Jon M Hussey1, Quynh C Nguyen2, Eric A Whitsel3, Liana J Richardson4, Carolyn Tucker Halpern1, Penny Gordon-Larsen5, Joyce W Tabor6, Pamela P Entzel7, Kathleen Mullan Harris4. 1. Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill ; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill ; Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 4. Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill ; Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 5. Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill ; Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 6. Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 7. Department of Veterans Affairs, Durham, NC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the emergence of obesity as a global health issue an increasing number of major demographic surveys are collecting measured anthropometric data. Yet little is known about the characteristics and reliability of these data. OBJECTIVES: We evaluate the accuracy and reliability of anthropometric data collected in the home during Wave IV of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), compare our estimates to national standard, clinic-based estimates from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and, using both sources, provide a detailed anthropometric description of young adults in the United States. METHODS: The reliability of Add Health in-home anthropometric measures was estimated from repeat examinations of a random subsample of study participants. A digit preference analysis evaluated the quality of anthropometric data recorded by field interviewers. The adjusted odds of obesity and central obesity in Add Health vs. NHANES were estimated with logistic regression. RESULTS: Short-term reliabilities of in-home measures of height, weight, waist and arm circumference-as well as derived body mass index (BMI, kg/m2)-were excellent. Prevalence of obesity (37% vs. 29%) and central obesity (47% vs. 38%) was higher in Add Health than in NHANES while socio-demographic patterns of obesity and central obesity were comparable in the two studies. CONCLUSIONS: Properly trained non-medical field interviewers can collect reliable anthropometric data in a nationwide, home visit study. This national cohort of young adults in the United States faces a high risk of early-onset chronic disease and premature mortality.
BACKGROUND: With the emergence of obesity as a global health issue an increasing number of major demographic surveys are collecting measured anthropometric data. Yet little is known about the characteristics and reliability of these data. OBJECTIVES: We evaluate the accuracy and reliability of anthropometric data collected in the home during Wave IV of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), compare our estimates to national standard, clinic-based estimates from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and, using both sources, provide a detailed anthropometric description of young adults in the United States. METHODS: The reliability of Add Health in-home anthropometric measures was estimated from repeat examinations of a random subsample of study participants. A digit preference analysis evaluated the quality of anthropometric data recorded by field interviewers. The adjusted odds of obesity and central obesity in Add Health vs. NHANES were estimated with logistic regression. RESULTS: Short-term reliabilities of in-home measures of height, weight, waist and arm circumference-as well as derived body mass index (BMI, kg/m2)-were excellent. Prevalence of obesity (37% vs. 29%) and central obesity (47% vs. 38%) was higher in Add Health than in NHANES while socio-demographic patterns of obesity and central obesity were comparable in the two studies. CONCLUSIONS: Properly trained non-medical field interviewers can collect reliable anthropometric data in a nationwide, home visit study. This national cohort of young adults in the United States faces a high risk of early-onset chronic disease and premature mortality.
Entities:
Keywords:
BMI; Body Mass Index; Epidemiology; Obesity; Quality Assurance; Waist Circumference
Authors: Rik P Bogers; Wanda J E Bemelmans; Rudolf T Hoogenveen; Hendriek C Boshuizen; Mark Woodward; Paul Knekt; Rob M van Dam; Frank B Hu; Tommy L S Visscher; Alessandro Menotti; Roland J Thorpe; Konrad Jamrozik; Susanna Calling; Bjørn Heine Strand; Martin J Shipley Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-09-10
Authors: Quynh C Nguyen; Joyce W Tabor; Pamela P Entzel; Yan Lau; Chirayath Suchindran; Jon M Hussey; Carolyn T Halpern; Kathleen Mullan Harris; Eric A Whitsel Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Quynh C Nguyen; Eric A Whitsel; Joyce W Tabor; Carmen C Cuthbertson; Mark H Wener; Alan J Potter; Carolyn T Halpern; Ley A Killeya-Jones; Jon M Hussey; Chirayath Suchindran; Kathleen Mullan Harris Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2014-10-22 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: P L Canner; N O Borhani; A Oberman; J Cutler; R J Prineas; H Langford; F J Hooper Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1991-08-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Kathleen Mullan Harris; Carolyn Tucker Halpern; Eric A Whitsel; Jon M Hussey; Ley A Killeya-Jones; Joyce Tabor; Sarah C Dean Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Kathleen E Bainbridge; Nelson Roy; Katalin G Losonczy; Howard J Hoffman; Seth M Cohen Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2016-12-23 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Rebecca M Sacks; Erin Takemoto; Sarah Andrea; Nathan F Dieckmann; Katherine W Bauer; Janne Boone-Heinonen Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Lauren Gaydosh; Kristen M Schorpp; Edith Chen; Gregory E Miller; Kathleen Mullan Harris Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-12-18 Impact factor: 11.205