Siân A Pugh1, Bethany Shinkins, Alice Fuller, Jane Mellor, David Mant, John N Primrose. 1. *University Surgery, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom†Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom‡Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe patterns of recurrence and postrecurrence survival in a large cohort of accurately staged patients with Dukes' A-C colorectal cancer. BACKGROUND:Recurrence remains a frequent cause of mortality after the treatment of colorectal cancer with curative intent. Understanding the likelihood and site of recurrence informs adjuvant treatment and follow-up. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of data from the FACS (follow-up after colorectal cancer surgery) trial after a median 4.4 years of follow-up; postrecurrence survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Complete data were available for 94% of patients; 189 (17%) patients had experienced recurrence. Incidence of recurrence varied according to the site of the primary (right colon: 51/379, 14%; left colon: 68/421, 16%; rectum: 70/332, 21%; P = 0.023) and initial stage (Dukes' A: 26/249, 10%; Dukes' B: 81/537, 15%; Dukes' C: 82/346, 24%; P < 0.0001). Pulmonary recurrence was most frequently associated with rectal tumors, and multisite/other recurrence with right-sided colonic tumors. Recurrences from lower-stage tumors were more likely to be treatable with curative intent (Dukes' A: 13/26, 50%; Dukes' B: 32/81, 40%; Dukes' C: 20/82, 24%; P = 0.03). Those with rectal tumors benefited most from follow-up (proportion with treatable recurrence: rectum 30/332, 9%; left colon 23/421, 6%; right colon 12/379, 3%; P = 0.003). Both initial stage (log rank P = 0.005) and site of primary (log rank P = 0.01) influenced postrecurrence survival. CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood and site of recurrence, and survival, are influenced by the site and stage of the primary tumor. Those with rectal cancers benefited most from follow-up.ISRCTN 41458548.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To describe patterns of recurrence and postrecurrence survival in a large cohort of accurately staged patients with Dukes' A-C colorectal cancer. BACKGROUND: Recurrence remains a frequent cause of mortality after the treatment of colorectal cancer with curative intent. Understanding the likelihood and site of recurrence informs adjuvant treatment and follow-up. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of data from the FACS (follow-up after colorectal cancer surgery) trial after a median 4.4 years of follow-up; postrecurrence survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Complete data were available for 94% of patients; 189 (17%) patients had experienced recurrence. Incidence of recurrence varied according to the site of the primary (right colon: 51/379, 14%; left colon: 68/421, 16%; rectum: 70/332, 21%; P = 0.023) and initial stage (Dukes' A: 26/249, 10%; Dukes' B: 81/537, 15%; Dukes' C: 82/346, 24%; P < 0.0001). Pulmonary recurrence was most frequently associated with rectal tumors, and multisite/other recurrence with right-sided colonic tumors. Recurrences from lower-stage tumors were more likely to be treatable with curative intent (Dukes' A: 13/26, 50%; Dukes' B: 32/81, 40%; Dukes' C: 20/82, 24%; P = 0.03). Those with rectal tumors benefited most from follow-up (proportion with treatable recurrence: rectum 30/332, 9%; left colon 23/421, 6%; right colon 12/379, 3%; P = 0.003). Both initial stage (log rank P = 0.005) and site of primary (log rank P = 0.01) influenced postrecurrence survival. CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood and site of recurrence, and survival, are influenced by the site and stage of the primary tumor. Those with rectal cancers benefited most from follow-up.ISRCTN 41458548.
Authors: John N Primrose; Siân A Pugh; Gareth Thomas; Matthew Ellis; Karwan Moutasim; David Mant Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2021-01 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Suguru Yamashita; Kristoffer Watten Brudvik; Scott E Kopetz; Dipen Maru; Callisia N Clarke; Guillaume Passot; Claudius Conrad; Yun Shin Chun; Thomas A Aloia; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: S Mokhles; F Macbeth; V Farewell; F Fiorentino; N R Williams; R N Younes; J J M Takkenberg; T Treasure Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: John M Creasy; Kristen M Cunanan; Jayasree Chakraborty; John C McAuliffe; Joanne Chou; Mithat Gonen; Victoria S Kingham; Martin R Weiser; Vinod P Balachandran; Jeffrey A Drebin; T Peter Kingham; William R Jarnagin; Michael I D'Angelica; Richard K G Do; Amber L Simpson Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-09-20 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Jiao Yang; Xiang Lin Du; Shu Ting Li; Bi Yuan Wang; Yin Ying Wu; Zhe Ling Chen; Meng Lv; Yan Wei Shen; Xin Wang; Dan Feng Dong; Dan Li; Fan Wang; En Xiao Li; Min Yi; Jin Yang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 3.240