Literature DB >> 26135043

Patents for Toll-like receptor ligands as radiation countermeasures for acute radiation syndrome.

Vijay K Singh1,2, Harvey B Pollard3.   

Abstract

Acute radiation exposure induces apoptosis of tissues in the hematopoietic, digestive, cutaneous, cardiovascular and nervous systems; extensive apoptosis of these tissues ultimately leads to acute radiation syndrome. A novel strategy for developing radiation countermeasures has been to imitate the genetic mechanisms acquired by radiation-resistant tumors. Two mechanisms that underlie this ability of tumor cells are the p53 and NF-κB pathways. The loss of p53 function results in the inactivation of pro-apoptotic control mechanisms, while constitutive activation of NF-κB results in the up-regulation of anti-apoptotic genes. Various Toll-like receptor ligands are capable of up regulating the NF-κB pathway, which increases radio-resistance and reduces radiation-induced apoptosis in various tissues. Several Toll-like receptor ligands have been patented and are currently under development as radiation countermeasures for acute radiation syndrome. Ongoing studies suggest that a few of these attractive agents are progressing well along the US FDA approval pathway to become radiation countermeasures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NF-κB; Toll-like receptor ligands; acute radiation syndrome; radiation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26135043      PMCID: PMC4673515          DOI: 10.1517/13543776.2015.1064900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Pat        ISSN: 1354-3776            Impact factor:   6.674


Introduction

Due to the increasing prevalence of radioactive material, incidences involving radiation exposure, either intended or unintended, are an undeniable possibility with potentially catastrophic consequences [1]. Such concerns have justified substantial efforts to develop medically effective radiation countermeasures for ARS [2,3]. Although such efforts were initiated > 6 decades ago, only one radiation countermeasure, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), has recently been approved by the US FDA for ARS [4,5]. Countermeasures can be categorized based on their administration in relation to the time of radiation exposure. Radioprotectors, also called prophylactic agents, must be administered before radiation exposure to prevent injury by acting prior to and during the initial radiochemical events. Radiation mitigators are administered after irradiation but before the appearance of overt evidence of injury to accelerate recovery. Radiation therapeutics or treatments are the agents given after symptoms manifest to stimulate repair or regeneration of organ and tissue functions [2]. High-dose whole-body irradiation induces inflammation, massive apoptosis, necrosis, and susceptibility to infection. All three leukocyte populations (lymphocytes, monocytes, and granulocytes) fall within a few days after exposure, reaching their respective nadirs in several days. Other blood cell populations (e.g., erythrocytes, platelets) decline slowly over a several-week-long period due to reduced hematopoietic activity with the exception of granulocytes. Cellular determinants of the adaptive immune response are significantly more sensitive than the majority of components of innate immunity (e.g., macrophage populations and natural killer cells) with the exception of granulocytes. However, significant decline in neutrophils (neutropenia) increases the risk and severity of infections [6,7]. Effective protection from irradiation requires the defense of existing mature immune cells and the rescue of precursor and stromal cells as both are essential for regeneration and recovery. Relative sensitivity also varies greatly among different tissue components [8]. Mature B- and T-cells are the most sensitive to irradiation and will undergo apoptosis after exposure to < 1 Gy, whereas hematopoietic precursors are significantly more resistant and can regenerate the immune system even after exposure to 10 Gy in mice. Bone marrow stroma is the most resistant component of immune system, which can survive exposure to level as high as 15 – 17 Gy, although functional alterations can be observed at lower doses.

Biological responses to radiation

Exposure to ionizing radiation produces breaks and cross-links in the DNA, and alters proteins, cell membranes, and other macromolecular structures. Ionizing radiation also induces secondary damage to the cellular components by creating free radicals and reactive oxygen species (ROS). Several pathways protect and restore the integrity of the DNA. For example, antioxidant chemicals and enzymes scavenge the free radicals and ROS in addition to reducing the levels of oxidized proteins and lipids. Cellular checkpoint systems detect DNA defects and delay cell cycle progression until the damage is repaired, the cell commits to permanent growth arrest, or the cell initiates programmed death (apoptosis). At the organismal level, the immediate effects of low- and moderate-intensity radiation are largely caused by cell death, necrosis, or by the bystander effect. These effects cause radiation-induced inflammation [9-11]. At high doses, lethality is caused by the hematopoietic and gastrointestinal radiation syndromes (H-ARS and GIS, respectively). H-ARS is the loss of blood cells and their progenitors, which makes it impossible to regenerate the blood and lymphoid systems. This process leads to death from hemorrhage, anemia and infection. GIS is caused by massive cell death in the intestinal epithelium, predominantly in the small intestine, followed by disintegration of the intestinal wall and death from bacteremia and sepsis. Another important syndrome of radiation exposure is cutaneous syndrome. Exposure of the human skin to ionizing radiation > 3 Gy results in a distinct clinical representation, characterized by a transient and faint erythema after a few hours, and then followed by severe erythema, blistering, and necrosis.

