Ling Shan1, Ziping Wang2, Lei Guo1, Hongyan Sun2, Tian Qiu1, Yun Ling1, Wenbin Li1, Lin Li1, Xiuyun Liu1, Bo Zheng1, Ning Lu3, Jianming Ying4. 1. Departments of Pathology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. 2. Departments of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. 3. Departments of Pathology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. Electronic address: nlu03@126.com. 4. Departments of Pathology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. Electronic address: jmying@hotmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Tumor heterogeneity, which causes different EGFR mutation abundance, is believed to be responsible for varied progression-free survival (PFS) in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) patients receiving EGFR-TKI treatment. Frequent EGFR amplification and its common affection in EGFR mutant allele promote the hypothesis that EGFR mutant abundance might be determined by EGFR copy number variation and therefore examination of EGFR amplification status in EGFR mutant patients could predict the efficacy of EGFR-TKI treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 86 lung ADC patients, who harbored EGFR activating mutations and received EGFR-TKI treatment, were examined for EGFR amplification and expression by Dual-color Silver in situ Hybridization (DISH) and immunohistochemistry analysis, respectively. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Forty-one of 86 (47.7%) samples with EGFR activating mutations were identified with EGFR amplification. Patients with EGFR gene amplification had a significantly longer PFS than those without (16.3 vs. 9.1 months, p=0.004). The EGFR expression was then examined by immunohistochemistry analysis. Thirty-nine of 86 (45%) tumors had EGFR overexpression, which was significantly correlated with EGFR amplification (p=0.000). However, patients with EGFR overexpression exhibited no difference in PFS (14.1 vs. 13.3 months, p=0.797). In conclusion, EGFR amplification occurs frequently in lung ADC patients harboring EGFR activating mutations, and could serve as an indicator for better response from EGFR-TKI treatment.
OBJECTIVES: Tumor heterogeneity, which causes different EGFR mutation abundance, is believed to be responsible for varied progression-free survival (PFS) in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) patients receiving EGFR-TKI treatment. Frequent EGFR amplification and its common affection in EGFR mutant allele promote the hypothesis that EGFR mutant abundance might be determined by EGFR copy number variation and therefore examination of EGFR amplification status in EGFR mutant patients could predict the efficacy of EGFR-TKI treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 86 lung ADC patients, who harbored EGFR activating mutations and received EGFR-TKI treatment, were examined for EGFR amplification and expression by Dual-color Silver in situ Hybridization (DISH) and immunohistochemistry analysis, respectively. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Forty-one of 86 (47.7%) samples with EGFR activating mutations were identified with EGFR amplification. Patients with EGFR gene amplification had a significantly longer PFS than those without (16.3 vs. 9.1 months, p=0.004). The EGFR expression was then examined by immunohistochemistry analysis. Thirty-nine of 86 (45%) tumors had EGFR overexpression, which was significantly correlated with EGFR amplification (p=0.000). However, patients with EGFR overexpression exhibited no difference in PFS (14.1 vs. 13.3 months, p=0.797). In conclusion, EGFR amplification occurs frequently in lung ADC patients harboring EGFR activating mutations, and could serve as an indicator for better response from EGFR-TKI treatment.
Authors: Atish D Choudhury; Lillian Werner; Edoardo Francini; Xiao X Wei; Gavin Ha; Samuel S Freeman; Justin Rhoades; Sarah C Reed; Gregory Gydush; Denisse Rotem; Christopher Lo; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Lauren C Harshman; Zhenwei Zhang; Edward P O'Connor; Daniel G Stover; Heather A Parsons; Gad Getz; Matthew Meyerson; J Christopher Love; William C Hahn; Viktor A Adalsteinsson Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2018-11-02
Authors: Joshua D Campbell; Anton Alexandrov; Jaegil Kim; Jeremiah Wala; Alice H Berger; Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu; Sachet A Shukla; Guangwu Guo; Angela N Brooks; Bradley A Murray; Marcin Imielinski; Xin Hu; Shiyun Ling; Rehan Akbani; Mara Rosenberg; Carrie Cibulskis; Aruna Ramachandran; Eric A Collisson; David J Kwiatkowski; Michael S Lawrence; John N Weinstein; Roel G W Verhaak; Catherine J Wu; Peter S Hammerman; Andrew D Cherniack; Gad Getz; Maxim N Artyomov; Robert Schreiber; Ramaswamy Govindan; Matthew Meyerson Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Petra Martin; Carolyn J Shiau; Maria Pasic; Ming Tsao; Suzanne Kamel-Reid; Stephanie Lin; Roxana Tudor; Susanna Cheng; Brian Higgins; Ronald Burkes; Matilda Ng; Saroosh Arif; Peter M Ellis; Stacy Hubay; Sara Kuruvilla; Scott A Laurie; Jing Li; David Hwang; Anthea Lau; Frances A Shepherd; Lisa W Le; Natasha B Leighl Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 7.640