Atilla Icli1, Fatih Aksoy2, Yasin Turker2, Bayram Ali Uysal2, Mehmet Fatih Alpay3, Abdullah Dogan2, Gökay Nar4, Ercan Varol2. 1. Department of Cardiology, Ahi Evran University Faculty of Medicine, Kirsehir, Turkey. Electronic address: atillaicli@hotmail.com. 2. Department of Cardiology, Suleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Medicine, Isparta, Turkey. 3. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ahi Evran University Education and Research Hospital, Kirsehir, Turkey. 4. Department of Cardiology, Ahi Evran University Faculty of Medicine, Kirsehir, Turkey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mean platelet volume (MPV) has been demonstrated to be associated with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, its role in the prediction of pulmonary embolism (PE), which is a major complication of DVT, is still unclear. Therefore, we investigated the association of MPV values with acute PE in patients with DVT. METHOD: The study included three groups: patients with DVT and PE (n=98); patients with DVT without PE (n=97); and control group (No DVT, No PE, n=98). We also evaluated DVT patients according to the MPV values on admission and categorised them into two groups: MPV≤9.15 fL (n=82) and MPV>9.15 fL (n=113). RESULTS: MPV was significantly higher in all DVT patients than controls (9.3±0.9 fL vs 7.9±0.7 fL, p<0.001) and in DVT patients with PE than DVT patients without PE (9.9±0.6 fL vs 8.7±0.7 fL, p<0.001). The rate of PE was higher in patients with DVT with MPV>9.15 fL than those with MVP≤9.15 fL (75.2% vs 15.9%, p<0.001). The presence of PE in patients with DVT was independently associated with MPV (OR: 22.19, 95%CI: 9.39-53.19, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Although our findings should be considered within the limitations of the study, they suggest that MPV measures may be elevated in DVT patients and a higher MPV may be associated with PE in patients with DVT.
BACKGROUND: Mean platelet volume (MPV) has been demonstrated to be associated with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, its role in the prediction of pulmonary embolism (PE), which is a major complication of DVT, is still unclear. Therefore, we investigated the association of MPV values with acute PE in patients with DVT. METHOD: The study included three groups: patients with DVT and PE (n=98); patients with DVT without PE (n=97); and control group (No DVT, No PE, n=98). We also evaluated DVT patients according to the MPV values on admission and categorised them into two groups: MPV≤9.15 fL (n=82) and MPV>9.15 fL (n=113). RESULTS: MPV was significantly higher in all DVT patients than controls (9.3±0.9 fL vs 7.9±0.7 fL, p<0.001) and in DVT patients with PE than DVT patients without PE (9.9±0.6 fL vs 8.7±0.7 fL, p<0.001). The rate of PE was higher in patients with DVT with MPV>9.15 fL than those with MVP≤9.15 fL (75.2% vs 15.9%, p<0.001). The presence of PE in patients with DVT was independently associated with MPV (OR: 22.19, 95%CI: 9.39-53.19, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Although our findings should be considered within the limitations of the study, they suggest that MPV measures may be elevated in DVT patients and a higher MPV may be associated with PE in patients with DVT.