Role of NF-κB in radiation-induced apoptosis

The important radioprotective strategy is to activate the NF-κB pathway. The protective role of NF-κB is mediated by the transcriptional activation of genes coding for proteins that block major apoptotic pathways [12]. The NF-κB pathway makes an attractive target because it is activated by several naturally occurring factors that are considered radioprotectants. Sources of NF-κB activators include tumor cells and microbial parasites of mammals, since both employ inhibition of apoptosis for survival in the host. The idea of using NF-κB pathway induction to inhibit apoptosis was initially tested using Salmonella typhimurium flagellin, which activates NF-κB through Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5) (Figure 1) [13]. NF-κB regulates anti-apoptotic genes especially the TNF receptor-associated factor 1 and 2 (TRAF1 and TRAF2) and, therefore, checks the activities of the caspase enzyme family, which are central to most apoptotic processes. Bacterial lipoproteins are ligands for TLR2 which also activate NF-κB. The immunomodulatory properties of lipoproteins and their effects on hematopoietic cytokines make small synthetic lipopeptides excellent candidates as radiation countermeasures. Consequently, several patents have been filed for different TLR ligands for development as candidate radiation countermeasures (Table 1) [14-26].
Figure 1.

Schematic representation of TLR-ligand-mediated NF-κB activation. TLRs bind microbial PAMPs leading to the activation of NF-κB and IRF pathways. Activation of these pathways is mediated by the two key adaptor molecules MyD88 and TRIF. NF-κB enters the nucleus where it ‘turns on’ the expression of specific genes resulting in inflammatory, immune, or cell survival response. Key biological effects of NF-κB activation include the prevention of apoptosis. A set of endosomal TLRs recognize nucleic acids derived from viruses and endogenous nucleic acids.

Table 1.

Promising TLR ligands under development as radiation countermeasures.

Agents (examples)ReceptorsDocument titlePending applicationsPatent numberRef.
Flagellin or flagellin derivatives (CBLB502)TLR5Modulating apoptosis US7638485B2, US8106005B2[14]
Method for screening modulators of apoptosis US8784840B2[14]
Method for reducing the effects of chemotherapy using flagellin-related polypeptidesUS 20130324462A1, WO2009102818A1US8580321B2[15]
Methods of protecting against radiation using flagellinWO2005056042A2 [17]
Flagellin related polypeptides and uses thereofWO2006069198A1US8007812B2, US8287882B2, US8932609B2, US8871215B2, JP5285278B2[16]
Lipopeptides of mucoplasma origin (CBLB612 and CBLB613)TLR2 or TLR2/6Methods of protecting against apoptosis using lipopeptidesNZ565063A, MX2007015834A, KR20140041874A, KR20080030566A, WO2008111585A1, WO2006138238A3, IL188091A, HK1123495A1, CA2612102A1, BRPI0611586A2, EA200702510A1US8008260B2, US8524668B2, EP1904084B1, EA014644 B1, CN101242852B, AU2006259630B2, JP5000644B2, ES2421447T3, US9006183B2[23,24]
Compositions and methods comprising TLR stimulating agents for prophylaxis and therapy for damage to dermal epitheliumEP2833876 A1, WO2013151994A1 [18]
Use of TLR agonist for treating cancerUS20140248260A1,SG191830A1, MX2013007967A, KR20140030132A, JP2014502973A, EP2663367A4, EA201390843A1, CO6781506A2, CN103476458A, CL2013002001A1, CA2824438A1, AU2012205681A1, WO2012097012A1 [25,26]
Methods for increasing and mobilizing hematopoietic stem cellsUS20140045747A1, ZA200905378A, SG177959A1,NZ603805A, NZ578928A, MX2009007391A, KR20090108703A,IL199766A, HK1134835A1,EP2115124 A2, EA200900806A1, CA2675032A1, BRPI0806557A2, AU2008204836A1, WO2008086426A3JP5389666B2, EA018983B1, CN101631850B[21,22]
α-1-antitrypsinTLR2Peptides and methods for using the sameUS20130274187A1, MX2014007799A, EP2802338A2, CA2859777A1, AU2013208293A1, WO2013106273A3 [19,20]

One citation has been provided for each ‘simple patent family’ or patent that has been published at different times or with multiple countries.

