Özcan Erdem1, Richard G Prins2, Toon A J J Voorham3, Frank J van Lenthe2, Alex Burdorf2. 1. 1 Municipality of Rotterdam, Department Research and Business Intelligence, Rotterdam, The Netherlands 2 Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Public Health, Rotterdam, The Netherlands o.erdem@rotterdam.nl. 2. 2 Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Public Health, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 3. 3 Municipality of Rotterdam, Department Health Authority, Rotterdam, The Netherlands 4 University of Applied Sciences, Department of Primary Health Care, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neighbourhood inequalities in psychological distress are well reported, but underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. The main purposes of this study were to investigate associations between structural neighbourhood conditions and psychological distress, and to explore the potential mediating role of neighbourhood social cohesion. METHODS: Cross-sectional questionnaire study on a random sample of 18,173 residents aged ≥ 16 years (response 49%) from the four largest cities in the Netherlands. Psychological distress was measured with the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10). Structural environmental factors under study were neighbourhood socio-economic status (SES), neighbourhood green, urbanity and home maintenance. Neighbourhood social cohesion was measured by five statements and aggregated to the neighbourhood level by using ecometrics methodology. Multilevel linear regression analysis was used to investigate associations of neighbourhoods characteristics with psychological distress, adjusted for individual level characteristics. RESULTS: High neighbourhood SES and neighbourhood social cohesion were associated with decreased psychological distress. Adjusted for individual level characteristics and neighbourhood SES, only neighbourhood social cohesion remained significantly associated with psychological distress. Neighbourhood social cohesion accounted for 38% of the differences in the association between neighbourhood SES and psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS: High neighbourhood social cohesion is significantly associated with decreased psychological distress among residents of the four largest cities in the Netherlands. Reducing neighbourhood inequalities in psychological distress may require increasing social interactions among neighbourhood residents.
BACKGROUND: Neighbourhood inequalities in psychological distress are well reported, but underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. The main purposes of this study were to investigate associations between structural neighbourhood conditions and psychological distress, and to explore the potential mediating role of neighbourhood social cohesion. METHODS: Cross-sectional questionnaire study on a random sample of 18,173 residents aged ≥ 16 years (response 49%) from the four largest cities in the Netherlands. Psychological distress was measured with the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10). Structural environmental factors under study were neighbourhood socio-economic status (SES), neighbourhood green, urbanity and home maintenance. Neighbourhood social cohesion was measured by five statements and aggregated to the neighbourhood level by using ecometrics methodology. Multilevel linear regression analysis was used to investigate associations of neighbourhoods characteristics with psychological distress, adjusted for individual level characteristics. RESULTS: High neighbourhood SES and neighbourhood social cohesion were associated with decreased psychological distress. Adjusted for individual level characteristics and neighbourhood SES, only neighbourhood social cohesion remained significantly associated with psychological distress. Neighbourhood social cohesion accounted for 38% of the differences in the association between neighbourhood SES and psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS: High neighbourhood social cohesion is significantly associated with decreased psychological distress among residents of the four largest cities in the Netherlands. Reducing neighbourhood inequalities in psychological distress may require increasing social interactions among neighbourhood residents.
Authors: Nicole D Fields; Brian W Whitcomb; Elizabeth R Bertone-Johnson; Airín D Martínez; Nicole A VanKim Journal: Ethn Health Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 2.732
Authors: Louise Foley; Richard Prins; Fiona Crawford; David Humphreys; Richard Mitchell; Shannon Sahlqvist; Hilary Thomson; David Ogilvie Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Simon Riches; Louise Arseneault; Raha Bagher-Niakan; Manar Alsultan; Eloise Crush; Helen L Fisher Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Sungwoo Lim; Sze Yan Sam Liu; Melanie H Jacobson; Eugenie Poirot; Aldo Crossa; Sean Locke; Jennifer Brite; Elizabeth Hamby; Zinzi Bailey; Stephanie Farquhar Journal: SSM Popul Health Date: 2020-06-04