Aurélien Amiot1, Anne Hulin2, Mehdi Belhassan3, Chantal Andre4, Charlotte Gagniere3, Yann Le Baleur3, Jean-Pierre Farcet4, Jean-Charles Delchier3, Sophie Hüe4. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Henri-Mondor Hospital, DHU VIC, AP-HP, 94000 Créteil, France; University of Paris Est Creteil, 94000 Créteil, France; LIC, Laboratoire d'Investigation Clinique EA 4393, 94000 Créteil, France. Electronic address: aurelien.amiot@hmn.aphp.fr. 2. University of Paris Est Creteil, 94000 Créteil, France; Laboratory of Pharmacology-Toxicology, Henri-Mondor Hospital, DHU VIC, AP-HP, 94000 Créteil, France; Laboratory of Biological Immunology, Henri-Mondor Hospital, DHU VIC, AP-HP, 94000 Créteil, France. 3. Department of Gastroenterology, Henri-Mondor Hospital, DHU VIC, AP-HP, 94000 Créteil, France; University of Paris Est Creteil, 94000 Créteil, France. 4. University of Paris Est Creteil, 94000 Créteil, France; Laboratory of Biological Immunology, Henri-Mondor Hospital, DHU VIC, AP-HP, 94000 Créteil, France; INSERM, Unit U-955, IMRB, 94000 Créteil, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is no evidence that therapeutic drug monitoring is helpful in patients with inflammatory bowel disease patients in clinical remission with infliximab therapy. METHODS: Eighty consecutive inflammatory bowel disease patients in clinical remission on infliximab maintenance therapy were included and followed-up for at least one year. Infliximab trough level and antibody to infliximab concentration were measured prior to enrollment. At the time of enrollment, physicians in charge were free to alleviate infliximab therapy. Discrepancies between blind and therapeutic drug monitoring-based adjustments were assessed at the end of the follow-up period. Relapse-free survival was analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The mean infliximab trough level was 3.1 μg/mL. Antibody to infliximab was found in 15 (19%) patients. At the end of the follow-up period, 18 (22.5%) patients experienced a relapse. The 3, 6, 9 and 12-month relapse-free rates were 98%, 87%, 86% and 80%, respectively. In our multivariate analysis, relapse-free survival was negatively associated with discrepancies between therapeutic drug monitoring-based and blind adjustments of infliximab therapy, absence of concomitant immunomodulator, the absence of mucosal healing, prior use of infliximab, infliximab therapy duration>2 years and C-reactive protein levels>5mg/L at the time of enrollment. CONCLUSION: In patients with inflammatory bowel disease in clinical remission on infliximab therapy, de-escalation of infliximab therapy should be considered based on therapeutic drug monitoring rather than according to symptoms and CRP.
BACKGROUND: There is no evidence that therapeutic drug monitoring is helpful in patients with inflammatory bowel diseasepatients in clinical remission with infliximab therapy. METHODS: Eighty consecutive inflammatory bowel diseasepatients in clinical remission on infliximab maintenance therapy were included and followed-up for at least one year. Infliximab trough level and antibody to infliximab concentration were measured prior to enrollment. At the time of enrollment, physicians in charge were free to alleviate infliximab therapy. Discrepancies between blind and therapeutic drug monitoring-based adjustments were assessed at the end of the follow-up period. Relapse-free survival was analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The mean infliximab trough level was 3.1 μg/mL. Antibody to infliximab was found in 15 (19%) patients. At the end of the follow-up period, 18 (22.5%) patients experienced a relapse. The 3, 6, 9 and 12-month relapse-free rates were 98%, 87%, 86% and 80%, respectively. In our multivariate analysis, relapse-free survival was negatively associated with discrepancies between therapeutic drug monitoring-based and blind adjustments of infliximab therapy, absence of concomitant immunomodulator, the absence of mucosal healing, prior use of infliximab, infliximab therapy duration>2 years and C-reactive protein levels>5mg/L at the time of enrollment. CONCLUSION: In patients with inflammatory bowel disease in clinical remission on infliximab therapy, de-escalation of infliximab therapy should be considered based on therapeutic drug monitoring rather than according to symptoms and CRP.
Authors: Konstantinos Papamichael; Adam S Cheifetz; Gil Y Melmed; Peter M Irving; Niels Vande Casteele; Patricia L Kozuch; Laura E Raffals; Leonard Baidoo; Brian Bressler; Shane M Devlin; Jennifer Jones; Gilaad G Kaplan; Miles P Sparrow; Fernando S Velayos; Thomas Ullman; Corey A Siegel Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2019-03-27 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Lívia Moreira Genaro; Luís Eduardo Miani Gomes; Ana Paula Menezes de Freitas Franceschini; Hugo Dugolin Ceccato; Rafael Nascimento de Jesus; Amanda Pereira Lima; Cristiane Kibune Nagasako; João José Fagundes; Maria de Lourdes Setsuko Ayrizono; Raquel Franco Leal Journal: Am J Transl Res Date: 2021-12-15 Impact factor: 4.060
Authors: Mohammad F Rabbi; Nour Eissa; Peris M Munyaka; Laëtitia Kermarrec; Omar Elgazzar; Ehsan Khafipour; Charles N Bernstein; Jean Eric Ghia Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2017-08-21 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Vito Annese; Rahul Nathwani; Maryam Alkhatry; Ahmad Al-Rifai; Sameer Al Awadhi; Filippos Georgopoulos; Ahmad N Jazzar; Ahmed M Khassouan; Zaher Koutoubi; Mazen S Taha; Jimmy K Limdi Journal: Therap Adv Gastroenterol Date: 2021-12-22 Impact factor: 4.409
Authors: Ray K Boyapati; Joana Torres; Carolina Palmela; Claire E Parker; Orli M Silverberg; Sonam D Upadhyaya; Tran M Nguyen; Jean-Frédéric Colombel Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-05-12