TLR: Toll-like receptor.

Schematic representation of TLR-ligand-mediated NF-κB activation. TLRs bind microbial PAMPs leading to the activation of NF-κB and IRF pathways. Activation of these pathways is mediated by the two key adaptor molecules MyD88 and TRIF. NF-κB enters the nucleus where it ‘turns on’ the expression of specific genes resulting in inflammatory, immune, or cell survival response. Key biological effects of NF-κB activation include the prevention of apoptosis. A set of endosomal TLRs recognize nucleic acids derived from viruses and endogenous nucleic acids. IRAK: IL-1-receptor-associated kinase; IRF: IFN regulatory factor; MyD88: Myeloid differentiation primary-response protein 88; PAMPs: Pathogen-associated molecular patterns; TIR: Toll-IL-1 receptor: TIRAP: TIR domain-containing adaptor protein; TLR: Toll-like receptor; TRAF6: TNF-receptor-associated factor-6; TRIF: TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β. Promising TLR ligands under development as radiation countermeasures. One citation has been provided for each ‘simple patent family’ or patent that has been published at different times or with multiple countries. TLR: Toll-like receptor.

Toll-like receptors and activation of NF-κB

TLRs are the key sensor elements of innate immunity and are evolutionary conserved receptors. They are homologues of the Drosophila Toll protein which is important for the defense against microbial infection. TLRs recognize highly conserved structural motifs known as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) (exclusively expressed by microbial pathogens) or damage/danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) (endogenous molecules released from necrotic or dying cells). Stimulation of TLRs, by PAMPs and DAMPs, initiates signaling cascades which lead to the activation of transcription factors, such as NF-κB (Figure 1). TLR signaling results in a variety of cellular responses including the production of interferons, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and effector cytokines that direct the adaptive immune response. A total of 10 human and 12 murine TLRs have been well characterized (Table 2).
Table 2.

Well characterized TLRs of mouse and human.

TLRsLigandExpressing cellsLocationAdapter(s)
TLR1Bacterial lipoprotein: triacyl lipopeptidesMonocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, B-cellsCell surfaceTIRAP, MyD88
TLR2Bacterial peptidoglycans: lipoproteins, lipoteichoic acidMonocytes, macrophages, mast cells, B-cellsCell surfaceTIRAP, MyD88
TLR3Viruses: double stranded RNA (poly I:C), tRNA, siRNAB-cells, T-cells, natural killer cellsEndosomesTRIF
TLR4Bacteria and host cells: LPSB-cells, T-cells, natural killer cells, dendritic cells Cell surface/endosomesTRAM, TRIF, TIRAP, MyD88
TLR5Bacteria: bacterial flagellinMonocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, intestinal epitheliumCell surfaceMyD88
TLR6Mycoplasma: lipoproteinMonocytes, macrophages, mast cells, B-cellsCell surfaceTIRAP, MyD88
TLR7RNA viruses: ssRNAEndosomes, monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, B cellsEndosomesMyD88
TLR8Small synthestic compounds: ssRNAMonocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, mast cellsEndosomesMyD88
TLR9Bacteria and DNA viruses: CpG DNA (CpG ODNs)Monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, B-cells, T-cellsEndosomesMyD88
TLR10Profiling-like proteinsMonocytes, macrophages, dendritic cellsEndosomesMyD88

TLR1 through TLR10 are human and TLR1 through TLR9, TLR11, TLR12, and TLR13 are murine (homologue of TLR 10 being a pseudogene). Murine TLR11, TLR12, and TLR13 are still being characterization and therefore not displayed in this table.

CpG ODN: CpG oligodeoxynucleotides; MyD88: Myeloid differentiation primary-response protein 88; LPS: Lipopolysaccharides; poly I/C: Polyinosinic/polycytidylic acid; ssRNA: Single-stranded RNA; siRNA: Small interfering RNA; TIR: Toll-IL-1 receptor; TIRAP: TIR domain-containing adaptor protein; TLR: Toll-like receptor; TRAM: TRIF-related adaptor molecule; TRIF: TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β; tRNA: Transfer RNA.

