Literature DB >> 26142948

Positioning the hip with respect to the COM: Consequences for leg operation.

Reinhard Blickhan1, Emanuel Andrada2, Roy Müller3, Christian Rode3, Naomichi Ogihara4.   

Abstract

In bipedal runners and hoppers the hip is not located at the center of mass in the sagittal projection. This displacement influences operation and energetics of the leg attached to the hip. To investigate this influence in a first step a simple conservative bouncing template is developed in which a heavy trunk is suspended to a massless spring at a pivot point above the center of mass. This model describes the orientation of the ground reaction forces observed in experiments on running birds. In a second step it is assumed that an effective telescope leg with its hip fixed to the trunk remote from the COM generates the same ground reaction forces as those predicted by the template. For this effective leg the influence of hip placement on leg operation and energetics is investigated. Placing the hip directly below, at, or above the pivot point results in high axial energy storage. Posterior placement increases axial losses and hip work whereas anterior placement would require axial work and absorption at the hip. Shifting the hip far posteriorly as observed in some birds can lead to the production of pure extension torques throughout the stance phase. It is proposed that the relative placement of the hip with respect to the center of mass is an important measure to modify effective leg operation with possible implications for balancing the trunk and the control of legged motion systems.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Bouncing; Energy losses; Leg; VPP-SLIP-model

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26142948     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.06.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  8 in total

1.  The rotary component of leg force during walking and running.

Authors:  Manish Anand; Justin Seipel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Force direction patterns promote whole body stability even in hip-flexed walking, but not upper body stability in human upright walking.

Authors:  Roy Müller; Christian Rode; Soran Aminiaghdam; Johanna Vielemeyer; Reinhard Blickhan
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.704

Review 3.  Human and avian running on uneven ground: a model-based comparison.

Authors:  R Müller; A V Birn-Jeffery; Y Blum
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Posture alteration as a measure to accommodate uneven ground in able-bodied gait.

Authors:  Soran Aminiaghdam; Reinhard Blickhan; Roy Muller; Christian Rode
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Limb work and joint work minimization reveal an energetic benefit to the elbows-back, knees-forward limb design in parasagittal quadrupeds.

Authors:  James R Usherwood; Michael C Granatosky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Linking Gait Dynamics to Mechanical Cost of Legged Locomotion.

Authors:  David V Lee; Sarah L Harris
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2018-10-17

7.  Predicting ground reaction forces of human gait using a simple bipedal spring-mass model.

Authors:  Michael Mauersberger; Falk Hähnel; Klaus Wolf; Johannes F C Markmiller; Alexander Knorr; Dominik Krumm; Stephan Odenwald
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.653

8.  Limb, joint and pelvic kinematic control in the quail coping with steps upwards and downwards.

Authors:  Emanuel Andrada; Oliver Mothes; Heiko Stark; Matthew C Tresch; Joachim Denzler; Martin S Fischer; Reinhard Blickhan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.996

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.