| Literature DB >> 26136731 |
Margaux Meslé1, Gilles Dromart2, Frank Haeseler3, Philippe M Oger1.
Abstract
Organic-rich shales are populated by methanogenic consortia that are able to degrade the fossilized organic matter into methane gas. To identify the organic fraction effectively degraded, we have sequentially depleted two types of organic-rich sedimentary rocks, shale, and coal, at two different maturities, by successive solvent extractions to remove the most soluble fractions (maltenes and asphaltenes) and isolate kerogen. We show the ability of the consortia to produce methane from all rock samples, including those containing the most refractory organic matter, i.e., the kerogen. Shales yielded higher methane production than lignite and coal. Mature rocks yielded more methane than immature rocks. Surprisingly, the efficiency of the consortia was not influenced by the removal of the easily biodegradable fractions contained in the maltenes and asphaltenes. This suggests that one of the limitations of organic matter degradation in situ may be the accessibility to the carbon and energy source. Indeed, bitumen has a colloidal structure that may prevent the microbial consortia from reaching the asphaltenes in the bulk rock. Solvent extractions might favor the access to asphaltenes and kerogen by modifying the spatial organization of the molecules in the rock matrix.Entities:
Keywords: asphaltenes; kerogen; maltenes; methanogenic consortia; organic matter
Year: 2015 PMID: 26136731 PMCID: PMC4468910 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00589
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Main geochemical parameters obtained by Rock-Eval 6 pyrolysis on the four bulk rocks (A) and their residues after solvent extractions, (B) Residue 1: after n-C5 extraction, (C) Residue 2: after n-C5 and dichloromethane (DCM) extraction, (D) Quantifications of the soluble fractions extracted from the bulk rocks (BRs).
| (A) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immature shale | 6.76 | 42.03 | 418 | 7.98 | 575 | 25 | 3.19 |
| Mature shale | 32.17 | 7.52 | 440 | 2.11 | 366 | 20 | 0.49 |
| Lignite | 0.87 | 40.84 | 431 | 46.60 | 104 | 80 | 3.99 |
| Coal | 2.87 | 72.78 | 439 | 43.85 | 167 | 4 | 1.02 |
| Immature shale | 2.10 | 37.89 | 415 | 9.54 | 398 | 25 | |
| Mature shale | 5.28 | 5.04 | 438 | 2.75 | 184 | 31 | |
| Lignite | 0.84 | 33.05 | 429 | 38.12 | 87 | 79 | |
| Coal | 3.39 | 52.87 | 435 | 31.46 | 168 | 8 | |
| Immature shale | 0.75 | 35.22 | 414 | 9.37 | 376 | 27 | |
| Mature shale | 3.06 | 5.11 | 438 | 2.615 | 195 | 40 | |
| Lignite | 0.74 | 33.91 | 432 | 38.73 | 88 | 78 | |
| Coal | 1.62 | 47.60 | 436 | 31.278 | 152 | 7 | |
| Immature shale | 9.10 | 38.28 | |||||
| Mature shale | 28.96 | 30.12 | |||||
| Lignite | 0.31 | 4.50 | |||||
| Coal | 0.58 | 6.29 | |||||
Bacterial diversity at the phylum level in the microcosms prepared from the immature shale (7 m depth).
| Organic substrates | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTU | Sterilized BR | BR | R1 | R2 | Acetate (control) | Inoculum | ||
| Bacteroidetes | 45 | 4.18 | 15.46 | 19.02 | 15.19 | 48.31 | 55.32 | |
| Firmicutes | 204 | 3.76 | 52.46 | 47.6 | 42.33 | 41.53 | 36.35 | |
| Proteobacteria | 138 | 92.06 | 32.09 | 33.38 | 42.48 | 10.17 | 8.33 | |
| Chao | 985 | 943 | 1048 | 1842 | 964 | 131 | ||
| Shannon | 2.81 | 3.99 | 4.41 | 4.30 | 4.29 | 2.33 | ||
Proportion of the 10 most abundant and best-shared OTUs from the microcosms prepared with the immature shale-derived substrates.