Well characterized TLRs of mouse and human. TLR1 through TLR10 are human and TLR1 through TLR9, TLR11, TLR12, and TLR13 are murine (homologue of TLR 10 being a pseudogene). Murine TLR11, TLR12, and TLR13 are still being characterization and therefore not displayed in this table. CpG ODN: CpG oligodeoxynucleotides; MyD88: Myeloid differentiation primary-response protein 88; LPS: Lipopolysaccharides; poly I/C: Polyinosinic/polycytidylic acid; ssRNA: Single-stranded RNA; siRNA: Small interfering RNA; TIR: Toll-IL-1 receptor; TIRAP: TIR domain-containing adaptor protein; TLR: Toll-like receptor; TRAM: TRIF-related adaptor molecule; TRIF: TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β; tRNA: Transfer RNA. Consistent with their function of immunocyte activation, TLRs are expressed in spleen and peripheral blood leukocytes. Other TLR-specific patterns are expressed in other lymphoid organs and subsets of leukocytes as well as other tissues and organs. TLR ligands are appealing as potential radioprotectors since they are characteristic of large groups of pathogens, and cannot be easily mutated. Unlike cytokines, many PAMPs have little effect besides activating TLRs and thus are unlikely to produce side effects. Many PAMPs (and DAMPs) are constantly present in humans. Several TLR ligands are under different stages of the development as radiation countermeasures (Table 3).
Table 3.

Promising TLR ligands under development as radiation countermeasures for ARS.

AgentsOriginReceptorsEfficacyAnimal model of evaluationComments
CBLB502Truncated flagellin of Salmonella typhimuriumTLR5Radioprotector and radiomitigatorMurine and nonhuman primates (cytokines also evaluated in canines)Has US FDA investigational new drug status, pre-emergency use authorization application may be submitted soon
CBLB612Mycoplasma origin, small lipopeptideTLR2Radioprotector, marginal radiomitigative potentialMurineA radioprotector and is also a mobilizer of hematopoietic stem cells
CBLB613Mycoplasma origin, small lipopeptideTLR2/6Radioprotector, marginal radiomitigative potentialMurineRadioprotective dose reduction factor in mouse is 1.25
SP16α-1-antitrypsinTLR2Not yet tested for acute radiation syndrome in animal modelNot applicableBeing investigated for several indications, including endotoxemia, following acute radiation exposure

TLR: Toll-like receptor.

Promising TLR ligands under development as radiation countermeasures for ARS. TLR: Toll-like receptor.

Development of TLR ligands as radiation countermeasures

Flagellin of Salmonella typhimurium is a stable protein and natural activator of NF-κB which has been shown to protect mice from lethal doses of total-body irradiation. A truncated version of this protein has been developed (CBLB502) which retains the radioprotective efficacy and stability while lacking its immunogenic properties. CBLB502 has been found to be effective against both H-ARS and GIS in mice and nonhuman primates (NHPs), both as a radioprotector and also as a radiomitigator [27,28]. These attributes make CBLB502 uniquely useful as a radiation countermeasure for civilian and military applications. CBLB502 has received FDA investigational new drug status and is currently in clinical development. A human safety study indicated that it was well tolerated in humans and the biomarker results correspond to data from animal models [28]. A shortened version of a naturally occurring N-terminal lipopeptide from Mycoplasma arginine, R-Pam2-CGETDK (S-[(2R)-2,3-bis(palmitoyloxy)propyl]-cysteinyl-GETDK) (CBLB613), is water soluble, activates TLR2/TLR6-dependent NF-κB production, and demonstrates significant radioprotective efficacy in murine model of ARS [29]. Mycoplasma arginine is a symbiotic asymptomatic microflora of mammals, commonly present in humans and is expected to be safe. A synthetic mimetic of diacylated mycoplasma lipopeptides (Pam2-CSKKKK, agonists of TLR2, CBLB612) has also been shown to have radioprotective and radiomitigative efficacy in murine model of ARS [30]. The TLR agonists are activators of anti-apoptosis pathways and their role in carcinogenesis deserves investigation. Although the role of TLRs in cancer is not well understood, results suggest a dual role of TLRs in cancer: high doses of TLR agonists appear to have an anti-cancer effect whereas low doses of TLR agonists promote cancer growth [31].

