Literature DB >> 26141423

Impact of temperature on feed-flow characteristics and filtration performance of an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket coupled ultrafiltration membrane treating municipal wastewater.

Hale Ozgun1, Yu Tao2, Mustafa Evren Ersahin3, Zhongbo Zhou4, Juan B Gimenez5, Henri Spanjers6, Jules B van Lier6.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the operational feasibility of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR), consisting of an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor coupled to an ultrafiltration membrane unit, at two operational temperatures (25°C and 15°C) for the treatment of municipal wastewater. The results showed that membrane fouling at 15°C was more severe than that at 25°C. Higher chemical oxygen demand (COD) and soluble microbial products (SMP) concentrations, lower mean particle diameter, and higher turbidity in the UASB effluent at lower temperature aggravated membrane fouling compared to the 25°C operation. However, the overall AnMBR treatment performance was not significantly affected by temperature, which was attributed to the physical membrane barrier. Cake resistance was found responsible for over 40% of the total fouling in both cases. However, an increase was observed in the contribution of pore blocking resistance at 15°C related to the larger amount of fine particles in the UASB effluent compared to 25°C. Based on the overall results, it is concluded that an AnMBR, consisting of a UASB coupled membrane unit, is not found technically feasible for the treatment of municipal wastewater at 15°C, considering the rapid deterioration of the filtration performance.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaerobic membrane bioreactor; Membrane fouling; Municipal wastewater; Temperature; Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26141423     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.06.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  6 in total

1.  Membrane fouling and performance of anaerobic ceramic membrane bioreactor treating phenol- and quinoline-containing wastewater: granular activated carbon vs polyaluminum chloride.

Authors:  Shun Wang; Cong Ma; Chao Pang; Zhenhu Hu; Wei Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Dynamics of Archaeal and Bacterial Communities in Response to Variations of Hydraulic Retention Time in an Integrated Anaerobic Fluidized-Bed Membrane Bioreactor Treating Benzothiazole Wastewater.

Authors:  Yue Li; Qi Hu; Da-Wen Gao
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 3.273

3.  Fate of bacterial indicators and Salmonella in biofilm developed on ultrafiltration membranes treating secondary effluents of domestic wastewater.

Authors:  Jeries Jadoun; Raghda Mreny; Ons Saad; Hassan Azaizeh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Control Strategies for a Peristaltically Pumped Low-Pressure Driven Membrane Process.

Authors:  José-Luis Díez; Vicente Masip-Moret; Asunción Santafé-Moros; José M Gozálvez-Zafrilla
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-13

5.  Deep-fried oil consumption in rats impairs glycerolipid metabolism, gut histology and microbiota structure.

Authors:  Zhongkai Zhou; Yuyang Wang; Yumei Jiang; Yongjia Diao; Padraig Strappe; Paul Prenzler; Jamie Ayton; Chris Blanchard
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 6.  Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors for Municipal Wastewater Treatment: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Yerkanat N Kanafin; Dinara Kanafina; Simos Malamis; Evina Katsou; Vassilis J Inglezakis; Stavros G Poulopoulos; Elizabeth Arkhangelsky
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.