G J Melendez-Torres1, Ford Hickson2, David Reid2, Peter Weatherburn2, Chris Bonell3. 1. Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 2. Sigma Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London, UK. 3. Social Science Research Unit, Department of Childhood, Families and Health, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This nested cross-sectional study of dyadic sexual encounters with new male partners reported by men living in England who have sex with men tested moderation between drug use and location of sex in associations with unprotected anal intercourse (UAI). METHODS: Data were drawn from two waves of a longitudinal monthly internet survey of men living in England who have sex with men conducted in 2011. Using generalised estimating equations and logit link, we tested the relationship with UAI of any respondent drug use before sex, specific respondent drug use before sex, location of sex (distinguishing private, sex-on-premises venue and cruising locations) and location-drug use interactions. RESULTS: Any respondent drug use (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.88) was associated with increased odds of UAI. Relative to encounters in private locations, encounters in sex-on-premises venues (0.69, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.91), but not cruising locations, were associated with decreased odds of UAI. Any respondent drug use, respondent use of poppers and respondent use of alcohol were each associated with increased UAI in sex-on-premises venues. DISCUSSION: This analysis presents evidence of moderation between drug use and location of sex in associations with UAI. Though this analysis used a large sample, it relied on community-recruited respondents. Our findings may reflect either 'totalising' effects of drug use across venues or site-specific use of drugs as a mechanism for cognitive escape. Additional qualitative research is necessary to understand these findings in context. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
OBJECTIVES: This nested cross-sectional study of dyadic sexual encounters with new male partners reported by men living in England who have sex with men tested moderation between drug use and location of sex in associations with unprotected anal intercourse (UAI). METHODS: Data were drawn from two waves of a longitudinal monthly internet survey of men living in England who have sex with men conducted in 2011. Using generalised estimating equations and logit link, we tested the relationship with UAI of any respondent drug use before sex, specific respondent drug use before sex, location of sex (distinguishing private, sex-on-premises venue and cruising locations) and location-drug use interactions. RESULTS: Any respondent drug use (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.88) was associated with increased odds of UAI. Relative to encounters in private locations, encounters in sex-on-premises venues (0.69, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.91), but not cruising locations, were associated with decreased odds of UAI. Any respondent drug use, respondent use of poppers and respondent use of alcohol were each associated with increased UAI in sex-on-premises venues. DISCUSSION: This analysis presents evidence of moderation between drug use and location of sex in associations with UAI. Though this analysis used a large sample, it relied on community-recruited respondents. Our findings may reflect either 'totalising' effects of drug use across venues or site-specific use of drugs as a mechanism for cognitive escape. Additional qualitative research is necessary to understand these findings in context. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Entities:
Keywords:
COMMERCIAL SEX; DRUG MISUSE; GAY MEN; SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR
Authors: Sean P Colyer; Nathan J Lachowsky; Zishan Cui; Julia Zhu; Heather L Armstrong; Matthew Taylor; Joshua Edward; Gbolahan Olarewaju; Robert S Hogg; Eric A Roth; David M Moore Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Sean P Colyer; David M Moore; Zishan Cui; Julia Zhu; Heather L Armstrong; Matthew Taylor; Joshua Edward; Terry Howard; Chad Dickie; Gbolahan Olarewaju; Julio S G Montaner; Robert S Hogg; Eric A Roth; Nathan J Lachowsky Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Nick Meader; Kristelle King; Thirimon Moe-Byrne; Kath Wright; Hilary Graham; Mark Petticrew; Chris Power; Martin White; Amanda J Sowden Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 3.295