Literature DB >> 26145485

Challenges in Identifying Patients with Type 2 Diabetes for Quality-Improvement Interventions in Primary Care Settings and the Importance of Valid Disease Registries.

Lisa Wozniak1, Allison Soprovich1, Sandra Rees2, Steven T Johnson3, Sumit R Majumdar4, Jeffrey A Johnson5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patient registries are considered an important foundation of chronic disease management, and diabetes patient registries are associated with better processes and outcomes of care. The purpose of this article is to describe the development and use of registries in the Alberta's Caring for Diabetes (ABCD) project to identify and reach target populations for quality-improvement interventions in the primary care setting.
METHODS: We applied the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework and expanded the definition of reach beyond the individual (i.e. patient) level to include the ability to identify target populations at an organizational level. To characterize reach and the implementation of registries, semistructured interviews were conducted with key informants, and a usual-care checklist was compiled for each participating Primary Care Network (PCN). Content analysis was used to analyze qualitative data.
RESULTS: Using registries to identify and recruit participants for the ABCD interventions proved challenging. The quality of the registries depended on whether physicians granted PCN access to patient lists, the strategies used in development, the reliability of diagnostic information and the data elements collected. In addition, once a diabetes registry was developed, there was limited ability to update it.
CONCLUSIONS: Proactive management of chronic diseases like diabetes requires the ability to reach targeted patients at the population level. We observed several challenges to the development and application of patient registries. Given the importance of valid registries, strong collaborations and novel strategies that involve policy-makers, PCNs and providers are needed to help find solutions to improve registry quality and resolve maintenance issues.
Copyright © 2015 Canadian Diabetes Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RE-AIM; diabète de type 2; health program evaluation; panel management; patient registry; prise en charge d’un regroupement de patients; registre de patients; type 2 diabetes; évaluation des programmes sanitaires

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26145485     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2015.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Diabetes        ISSN: 1499-2671            Impact factor:   4.190


  3 in total

1.  Why Is the Electronic Health Record So Challenging for Research and Clinical Care?

Authors:  John H Holmes; James Beinlich; Mary R Boland; Kathryn H Bowles; Yong Chen; Tessa S Cook; George Demiris; Michael Draugelis; Laura Fluharty; Peter E Gabriel; Robert Grundmeier; C William Hanson; Daniel S Herman; Blanca E Himes; Rebecca A Hubbard; Charles E Kahn; Dokyoon Kim; Ross Koppel; Qi Long; Nebojsa Mirkovic; Jeffrey S Morris; Danielle L Mowery; Marylyn D Ritchie; Ryan Urbanowicz; Jason H Moore
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 1.800

2.  A qualitative study examining healthcare managers and providers' perspectives on participating in primary care implementation research.

Authors:  Lisa A Wozniak; Allison Soprovich; Sandra Rees; Steven T Johnson; Sumit R Majumdar; Jeffrey A Johnson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 3.  Working towards a better understanding of type 2 diabetes care organization with First Nations communities: a qualitative assessment.

Authors:  Lisa A Wozniak; Jeffrey A Johnson; Dean T Eurich
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2020-02-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.