Literature DB >> 26137648

["A change in medical thinking?" or "over-eager literary activity?" August Bier, homeopathy and the Nobel Prize 1906-1936].

Nils Hansson.   

Abstract

This essay explains the nomination and evaluation procedure for the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine. Its research is based on original files and on the example of August Karl Gustav Bier (1861-1949). It discusses the minutes of the Nobel Committee for physiology or medicine, which are kept in the Nobel Archives, as well as the unusually high number of nominations of August Bier and the nominations submitted by him; it also describes the reasons why August Bier, in the end, never received the Nobel Prize. The essay focuses mainly on the reception of Bier's homeopathic theses by the Nobel Prize Committee and his nominators.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26137648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Ges Gesch        ISSN: 0939-351X


  3 in total

1.  [The 69th Congress-urologists nominated for the Nobel Prize : Not everyone got a prize: four biographical sketches].

Authors:  F H Moll; T Halling; M Krischel; N Hansson; H Fangerau
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Nominee and nominator, but never Nobel Laureate: Vincenz Czerny and the Nobel Prize.

Authors:  Nils Hansson; Annette Tuffs
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  ["Why visit a medical congress?" : Knowledge transfer between Germany and Sweden using the example of the 1929 DGU meeting in Munich].

Authors:  N Hansson; B Uvelius; T Halling; F H Moll
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 0.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.