Literature DB >> 26142376

Are General Practitioners Willing and Able to Provide Genetic Services for Common Diseases?

M A Suchard1, P Yudkin, J S Sinsheimer.   

Abstract

Primary care in the United Kingdom has been advocated as an optimal location for the provision of genetic services for common diseases. Little, however, is known about general practitioners' own views toward this suggestion or the possible demand for such services from patients. To assess general practitioners' attitudes to providing genetic services for common diseases, and to estimate the demand from patients for these services, we used a single-page postal questionnaire survey of all 359 general practitioners registered with the Oxfordshire Health Authority; 339 (94%) responded. These physicians reported that a mean 4.1 patients (95% CI, 3.3-4.9) out of every 1,000 consulting them were concerned about their own risk of a common disease associated with a diagnosis in a family member. Half of the general practitioners (95% CI, 45-56%) counseled about genetics in the last year. A majority of general practitioners accept the need to provide genetic services, but far fewer are competent to do so. Although 60% (95% CI, 55-65%) believed they should be involved with genetic screening for common diseases, only 29% (95% CI, 24-34%) felt sufficiently prepared to take family histories and draw pedigrees, and only 15% (95% CI, 11-19%) felt sufficiently prepared to counsel patients about their genetic test results. Given the necessary training and information, 63% (95% CI, 58-68%) and 64% (95% CI, 59-69%) were willing to provide these services. Even with training and information, not all would be willing to provide these services, and lack of time may be a major deterrent. "Practice-enabling" strategies, such as computerized aids in genetics, may be useful.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 26142376     DOI: 10.1023/A:1022934316284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  20 in total

1.  Genetics in primary care. Report on workshop of EC Concerted Action on Genetics Services in Europe (CAGSE) in association with the Royal College of GP Spring Meeting, Blackpool, UK, 28 April 1995.

Authors:  R Harris; H Harris
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  General practice postal surveys: a questionnaire too far?

Authors:  B R McAvoy; E F Kaner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-21

3.  Response rates in general practice studies.

Authors:  P McDonald
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Genetic testing, common diseases, and health service provision.

Authors:  P S Harper
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Assessment and counseling for women with a family history of breast cancer. A guide for clinicians.

Authors:  K F Hoskins; J E Stopfer; K A Calzone; S D Merajver; T R Rebbeck; J E Garber; B L Weber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Attitudes of general practitioners to presymptomatic testing for Huntington's disease.

Authors:  M E Mennie; S M Holloway; D J Brock
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Attitudes of obstetrician-gynecologists toward DNA testing for a genetic susceptibility to breast cancer.

Authors:  P T Rowley; S Loader
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  The prevalence of a family history of cancer in general practice.

Authors:  N Johnson; T Lancaster; A Fuller; S V Hodgson
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  Genetic epidemiology of breast cancer.

Authors:  W D Thompson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the cancer and steroid hormone study.

Authors:  E B Claus; N Risch; W D Thompson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.