Aine Butler1, Damien Gallagher1, Paddy Gillespie2, Lisa Crosby1, Deirdre Ryan1, Loretto Lacey3, Robert Coen1, Eamon O'Shea4, Brian Lawlor1. 1. St James's Hospital, Mercer's Institute for Research on Ageing, Dublin, Ireland. 2. School of Business and Economics, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland. 3. Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy, Dublin, Ireland. 4. Irish Centre for Social Gerontology, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Dementia draws on a variety of public and private resources. There is increasing pressure to define the cost components in this area to improve resource allocation and accountability. The aim of this study was to characterize frailty in a group of cognitively impaired community-dwelling elders and evaluate its relationship with cost and resource utilization. METHODS: We assessed a cross-sectional, convenient sample of 115 cognitively impaired patients of age >55 years who attended the National Memory Clinic in St James' University Hospital, a Trinity College-affiliated hospital in Dublin, Ireland. Participants had a clinical diagnosis of possible Alzheimer's disease or mild cognitive impairment. Frailty was measured using the biological syndrome model. Formal health and social care costs and daily informal caregiving costs were collected and the total costs of care estimated by applying the appropriate unit cost estimate for each resource activity. Stepwise regression models were constructed to establish the factors associated with increased care costs. RESULTS: Patient dependence, frailty and number of co-morbid illnesses explained 43.3% of the variance in observed daily informal care costs in dementia and cognitively impaired patients. Dependence was the sole factor retained in an optimal model explaining 19% of the variance in formal health and social care costs. CONCLUSION: Frailty retained a strong association with daily informal care costs even in the context of other known risk factors for increasing care costs. Interventions that reduce frailty as well as patient dependence on others may be associated with cost savings.
OBJECTIVES:Dementia draws on a variety of public and private resources. There is increasing pressure to define the cost components in this area to improve resource allocation and accountability. The aim of this study was to characterize frailty in a group of cognitively impaired community-dwelling elders and evaluate its relationship with cost and resource utilization. METHODS: We assessed a cross-sectional, convenient sample of 115 cognitively impairedpatients of age >55 years who attended the National Memory Clinic in St James' University Hospital, a Trinity College-affiliated hospital in Dublin, Ireland. Participants had a clinical diagnosis of possible Alzheimer's disease or mild cognitive impairment. Frailty was measured using the biological syndrome model. Formal health and social care costs and daily informal caregiving costs were collected and the total costs of care estimated by applying the appropriate unit cost estimate for each resource activity. Stepwise regression models were constructed to establish the factors associated with increased care costs. RESULTS:Patient dependence, frailty and number of co-morbid illnesses explained 43.3% of the variance in observed daily informal care costs in dementia and cognitively impairedpatients. Dependence was the sole factor retained in an optimal model explaining 19% of the variance in formal health and social care costs. CONCLUSION: Frailty retained a strong association with daily informal care costs even in the context of other known risk factors for increasing care costs. Interventions that reduce frailty as well as patient dependence on others may be associated with cost savings.
Authors: Kristine E Ensrud; Allyson M Kats; John T Schousboe; Brent C Taylor; Peggy M Cawthon; Teresa A Hillier; Kristine Yaffe; Steve R Cummings; Jane A Cauley; Lisa Langsetmo Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Lauren E Griffith; Parminder Raina; David Kanters; David Hogan; Christopher Patterson; Alexandra Papaioannou; Julie Richardson; Anne Gilsing; Mary Thompson; Edwin van den Heuvel Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Jens-Oliver Bock; Hans-Helmut König; Hermann Brenner; Walter E Haefeli; Renate Quinzler; Herbert Matschinger; Kai-Uwe Saum; Ben Schöttker; Dirk Heider Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-04-14 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Marjolein van der Vlegel; Juanita A Haagsma; A J L M Geraerds; Leonie de Munter; Mariska A C de Jongh; Suzanne Polinder Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 3.921