Ryan P Duncan1, Abigail L Leddy2, James T Cavanaugh3, Leland E Dibble4, Terry D Ellis5, Matthew P Ford6, K Bo Foreman4, Gammon M Earhart7. 1. Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, Program in Physical Therapy, St. Louis, MO, United States; Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, Department of Neurology, St. Louis, MO, United States. 2. Rehabilitation Hospital of the Pacific, Department of Physical Therapy, Honolulu, HI, United States. 3. University of New England, Department of Physical Therapy, Portland, ME, United States. 4. University of Utah, Department of Physical Therapy, Salt Lake City, UT, United States. 5. Boston University, Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Boston, MA, United States. 6. Samford University, Department of Physical Therapy, Birmingham, AL, United States. 7. Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, Program in Physical Therapy, St. Louis, MO, United States; Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, Department of Neurology, St. Louis, MO, United States; Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, St. Louis, MO, United States. Electronic address: earhartg@wusm.wustl.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Freezing of gait (FOG) is a relatively common and remarkably disabling impairment associated with Parkinson disease (PD). Laboratory-based measures indicate that individuals with FOG (PD+FOG) have greater balance deficits than those without FOG (PD-FOG). Whether such differences also can be detected using clinical balance tests has not been investigated. We sought to determine if balance and specific aspects of balance, measured using Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), differs between PD+FOG and PD-FOG. Furthermore, we aimed to determine if time-efficient clinical balance measures (i.e. Mini-BESTest, Berg Balance Scale (BBS)) could detect balance differences between PD+FOG and PD-FOG. METHODS: Balance of 78 individuals with PD, grouped as either PD+FOG (n=32) or PD-FOG (n=46), was measured using the BESTest, Mini-BESTest, and BBS. Between-groups comparisons were conducted for these measures and for the six sections of the BESTest using analysis of covariance. A PD composite score was used as a covariate. RESULTS: Controlling for motor sign severity, PD duration, and age, PD+FOG had worse balance than PD-FOG when measured using the BESTest (p=0.008, F=7.35) and Mini-BESTest (p=0.002, F=10.37), but not the BBS (p=0.27, F=1.26). BESTest section differences were noted between PD+FOG and PD-FOG for reactive postural responses (p<0.001, F=14.42) and stability in gait (p=0.003, F=9.18). CONCLUSIONS: The BESTest and Mini-BESTest, which specifically assessed reactive postural responses and stability in gait, were more likely than the BBS to detect differences in balance between PD+FOG and PD-FOG. Because it is more time efficient to administer, the Mini-BESTest may be the preferred tool for assessing balance deficits associated with FOG.
BACKGROUND: Freezing of gait (FOG) is a relatively common and remarkably disabling impairment associated with Parkinson disease (PD). Laboratory-based measures indicate that individuals with FOG (PD+FOG) have greater balance deficits than those without FOG (PD-FOG). Whether such differences also can be detected using clinical balance tests has not been investigated. We sought to determine if balance and specific aspects of balance, measured using Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), differs between PD+FOG and PD-FOG. Furthermore, we aimed to determine if time-efficient clinical balance measures (i.e. Mini-BESTest, Berg Balance Scale (BBS)) could detect balance differences between PD+FOG and PD-FOG. METHODS: Balance of 78 individuals with PD, grouped as either PD+FOG (n=32) or PD-FOG (n=46), was measured using the BESTest, Mini-BESTest, and BBS. Between-groups comparisons were conducted for these measures and for the six sections of the BESTest using analysis of covariance. A PD composite score was used as a covariate. RESULTS: Controlling for motor sign severity, PD duration, and age, PD+FOG had worse balance than PD-FOG when measured using the BESTest (p=0.008, F=7.35) and Mini-BESTest (p=0.002, F=10.37), but not the BBS (p=0.27, F=1.26). BESTest section differences were noted between PD+FOG and PD-FOG for reactive postural responses (p<0.001, F=14.42) and stability in gait (p=0.003, F=9.18). CONCLUSIONS: The BESTest and Mini-BESTest, which specifically assessed reactive postural responses and stability in gait, were more likely than the BBS to detect differences in balance between PD+FOG and PD-FOG. Because it is more time efficient to administer, the Mini-BESTest may be the preferred tool for assessing balance deficits associated with FOG.
Authors: John G Nutt; Bastiaan R Bloem; Nir Giladi; Mark Hallett; Fay B Horak; Alice Nieuwboer Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Nir Giladi; Joseph Tal; Tali Azulay; Oliver Rascol; David J Brooks; Eldad Melamed; Wolfgang Oertel; Werner H Poewe; Fabrizio Stocchi; Eduardo Tolosa Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Mariese A Hely; Wayne G J Reid; Michael A Adena; Glenda M Halliday; John G L Morris Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2008-04-30 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Ellen N Sutter; Katie J Seidler; Ryan P Duncan; Gammon M Earhart; Marie E McNeely Journal: J Rehabil Med Date: 2017-06-28 Impact factor: 2.912
Authors: Jacek Wilczyński; Agnieszka Pedrycz; Dariusz Mucha; Tadeusz Ambroży; Dawid Mucha Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2017-06-27 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Christian Schlenstedt; Martina Mancini; Jay Nutt; Amie P Hiller; Walter Maetzler; Günther Deuschl; Fay Horak Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 5.750
Authors: Esther M J Bekkers; Sam Van Rossom; Elke Heremans; Kim Dockx; Surendar Devan; Sabine M P Verschueren; Alice Nieuwboer Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 4.003