Literature DB >> 26138864

Empagliflozin as Add-on Therapy to Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Christopher S Kovacs1, Veeraswamy Seshiah2, Ludwig Merker3, Anita Vedel Christiansen4, Flavien Roux5, Afshin Salsali6, Gabriel Kim6, Peter Stella6, Hans-Juergen Woerle6, Uli C Broedl6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of empagliflozin as add-on therapy to pioglitazone with or without metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
METHODS: Of 498 patients randomized to empagliflozin 10 mg, empagliflozin 25 mg, or placebo once daily for 24 weeks in the EMPA-REG PIO™ study, 305 (61.2%) were treated in a double-blind extension trial for ≥52 weeks (total duration ≥76 weeks). Exploratory end points at week 76 included changes from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), weight, and blood pressure assessed using ANCOVA in patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug and had a baseline HbA1c measurement in the initial study.
FINDINGS: Compared with placebo, adjusted mean (95% CI) changes from baseline in HbA1c level at week 76 were -0.59% (-0.79% to -0.40%; P < 0.001) for empagliflozin 10 mg (-6.5 [-8.6 to -4.4] mmol/mol) and -0.69% (-0.88% to -0.50%; P < 0.001) for empagliflozin 25 mg (-7.5 [-9.6 to -5.4] mmol/mol). Compared with placebo, adjusted mean (95% CI) changes from baseline in weight at week 76 were -2.0 kg (-2.7 to -1.2 kg; P < 0.001) and -1.7 kg (-2.4 -1.0 kg; P < 0.001) for empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg, respectively. Compared with placebo, only empagliflozin 25 mg led to significant reductions in systolic blood pressure (adjusted mean [95% CI] change: -3.7 mmHg [-6.1 to -1.3 mmHg]; P = 0.003) and diastolic blood pressure (adjusted mean [95% CI] change: -2.2 mmHg [-3.7 to -0.7 mmHg]; P = 0.004). Sensitivity analyses were consistent with these results for HbA1c level, fasting plasma glucose concentration, and weight, but revealed no significant difference between empagliflozin and placebo in change from baseline in systolic or diastolic blood pressure at week 76. Confirmed hypoglycemic adverse events (glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L and/or requiring assistance) were reported in 4.2%, 1.8%, and 3.0% of patients treated with placebo, empagliflozin 10 mg, and empagliflozin 25 mg, respectively; 1 patient each taking placebo and empagliflozin 25 mg required assistance. Adverse events consistent with urinary tract infection were reported in 26.7%, 22.4%, and 22.0% of patients treated with placebo, empagliflozin 10 mg, and empagliflozin 25 mg, respectively. Adverse events consistent with genital infection were reported in 3.0%, 10.3%, and 4.2% of patients treated with placebo, empagliflozin 10 mg, and empagliflozin 25 mg, respectively. IMPLICATIONS: Empagliflozin 10 mg or 25 mg as add-on therapy to pioglitazone with or without metformin for 76 weeks was well tolerated and led to sustained reductions in HbA1c and weight compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01210001.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SGLT2; empagliflozin; glycemic control; metformin; pioglitazone; type 2 diabetes mellitus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26138864     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.05.511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  35 in total

Review 1.  Diabetes pharmacotherapy and effects on the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  Evangelia Kalaitzoglou; John L Fowlkes; Iuliana Popescu; Kathryn M Thrailkill
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 4.876

Review 2.  Empagliflozin: A Review in Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  James E Frampton
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  The impact of SGLT2 inhibitors, compared with insulin, on diabetic bone disease in a mouse model of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Kathryn M Thrailkill; Jeffry S Nyman; R Clay Bunn; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Katherine L Thompson; Charles K Lumpkin; Evangelia Kalaitzoglou; John L Fowlkes
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and cardiovascular outcomes: insights from the CVD-REAL study.

Authors:  Marwan Saad
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-02

Review 5.  Short-Term Treatment with Empagliflozin Resulted in Dehydration and Cardiac Arrest in an Elderly Patient with Specific Complications: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Sopak Supakul; Yurika Nishikawa; Masanori Teramura; Tetsuro Takase
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 2.948

Review 6.  Pharmacology and therapeutic implications of current drugs for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Abd A Tahrani; Anthony H Barnett; Clifford J Bailey
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 43.330

7.  Comparative effectiveness and safety of empagliflozin on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Wilbert S Aronow; Tatyana A Shamliyan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-12

8.  Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and cardiac arrhythmias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hang-Long Li; Gregory-Y H Lip; Qi Feng; Yue Fei; Yi-Kei Tse; Mei-Zhen Wu; Qing-Wen Ren; Hung-Fat Tse; Bernard-M Y Cheung; Kai-Hang Yiu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 9.951

Review 9.  Clinical Care Pathway for the Risk Stratification and Management of Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Authors:  Fasiha Kanwal; Jay H Shubrook; Leon A Adams; Kim Pfotenhauer; Vincent Wai-Sun Wong; Eugene Wright; Manal F Abdelmalek; Stephen A Harrison; Rohit Loomba; Christos S Mantzoros; Elisabetta Bugianesi; Robert H Eckel; Lee M Kaplan; Hashem B El-Serag; Kenneth Cusi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 33.883

Review 10.  Benefits and Harms of Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Heidi Storgaard; Lise L Gluud; Cathy Bennett; Magnus F Grøndahl; Mikkel B Christensen; Filip K Knop; Tina Vilsbøll
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.