Literature DB >> 26135678

Epidemiology and Prevention of Postsurgical Adhesions Revisited.

Richard P G ten Broek1, Erica A Bakkum, Cornelis J H Mvan Laarhoven, Harry van Goor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive review of recent epidemiologic data on the burden of adhesion-related complications and adhesion prevention. Second, we elaborate on economic considerations for the application of antiadhesion barriers.
BACKGROUND: Because the landmark SCAR studies elucidated the impact of adhesions on readmissions for long-term complications of abdominal surgery, adhesions are widely recognized as one of the most common causes for complications after abdominal surgery. Concurrently, interest in adhesion prevention revived and several new antiadhesion barriers were developed. Although these barriers have now been around for more than a decade, adhesion prevention is still seldom applied.
METHODS: The first part of this article is a narrative review evaluating the results of recent epidemiological studies on adhesion-related complications and adhesion prevention. In part II, these epidemiological data are translated into a cost model of adhesion-related complications and the potential cost-effectiveness of antiadhesion barriers is explored.
RESULTS: New epidemiologic data warrant a shift in our understanding of the socioeconomic burden of adhesion-related complications and the indications for adhesion prevention strategies. Increasing evidence from cohort studies and systematic reviews shows that difficulties during reoperations, rather than small bowel obstructions, account for the majority of adhesion-related morbidity. Laparoscopy and antiadhesion barriers have proven to reduce adhesion formation and related morbidity. The direct health care costs associated with treatment of adhesion-related complications within the first 5 years after surgery are $2350 following open surgery and $970 after laparoscopy. Costs are about 50% higher in fertile-age female patients. Application of an antiadhesion barriers could save between $328 and $680 after open surgery. After laparoscopy, the costs impact ranges from $82 in expenses to $63 of savings.
CONCLUSIONS: Adhesions are an important cause for long-term complications in both open and laparoscopic surgery. Adhesiolysis during reoperations seems to impact adhesion-related morbidity most. Routine application of antiadhesion barriers in open surgery is safe and cost-effective. Application of antiadhesion barriers can be cost-effective in selected cases of laparoscopy. More research is needed to develop barriers suitable for laparoscopic use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26135678     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  16 in total

Review 1.  Common Functional Gastroenterological Disorders Associated With Abdominal Pain.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Subhankar Chakraborty; Christopher D Sletten
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Bioorthogonal Radiopaque Hydrogel for Endoscopic Delivery and Universal Tissue Marking.

Authors:  Seonki Hong; Jonathan Carlson; Hakho Lee; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-12-20       Impact factor: 9.933

3.  Barrier materials for prevention of surgical adhesions: systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Gerard Waldron; Conor Judge; Laura Farina; Aoife O'Shaughnessy; Martin O'Halloran
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-05-02

4.  An Arthroscopy-Assisted Mini-Invasive Technique to Create a Chronic Rabbit Model With Massive and Retracted Supraspinatus Rotator Cuff Tears.

Authors:  Junjie Xu; Kang Han; Wei Su; Jinzhong Zhao
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-05-11

5.  A Novel Method for Evaluating Postoperative Adhesions in Rats.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Bove; Susan L Chapelle; Eleanor Boyle; David J Mokler; Jan Hartvigsen
Journal:  J Invest Surg       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 2.533

6.  Does robotic rectal cancer surgery improve the results of experienced laparoscopic surgeons? An observational single institution study comparing 168 robotic assisted with 184 laparoscopic rectal resections.

Authors:  Rogier M P H Crolla; Paul G Mulder; George P van der Schelling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Risk factors for future repeat abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Chema Strik; Martijn W J Stommel; Laura J Schipper; Harry van Goor; Richard P G Ten Broek
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Utility of the sliding lung sign for the prediction of preoperative intrathoracic adhesions.

Authors:  Takahiro Homma; Toshihiro Ojima; Yutaka Yamamoto; Yoshifumi Shimada; Yushi Akemoto; Naoya Kitamura; Naoki Yoshimura
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Post-Surgical Peritoneal Scarring and Key Molecular Mechanisms.

Authors:  Sarah E Herrick; Bettina Wilm
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-05-05

10.  In-hospital costs of an admission for adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Pepijn Krielen; Barend A van den Beukel; Martijn W J Stommel; Harry van Goor; Chema Strik; Richard P G Ten Broek
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.