Literature DB >> 26139006

Evaluation of a dentoalveolar model for testing mouthguards: stress and strain analyses.

Crisnicaw Verissimo1, Paulo Victor Moura Costa1, Paulo César Freitas Santos-Filho1, Alfredo Júlio Fernandes-Neto2, Daranee Tantbirojn3, Antheunis Versluis4, Carlos José Soares1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Custom-fitted mouthguards are devices used to decrease the likelihood of dental trauma. The aim of this study was to develop an experimental bovine dentoalveolar model with periodontal ligament to evaluate mouthguard shock absorption, and impact strain and stress behavior.
METHODS: A pendulum impact device was developed to perform the impact tests with two different impact materials (steel ball and baseball). Five bovine jaws were selected with standard age and dimensions. Six-mm mouthguards were made for the impact tests. The jaws were fixed in a pendulum device and impacts were performed from 90, 60, and 45° angles, with and without mouthguard. Strain gauges were attached at the palatal surface of the impacted tooth. The strain and shock absorption of the mouthguards was calculated and data were analyzed with 3-way anova and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Two-dimensional finite element models were created based on the cross-section of the bovine dentoalveolar model used in the experiment. A nonlinear dynamic impact analysis was performed to evaluate the strain and stress distributions.
RESULTS: Without mouthguards, the increase in impact angulation significantly increased strains and stresses. Mouthguards reduced strain and stress values.
CONCLUSIONS: Impact velocity, impact object (steel ball or baseball), and mouthguard presence affected the impact stresses and strains in a bovine dentoalveolar model. Experimental strain measurements and finite element models predicted similar behavior; therefore, both methodologies are suitable for evaluating the biomechanical performance of mouthguards.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  impact absorption ability; mathematical modeling; mouthguard; strain gauge; stress

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26139006     DOI: 10.1111/edt.12197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Traumatol        ISSN: 1600-4469            Impact factor:   3.333


  3 in total

1.  What are the differences in protective characteristics of orthodontic mouthguards? An in vitro study.

Authors:  Claire Harrington; Gursharan Minhas; Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Martyn T Cobourne
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Functional Anatomy, Impact Behavior and Energy Dissipation of the Peel of Citrus × limon: A Comparison of Citrus × limon and Citrus maxima.

Authors:  Maximilian Jentzsch; Sarah Becker; Marc Thielen; Thomas Speck
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-05

3.  A Comparative Study of Shock Absorption Capacities of Custom Fabricated Mouthguards using a Triangulation Sensor.

Authors:  Rūta Sarac; Julia Helbig; Juliane Dräger; Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.623

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.