Oliver Thews1, Peter Vaupel2. 1. Institute of Physiology, University of Halle, Magdeburger Str. 6, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany. oliver.thews@medizin.uni-halle.de. 2. Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Tumor Pathophysiology Section, University Medical Center, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inspiratory hyperoxia reduces tumor hypoxia, which is responsible for limited radiosensitivity of tumors. However, very little is known about the heterogeneity of intratumoral oxygenation during this supportive treatment. The study analyzes whether local hypoxia is still present during normobaric and hyperbaric inspiratory hyperoxia and whether the addition of CO2 to the inspiratory gas affects the spatial pO2 distribution. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Tumor oxygenation of experimental DS-sarcomas in rats was assessed by polarographic needle electrodes at 1 and 2 atm (bar) environmental pressure during pure O2 or carbogen (95 % O2 + 5 % CO2) breathing. Up to 320 individual pO2 measurements were performed in a strictly oriented grid resulting in an oxygenation profile in a horizontal tumor layer. RESULTS: In the experimental tumors used the oxygenation showed pronounced heterogeneities with closely adjacent hypoxic and oxygenated regions. This heterogeneity was still visible under normobaric hyperoxia where large confluent hypoxic regions were detectable. At 1 atm, the addition of CO2 improved tumor oxygenation significantly (at least in large tumors). At 2 atm, only very small local regions of hypoxia were detected. However, under this condition hypercapnia had no impact on tumor oxygenation. CONCLUSIONS: The data show that even under hyperbaric hyperoxia, hypoxic regions are detectable despite the average pO2 increased by a factor of 100. The results also clearly indicate that the oxygenation pattern improves disproportionally with increasing environmental pressure.
BACKGROUND: Inspiratory hyperoxia reduces tumor hypoxia, which is responsible for limited radiosensitivity of tumors. However, very little is known about the heterogeneity of intratumoral oxygenation during this supportive treatment. The study analyzes whether local hypoxia is still present during normobaric and hyperbaric inspiratory hyperoxia and whether the addition of CO2 to the inspiratory gas affects the spatial pO2 distribution. MATERIAL AND METHODS:Tumor oxygenation of experimental DS-sarcomas in rats was assessed by polarographic needle electrodes at 1 and 2 atm (bar) environmental pressure during pure O2 or carbogen (95 % O2 + 5 % CO2) breathing. Up to 320 individual pO2 measurements were performed in a strictly oriented grid resulting in an oxygenation profile in a horizontal tumor layer. RESULTS: In the experimental tumors used the oxygenation showed pronounced heterogeneities with closely adjacent hypoxic and oxygenated regions. This heterogeneity was still visible under normobaric hyperoxia where large confluent hypoxic regions were detectable. At 1 atm, the addition of CO2 improved tumor oxygenation significantly (at least in large tumors). At 2 atm, only very small local regions of hypoxia were detected. However, under this condition hypercapnia had no impact on tumor oxygenation. CONCLUSIONS: The data show that even under hyperbaric hyperoxia, hypoxic regions are detectable despite the average pO2 increased by a factor of 100. The results also clearly indicate that the oxygenation pattern improves disproportionally with increasing environmental pressure.
Authors: Ken-ichiro Matsumoto; Marcelino Bernardo; Sankaran Subramanian; Peter Choyke; James B Mitchell; Murali C Krishna; Martin J Lizak Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Huagang Hou; Ruhong Dong; Hongbin Li; Benjamin Williams; Jean P Lariviere; S K Hekmatyar; Risto A Kauppinen; Nadeem Khan; Harold Swartz Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2011-10-01 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: J Bussink; J H Kaanders; P F Rijken; J P Peters; R J Hodgkiss; H A Marres; A J van der Kogel Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: P Workman; E O Aboagye; F Balkwill; A Balmain; G Bruder; D J Chaplin; J A Double; J Everitt; D A H Farningham; M J Glennie; L R Kelland; V Robinson; I J Stratford; G M Tozer; S Watson; S R Wedge; S A Eccles Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-05-25 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Yao Ding; Ralph P Mason; Roderick W McColl; Qing Yuan; Rami R Hallac; Robert D Sims; Paul T Weatherall Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-06-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Ana Belén Herrera-Campos; Esteban Zamudio-Martinez; Daniel Delgado-Bellido; Mónica Fernández-Cortés; Luis M Montuenga; F Javier Oliver; Angel Garcia-Diaz Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 6.575