Yoke-Rung Wong1, Chuan Shing Lee2, Austin M K Loke1, Xuan Liu2, Ita Suzana MJ1, Shian Chao Tay3. 1. Biomechanics Laboratory, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. 2. Department of Hand Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. 3. Biomechanics Laboratory, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Department of Hand Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. Electronic address: tay.shian.chao@sgh.com.sg.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the strength of 6-strand Lim-Tsai repair with 4-strand cruciate and Becker repair, which were done using braided polyblend. We hypothesized that the biomechanical strength of 4-strand repair could be as strong as 6-strand repair because of different flexor tendon repair configurations and uneven load bearing. METHODS: We harvested 60 porcine flexor tendons. A transverse cut at the middle of the tendons was made to perform tendon repair. Six-strand Lim-Tsai repair (consisting of 2 Lim-Tsai locking loops), 4-strand cruciate repair (with 3 cross-stitch loops), and 4-strand Becker repair (with 2 double cross-stitch locking loops) were used for the repairs. The repaired tendons were pulled until failure using a mechanical tester. We recorded ultimate tensile strength, load to 2-mm gap force, stiffness, and mechanism of failure. RESULTS: The Becker repairs had significantly greater tensile strength than the cruciate and Lim-Tsai repairs. The load to 2-mm gap force and stiffness were significantly greater for cruciate repairs and Becker repairs than Lim-Tsai repairs. CONCLUSIONS: The biomechanical strength of 4-strand and Becker repairs could be as strong as 6-strand Lim-Tsai repairs. This study implies that the number of strands crossing the repair site of tendons may not be proportional to the biomechanical strength of flexor tendon repair. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Hand surgeons are urged to be aware of the biomechanic characteristics of different flexor tendon repair techniques used in the clinical setting.
PURPOSE: To compare the strength of 6-strand Lim-Tsai repair with 4-strand cruciate and Becker repair, which were done using braided polyblend. We hypothesized that the biomechanical strength of 4-strand repair could be as strong as 6-strand repair because of different flexor tendon repair configurations and uneven load bearing. METHODS: We harvested 60 porcine flexor tendons. A transverse cut at the middle of the tendons was made to perform tendon repair. Six-strand Lim-Tsai repair (consisting of 2 Lim-Tsai locking loops), 4-strand cruciate repair (with 3 cross-stitch loops), and 4-strand Becker repair (with 2 double cross-stitch locking loops) were used for the repairs. The repaired tendons were pulled until failure using a mechanical tester. We recorded ultimate tensile strength, load to 2-mm gap force, stiffness, and mechanism of failure. RESULTS: The Becker repairs had significantly greater tensile strength than the cruciate and Lim-Tsai repairs. The load to 2-mm gap force and stiffness were significantly greater for cruciate repairs and Becker repairs than Lim-Tsai repairs. CONCLUSIONS: The biomechanical strength of 4-strand and Becker repairs could be as strong as 6-strand Lim-Tsai repairs. This study implies that the number of strands crossing the repair site of tendons may not be proportional to the biomechanical strength of flexor tendon repair. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Hand surgeons are urged to be aware of the biomechanic characteristics of different flexor tendon repair techniques used in the clinical setting.