Literature DB >> 26140542

Blood flow occlusion pressure at rest and immediately after a bout of low load exercise.

Brian E Barnett1, Scott J Dankel1, Brittany R Counts1, Allison L Nooe1, Takashi Abe1, Jeremy P Loenneke2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether arm circumference is predictive of arterial occlusion in the standing position and to determine the change in pressure before and immediately after exercise. Thirty-one participants had their arm circumference, blood pressure and standing arterial occlusion determined before exercise. Participants then completed elbow flexions at 40% of resting arterial occlusion at 30% of their one repetition maximum (1RM). The goal repetitions for the exercise included one set of 30 repetitions followed by 3 sets of 15, with 30s rest between sets. Immediately following the last set, postexercise arterial occlusion was determined. Two different models of hierarchical linear regression were used to determine the greatest predictor of standing arterial occlusion. Our final model explained 69% of the variance in arterial occlusion with arm circumference (β = 0·639, part = 0·568) explaining more than brachial systolic blood pressure (β = 0·312, part = 0·277). Standing arterial occlusion increased from pre- [138 (15) mmHg] to post- [169 (20) mmHg] exercise (P<0·001). In conclusion, the cardiovascular response to blood flow restriction (BFR) in the upper arm following 4 sets of elbow flexion exercise decreases the relative arterial occlusion pressure. In addition, we confirm previous data that circumference explains the most unique variance in arterial occlusion pressure in the upper body. These findings are important as they provide additional insight into making the pressure more uniform between participants throughout exercise.
© 2015 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990KAATSUzzm321990; blood flow restriction; resistance exercise; vascular occlusion; vascular resistance training

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26140542     DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging        ISSN: 1475-0961            Impact factor:   2.273


  9 in total

1.  Influence of cuff material on blood flow restriction stimulus in the upper body.

Authors:  Samuel L Buckner; Scott J Dankel; Brittany R Counts; Matthew B Jessee; J Grant Mouser; Kevin T Mattocks; Gilberto C Laurentino; Takashi Abe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.781

2.  Limb Occlusion Pressure: A Method to Assess Changes in Systolic Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Zachary W Bell; Matthew B Jessee; Kevin T Mattocks; Samuel L Buckner; Scott J Dankel; J Grant Mouser; Takashi Abe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-02-01

3.  Effects of load on the acute response of muscles proximal and distal to blood flow restriction.

Authors:  Matthew B Jessee; J Grant Mouser; Samuel L Buckner; Scott J Dankel; Kevin T Mattocks; Takashi Abe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.781

4.  Moderately heavy exercise produces lower cardiovascular, RPE, and discomfort compared to lower load exercise with and without blood flow restriction.

Authors:  Zachary W Bell; Samuel L Buckner; Matthew B Jessee; J Grant Mouser; Kevin T Mattocks; Scott J Dankel; Takashi Abe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Muscle fatigue in response to low-load blood flow-restricted elbow-flexion exercise: are there any sex differences?

Authors:  Goncalo V Mendonca; Afonso Borges; Carolina Teodósio; Pedro Matos; Joana Correia; Carolina Vila-Chã; Pedro Mil-Homens; Pedro Pezarat-Correia
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  The Influence of Cuff Width, Sex, and Race on Arterial Occlusion: Implications for Blood Flow Restriction Research.

Authors:  Matthew B Jessee; Samuel L Buckner; Scott J Dankel; Brittany R Counts; Takashi Abe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Contralateral training effects of low-intensity blood-flow restricted and high-intensity unilateral resistance training.

Authors:  Goncalo V Mendonca; Carolina Vila-Chã; Carolina Teodósio; André D Goncalves; Sandro R Freitas; Pedro Mil-Homens; Pedro Pezarat-Correia
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Differences in the limb blood flow between two types of blood flow restriction cuffs: A pilot study.

Authors:  Tom Citherlet; Sarah J Willis; Audrey Chaperon; Grégoire P Millet
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Strengthening the Brain-Is Resistance Training with Blood Flow Restriction an Effective Strategy for Cognitive Improvement?

Authors:  Alexander Törpel; Fabian Herold; Dennis Hamacher; Notger G Müller; Lutz Schega
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.