myocarditis was the third leading cause of sudden death after hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and congenital/atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, as demonstrated in a clinical case series of sudden deaths in young competitive athletes [55]. Myocarditis is responsible for 5 to 20 % of sudden deaths as demonstrated in the autopsy studies of young adults [56]. It may also resolve spontaneously without specific treatment in patients presenting with mild symptoms and minimal ventricular dysfunction [40••]. In up to 30 % of cases, biopsy-proven myocarditis can progress to DCM and is associated with a poor prognosis [40••]. CMR with its superior tissue characterization property can delineate the severity of myocarditis, thereby guiding in the management and in risk stratification. A recent study by Grun et al. has shown the presence of LGE is the best independent predictor of all-cause mortality and of cardiac mortality in 222 consecutive patients with biopsy proven viral myocarditis [57••]. LGE performed better than the traditional markers like LV ejection fraction, LV end diastolic volume, and NYHA symptom class. Moreover, normal CMR in patients with clinically suspected myocarditis, is associated with a good prognosis independent of their clinical symptoms and other findings [58••]. Thus CMR may help to distinguish a benign from malignant form of myocarditis. Prompt CMR diagnosis of an aggressive myocarditis may led to in initiation of appropriate therapy like immunosuppressants, early referral for myocardial biopsy or help in MR guided biopsy. Response to immunosuppressive therapy has been reported mainly in chronic virus-negative forms, in giant cell myocarditis, and in active myocarditis defined as autoimmune (e.g. virus-negative and autoantibody positive) [40••].

Risk Stratification in MI

CMR can also help in risk stratification in MI. In addition to help achieving the diagnosis, the better tissue characterization properties allow accurate assessment of infarct size (LGE) and myocardial salvage. The area of myocardial edema delineated by T2-weighted CMR corresponds to the myocardial area at risk (AAR). The presence and extent of myocardial salvage can also be derived with CMR by subtracting the infarcted area from the AAR [59]. There is increasing data on the prognostic value of CMR-derived infarct size and myocardial salvage [60, 61•]. Microvascular obstruction (MVO), characterized by hypoenhanced core within myocardial infarction scar (hyperenhancement) on rest first-pass perfusion or LGE imaging, can occasionally be demonstrated. The presence and extent of MVO after AMI is associated with adverse LV remodeling and poor clinical outcome [62-64], and myocardial segments with MVO at presentation are more likely to develop wall thinning and fail to demonstrate functional recovery [65]. Nijveldt et al. confirmed that MVO in LGE proved a more powerful predictor of global and regional functional recovery than the transmural extent of infarction.

CMR can potentially diagnose the complications of MI. CMR is superior to echocardiography for the identification of ventricular thrombi, particularly when they are small and apical. They are easily identifiable early after contrast administration when both the cavity and the myocardium still appear bright, whilst the thrombus appears hypointense (lack of contrast uptake given that it is avascular) [66, 67]. CMR is also able to detect other complications of MI including ventricular aneurysm, pseudoaneurysm, papillary muscle infarction with subsequent mitral regurgitation, etc.

Risk Stratification in TCM

Although TCM is usually considered to be a benign reversible condition, its arrhythmic risk is increasingly recognized. There are promising new CMR analyses which may help to risk stratify the patients with potential higher arrhythmic risk [68••].

Deep T-wave inversion and QTc interval prolongation on ECG may be observed in TCM [69•, 70]. Malignant arrhythmias including torsades de pointes (TdP) caused by repolarization abnormalities and QTc prolongation, can be seen in up to 8 % of cases [71••]. In one meta-analysis, sudden cardiac death (SCD) after TCM has been reported in 1.1 % during the index episode, with a further 0.5 % of patients suffering a SCD weeks to months later [72••]. The study primarily looked at the relationship between TCM and ventricular arrhythmias, reviewing a total 816 published cases. VF was reported in 15 cases (prevalence of 1.8 %) and VT was reported in 18 (2.2 %) [72••].

The T-wave inversion and QT interval prolongation in typical TCM is thought to be caused by an intra-cardiac gradient (apico-basal) of myocardial edema which, in turn, gives rise to regional dispersion of action potential durations [73]. A study by Perazzolo Marra et al. looked at the ECG and CMR findings in 20 consecutive TCM patients. A linear correlation of the apical-basal ratio of T2-weighted signal intensity with ECG repolarization indices such as negative T-wave magnitude, sum of the amplitudes of negative T-waves, and maximum corrected QT interval has been shown [49••]. Interestingly, the repolarization changes were unrelated to either late gadolinium enhancement or quantitative cine parameters. Hence, the T2-weighted signal intensity gradient can be potentially used as a marker of malignant arrhythmia.

CMR can also provide additional information on the presence of LV apical thrombus, valvular abnormalities, and LV outflow tract obstruction. Some of these findings are also directly linked to adverse prognosis.

Conclusion

In the context of ACS with unobstructed coronary arteries, CMR has a potentially important diagnostic role, especially in distinguishing ischemic from non-ischemic causes, thereby guiding management. CMR can also potentially help in risk stratification or prognostication in this cohort. Hence, it should be strongly considered in all patients presenting with troponin-positive chest pain with unobstructed coronaries aiming at achieving a final diagnosis. However, this is yet to be translated into routine clinical practice, particular within institutions, which do not have readily access to CMR.