| Organic substrates | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phylum | Genus | OTU # | Sterilized BR | BR | R1 | R2 | Acetate (control) | Inoculum |
| Bacteroidetes | 1563 | 0.49 | 3.74 | 3.14 | 3.17 | 14.62 | 16.61 | |
| 1568 | 2.65 | 7.01 | 8.31 | 7.71 | 20.97 | 37.67 | ||
| Firmicutes | Unidentified Eubacteriaceae | 24 | 0.63 | 10.49 | 11.5 | 9.07 | – | – |
| Unidentified Eubacteriaceae | 1550 | 1.39 | 14.74 | 9.88 | 12.02 | – | – | |
| 1604 | – | 0.26 | 0.09 | – | 1.06 | 13.58 | ||
| Unidentified Eubacteriaceae | 1610 | 1.05 | 14.12 | 8.77 | 10.05 | – | – | |
| 1629 | – | 0.31 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 3.39 | 7.57 | ||
| Proteobacteria | 5 | 18.12 | 1.13 | 1.94 | 1.97 | 2.12 | – | |
| 1556 | 57.77 | 8.65 | 6.93 | 7.71 | 7.63 | 8.19 | ||
| 1559 | 0.84 | 5.94 | 5.17 | 6.5 | – | – | ||
Proportion of the 10 most abundant OTUs for each sample.
| Organic substrates | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57.77 | 14.74 | Unidentified Eubacteriaceae | 11.50 | Unidentified Eubacteriaceae | 12.02 | Unidentified Eubacteriaceae | 20.97 | 37.67 | |||
| 18.12 | 14.12 | Unidentified Eubacteriaceae | 9.88 | Unidentified Eubacteriaceae | 10.05 | Unidentified Eubacteriaceae | 14.62 | 16.61 | |||
| 3.00 | 10.49 | Unidentified Eubacteriaceae | 8.77 | Unidentified Eubacteriaceae | 9.07 | Unidentified Eubacteriaceae | 7.63 | 13.58 | |||
| 2.65 | 8.65 | 8.31 | 7.71 | 5.93 | 8.19 | ||||||
| 1.39 | Unidentified Eubacteriaceae | 7.01 | 6.93 | 7.71 | 4.87 | 7.57 | |||||
| 1.05 | Unidentified Eubacteriaceae | 5.94 | 5.17 | 6.50 | 3.39 | 4.87 | |||||
| 0.91 | 3.74 | 3.14 | 4.76 | Unidentified Alcaligenaceae | 2.54 | 1.14 | |||||
| 0.84 | 3.02 | 2.91 | 3.78 | 2.33 | 1.09 | other Clostridiales | |||||
| 0.77 | 3.02 | 1.99 | 3.17 | 2.12 | 1.04 | ||||||
| 0.70 | 1.74 | Unidentified Alcaligenaceae | 1.94 | 2.57 | Unidentified Alcaligenaceae | 2.12 | 0.76 | ||||
| 87.18 | 72.47 | 60.53 | 67.35 | 66.53 | 92.52 | ||||||
Taxonomic affiliation of the OTUs defined for the different substrates prepared from the immature shale sample, and for the acetate-grown consortia (control and inoculum).
| Organic substrates | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phylum | Class | Genus | Sterilized BR | BR | R1 | R2 | Acetate (control) | Inoculum | ||||||
| OTU | % | OTU | % | OTU | % | OTU | % | OTU | % | OTU | % | |||
| Bacteroidetes | 7 | 20 | 28 | 12 | 11 | 6 | ||||||||
| Firmicutes | 0 | – | 3 | 2 | 0 | – | 3 | 2 | ||||||
| 0 | – | 0 | – | 2 | 1 | 17 | 1 | |||||||
| 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | 0 | – | 0 | – | 2 | |||||
| 0 | – | 2 | 2 | 0 | – | 2 | 2 | |||||||
| 0 | – | 10 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | ||||||||
| 0 | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | ||||||||
| 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Unidentified Eubacteriaceae | 4 | 43 | 45 | 21 | 0 | – | 0 | – | ||||||
| Unidentified Gracilibacteraceae | 3 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 0 | – | 1 | |||||||
| Other Clostridiales | 0 | – | 2 | 3 | 0 | – | 0 | – | 5 | |||||
| Unclassified Firmicutes | 0 | – | 1 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 6 | |||||||
| Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Unidentified Alcaligenaceae | 2 | 5 | 7 | 14 | 0 | – | 0 | – | ||||
| Other Betaproteobacteria | 1 | 0 | – | 1 | 2 | 0 | – | 0 | – | |||||
| Deltaproteobacteria | 46 | 9 | 14 | 8 | 3 | 1 | ||||||||
| Gammaproteobacteria | 4 | 20 | 24 | 14 | 0 | – | 0 | – | ||||||
| Other Proteobacteria | 0 | – | 3 | 1 | 5 | 0 | – | 1 | ||||||