Literature DB >> 26143292

Phylogeny of frogs from the genus Physalaemus (Anura, Leptodactylidae) inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences.

Luciana B Lourenço1, Cíntia P Targueta2, Diego Baldo3, Juliana Nascimento2, Paulo C A Garcia4, Gilda V Andrade5, Célio F B Haddad6, Shirlei M Recco-Pimentel2.   

Abstract

Although some species groups have been recognized in the leiuperine genus Physalaemus, no phylogenetic analysis has previously been performed. Here, we provide a phylogenetic study based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences from 41 of the 46 species of Physalaemus. We employed the parsimony criterion using the software TNT and POY and the Bayesian criterion using the software MrBayes. Two major clades were recovered inside the monophyletic Physalaemus: (i) the highly supported Physalaemus signifer Clade, which included P. nattereri and the species previously placed in the P. deimaticus and P. signifer Groups; and (ii) the Physalaemus cuvieri Clade, which included the remaining species of Physalaemus. Five species groups were recognized in the P. cuvieri Clade: the P. biligonigerus Group, the P. cuvieri Group, the P. henselii Group, the P. gracilis Group and the P. olfersii Group. The P. gracilis Species Group was the same as that previously proposed by Nascimento et al. (2005). The P. henselii Group includes P. fernandezae and P. henselii, and was the sister group of a clade that comprised the remaining species of the P. cuvieri Clade. The P. olfersii Group included P. olfersii, P. soaresi, P. maximus, P. feioi and P. lateristriga. The P. biligonigerus Species Group was composed of P. biligonigerus, P. marmoratus, P. santafecinus and P. riograndensis. The P. cuvieri Group inferred here differed from that recognized by Nascimento et al. (2005) only by the inclusion of P. albifrons and the exclusion of P. cicada. The paraphyly of P. cuvieri with respect to P. ephippifer was inferred in all the analyses. Distinct genetic lineages were recognized among individuals currently identified as P. cuvieri and they were congruent with cytogenetic differences reported previously, supporting the hypothesis of occurrence of formally unnamed species.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anura; Phylogeny; Physalaemus; Systematics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26143292     DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  10 in total

1.  Phylogenetic patterns and correlation of key structures for jumping: bone crests and cross-sectional areas of muscles in Leptodactylus (Anura, Leptodactylidae).

Authors:  María Laura Ponssa; Jéssica Fratani; Virginia Abdala
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Sex chromosome evolution in frogs-helpful insights from chromosome painting in the genus Engystomops.

Authors:  Cíntia P Targueta; Vladimir Krylov; Tobias E Nondilo; Jucivaldo Lima; Luciana B Lourenço
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Chromosomal analysis of Physalaemus kroyeri and Physalaemus cicada (Anura, Leptodactylidae).

Authors:  Stenio Eder Vittorazzi; Luciana Bolsoni Lourenço; Mirco Solé; Renato Gomes Faria; Shirlei Maria Recco-Pimentel
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 1.800

4.  Comparative analysis based on replication banding reveals the mechanism responsible for the difference in the karyotype constitution of treefrogs Ololygon and Scinax (Arboranae, Hylidae, Scinaxinae).

Authors:  Simone Lilian Gruber; Gabriela Isabela Gomes de Oliveira; Ana Paula Zampieri Silva; Hideki Narimatsu; Célio Fernando Baptista Haddad; Sanae Kasahara
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.800

5.  Early ontogeny and sequence heterochronies in Leiuperinae frogs (Anura: Leptodactylidae).

Authors:  Jimena Grosso; Diego Baldo; Darío Cardozo; Francisco Kolenc; Claudio Borteiro; Marianna I R de Oliveira; Marcelo F Bonino; Diego A Barrasso; Florencia Vera Candioti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Cytogenetic and genetic data support Crossodactylus aeneus Müller, 1924 as a new junior synonym of C. gaudichaudii Duméril and Bibron, 1841 (Amphibia, Anura).

Authors:  Stenio Eder Vittorazzi; Luciana Bolsoni Lourenço; Michelle Louise Zattera; Luiz Norberto Weber; Shirlei Maria Recco-Pimentel; Daniel Pacheco Bruschi
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 1.771

7.  Advertisement call and genetic structure conservatism: good news for an endangered Neotropical frog.

Authors:  Lucas R Forti; William P Costa; Lucas B Martins; Carlos H L Nunes-de-Almeida; Luís Felipe Toledo
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  First insights on the retroelement Rex1 in the cytogenetics of frogs.

Authors:  Juliana Nascimento; Diego Baldo; Luciana Bolsoni Lourenço
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  A Pan-Amazonian species delimitation: high species diversity within the genus Amazophrynella (Anura: Bufonidae).

Authors:  Rommel R Rojas; Antoine Fouquet; Santiago R Ron; Emil José Hernández-Ruz; Paulo R Melo-Sampaio; Juan C Chaparro; Richard C Vogt; Vinicius Tadeu de Carvalho; Leandra Cardoso Pinheiro; Robson W Avila; Izeni Pires Farias; Marcelo Gordo; Tomas Hrbek
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Does behavioral thermal tolerance predict distribution pattern and habitat use in two sympatric Neotropical frogs?

Authors:  Juan C Díaz-Ricaurte; Filipe C Serrano; Estefany Caroline Guevara-Molina; Cybele Araujo; Marcio Martins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.