Literature DB >> 26141428

Direct ultrafiltration performance and membrane integrity monitoring by microbiological analysis.

O Ferrer1, S Casas2, C Galvañ2, F Lucena3, A Bosch3, B Galofré4, J Mesa4, J Jofre3, X Bernat2.   

Abstract

The feasibility of substituting a conventional pre-treatment, consisting of dioxi-chlorination, coagulation/flocculation, settling and sand filtration, of a drinking water treatment plant (DWTP) by direct ultrafiltration (UF) has been assessed from a microbiological standpoint. Bacterial indicators, viral indicators and human viruses have been monitored in raw river, ultrafiltered and conventionally pre-treated water samples during two years. Direct UF has proven to remove bacterial indicators quite efficiently and to a greater extent than the conventional process does. Nevertheless, the removal of small viruses such as some small bacteriophages and human viruses (e.g. enteroviruses and noroviruses) is lower than the current conventional pre-treatment. Membrane integrity has been assessed during two years by means of tailored tests based on bacteriophages with different properties (MS-2, GA and PDR-1) and bacterial spores (Bacillus spores). Membrane integrity has not been compromised despite the challenging conditions faced by directly treating raw river water. Bacteriophage PDR-1 appears as a suitable microbe to test membrane integrity, as its size is slightly larger than the considered membrane pore size. However, its implementation at full scale plant is still challenging due to difficulties in obtaining enough phages for its seeding.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteriophages; Enteroviruses; Integrity; Noroviruses; Ultrafiltration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26141428     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.06.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  7 in total

1.  How Fiber Breakage Reduces Microorganism Removal in Ultrafiltration for Wastewater Reclamation.

Authors:  Suntae Lee; Naoyuki Yamashita; Hiroaki Tanaka
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Effect of operation parameters on the flux stabilization of gravity-driven membrane (GDM) filtration system for decentralized water supply.

Authors:  Xiaobin Tang; An Ding; Fangshu Qu; Ruibao Jia; Haiqing Chang; Xiaoxiang Cheng; Bin Liu; Guibai Li; Heng Liang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Evaluation of Virus Reduction by Ultrafiltration with Coagulation-Sedimentation in Water Reclamation.

Authors:  Suntae Lee; Akihiko Hata; Naoyuki Yamashita; Hiroaki Tanaka
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  Recent advances in aqueous virus removal technologies.

Authors:  Hussein E Al-Hazmi; Hanieh Shokrani; Amirhossein Shokrani; Karam Jabbour; Otman Abida; Seyed Soroush Mousavi Khadem; Sajjad Habibzadeh; Shirish H Sonawane; Mohammad Reza Saeb; Adrián Bonilla-Petriciolet; Michael Badawi
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 8.943

5.  Irrigation of Olives with Reclaimed Wastewaters and Deficit Strategies Affect Pathogenic Bacteria Contamination of Water and Soil.

Authors:  Gaetano Alessandro Vivaldi; Salvatore Camposeo; Gabriele Caponio; Giuseppe Lopriore; Francesco Discipio; Francesca Apollonio; Francesco Triggiano; Osvalda De Giglio; Maria Teresa Montagna
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-04-20

6.  Sources, fates and treatment strategies of typical viruses in urban sewage collection/treatment systems: A review.

Authors:  Jianju Li; Jing Liu; Hang Yu; Weixin Zhao; Xinhui Xia; Shijie You; Jun Zhang; Hailong Tong; Liangliang Wei
Journal:  Desalination       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 11.211

Review 7.  Point-of-Care Strategies for Detection of Waterborne Pathogens.

Authors:  Sandeep Kumar; Monika Nehra; Jyotsana Mehta; Neeraj Dilbaghi; Giovanna Marrazza; Ajeet Kaushik
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.