Juliana Silva Esteves1,2, Renato Augusto Moreira de Sá2,3, Paulo Roberto Nassar de Carvalho2,4, Luis Guillermo Coca Velarde3. 1. a Hospital Federal Servidores do Estado, Departament of Obstetricia, Maternal-fetal Unit, Ministério da Saúde - Rio de Janeiro , Brazil . 2. b Clínica Perinatal Barra , Rio de Janeiro , RJ , Brazil . 3. c Universidade Federal Fluminense , Niterói , RJ , Brazil , and. 4. d Department of Obstetrics , Instituto Fernandes Figueira/FIOCRUZ , Rio de Janeiro , RJ , Brazil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify adverse neonatal outcomes and identifies the predictors of adverse neonatal outcomes in premature rupture of membranes before 26 weeks. METHODS: Data were collected between January 2005 and December 2011 from all pregnant women who presented preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) between 18 and 26 complete weeks of gestation and were admitted to one of three Brazilian institutes. The adverse outcomes included mortality or the development of a severe morbidity during the length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The descriptive statistics of the population were reported. A multiple logistic regression was performed for each predictor of neonatal adverse outcomes. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curves for the birth weight was calculated. RESULTS: Composite adverse outcomes during the NICU stay occurred in 82.1% (n = 23) of the cases and included 33 (54%) neonatal deaths, 19 (67.8%) cases of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), 13 (46.4%) cases of pulmonary hypoplasia (BPD), 8 (28.5%) cases of periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage (PIH) and 3 (10.7%) cases of periventricular leukomalacia (PVL). Only 17.8% (n = 5) of the neonates survived without morbidity. The area under the curve for the birth weight was 0.90 (95% IC: 0.81-0.98) for the prediction of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: PPROM before 26 weeks has a high morbidity and mortality, and the significant predictors of neonatal mortality and adverse outcomes were antibiotic prophylaxis, latency period, GA at birth and birth weight. Nevertheless, the only independent significant predictor of survival rate was birth weight.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify adverse neonatal outcomes and identifies the predictors of adverse neonatal outcomes in premature rupture of membranes before 26 weeks. METHODS: Data were collected between January 2005 and December 2011 from all pregnant women who presented preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) between 18 and 26 complete weeks of gestation and were admitted to one of three Brazilian institutes. The adverse outcomes included mortality or the development of a severe morbidity during the length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The descriptive statistics of the population were reported. A multiple logistic regression was performed for each predictor of neonatal adverse outcomes. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curves for the birth weight was calculated. RESULTS: Composite adverse outcomes during the NICU stay occurred in 82.1% (n = 23) of the cases and included 33 (54%) neonatal deaths, 19 (67.8%) cases of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), 13 (46.4%) cases of pulmonary hypoplasia (BPD), 8 (28.5%) cases of periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage (PIH) and 3 (10.7%) cases of periventricular leukomalacia (PVL). Only 17.8% (n = 5) of the neonates survived without morbidity. The area under the curve for the birth weight was 0.90 (95% IC: 0.81-0.98) for the prediction of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: PPROM before 26 weeks has a high morbidity and mortality, and the significant predictors of neonatal mortality and adverse outcomes were antibiotic prophylaxis, latency period, GA at birth and birth weight. Nevertheless, the only independent significant predictor of survival rate was birth weight.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adverse neonatal outcomes; pre-viable rupture of membranes; predictors; single pregnancy
Authors: Erbil Çakar; Şule Eren Çakar; Habibe Ayvacı Taşan; Deniz Karçaaltıncaba; Mehmet Baki Şentürk; Nermin Koç; Ramazan Uluhan Journal: Balkan Med J Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 2.021