Expert opinion

Currently, G-CSF is the only one FDA-approved countermeasure to mitigate ARS-related morbidity and mortality. It has been procured for Strategic National Stockpile for use in a radiological emergency. However, the adverse consequences of G-CSF administration need to be taken into consideration. For examples, G-CSF administration after cytotoxic agents that damage bone marrow stem cells exacerbates long-term stem cell damage through excessive differentiation stimulation [5]. Additional concerns stem from its role in exacerbating delayed lung damage in an animal model of ARS. Finally, in a recent study, G-CSF failed to demonstrate radiomitigative efficacy in the NHP model. This failure may be due to the lack of supportive care [5]. It is important to note that the European standard for the evaluation and treatment of ARS recommends the use of cytokines 14 – 21 d post-exposure to promote hematological reconstruction, and there are several studies in which G-CSF has been used for the treatment of radiation accident victims with beneficial effects [5,32,33]. Fortunately, there are several promising radiation countermeasures for ARS at different stages of development [2]. In the recent past, several patents have been filed for the use of TLR ligands as radiation countermeasures, specifically as anti-apoptotic agents. Among these products, CBLB502 (truncated flagellin) and lipopeptides of mycoplasma origin are promising agents. CBLB502 is the leading candidate currently under development, as this agent has been evaluated as a radioprotector as well as a radiomitigator with promising results in NHPs. A good laboratory practice compliant study with CBLB502 has also been conducted in NHPs. In addition, this agent has undergone clinical trial for toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and biomarkers in healthy volunteers. Its existing efficacy, safety data, and animal-to-human dose conversion are enough to proceed with a pre-emergency use authorization (EUA) application to reduce the risk of death following radiation exposure. In our opinion, CBLB502 holds the most promise for the future due to its limited side effects and studies indicate it is likely to be a safe and effective agent when approved. CBLB612 and CBLB613 are at early stages of development and their promising efficacy in a murine model has been reported [29,30]. However these peptides, along with CBLB502, are derived from human pathogens/symbionts (Salmonella and Mycoplasma), pre-existing immunity in the host may be an issue. Efforts are, therefore, being made to identify hyperthermophilic flagellin derivatives to which the human immune system has not yet been exposed. These derivatives are also stable, have a relatively low molecular weight and can be incorporated with de-immunizing deletions and mutations.
  17 in total

1.  Dose and dose rate effects of whole-body proton-irradiation on lymphocyte blastogenesis and hematological variables: part II.

Authors:  Michael J Pecaut; Daila S Gridley; Anna L Smith; Gregory A Nelson
Journal:  Immunol Lett       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 3.685

Review 2.  NF-kappaB at the crossroads of life and death.

Authors:  Michael Karin; Anning Lin
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 25.606

3.  The innate immune response to bacterial flagellin is mediated by Toll-like receptor 5.

Authors:  F Hayashi; K D Smith; A Ozinsky; T R Hawn; E C Yi; D R Goodlett; J K Eng; S Akira; D M Underhill; A Aderem
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Animal models for acute radiation syndrome drug discovery.

Authors:  Vijay K Singh; Victoria L Newman; Allison N Berg; Thomas J MacVittie
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 6.098

Review 5.  Radiation-induced alterations in cytokine production by skin cells.

Authors:  Kerstin Müller; Viktor Meineke
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Medical management of the acute radiation syndrome: recommendations of the Strategic National Stockpile Radiation Working Group.

Authors:  Jamie K Waselenko; Thomas J MacVittie; William F Blakely; Nicki Pesik; Albert L Wiley; William E Dickerson; Horace Tsu; Dennis L Confer; C Norman Coleman; Thomas Seed; Patrick Lowry; James O Armitage; Nicholas Dainiak
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  An agonist of toll-like receptor 5 has radioprotective activity in mouse and primate models.

Authors:  Lyudmila G Burdelya; Vadim I Krivokrysenko; Thomas C Tallant; Evguenia Strom; Anatoly S Gleiberman; Damodar Gupta; Oleg V Kurnasov; Farrel L Fort; Andrei L Osterman; Joseph A Didonato; Elena Feinstein; Andrei V Gudkov
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Colony-stimulating factors for the treatment of the hematopoietic component of the acute radiation syndrome (H-ARS): a review.

Authors:  Vijay K Singh; Victoria L Newman; Thomas M Seed
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.861

9.  New approach to radiation burn treatment by dosimetry-guided surgery combined with autologous mesenchymal stem cell therapy.

Authors:  J J Lataillade; C Doucet; E Bey; H Carsin; C Huet; I Clairand; J F Bottollier-Depois; A Chapel; I Ernou; M Gourven; L Boutin; A Hayden; C Carcamo; E Buglova; M Joussemet; T de Revel; P Gourmelon
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.806

10.  Biologics as countermeasures for acute radiation syndrome: where are we now?

Authors:  Vijay K Singh; Patricia L P Romaine; Victoria L Newman
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.388

View more
  2 in total

1.  Mannan oligosaccharide requires functional ETC and TLR for biological radiation protection to normal cells.

Authors:  Sweta Sanguri; Damodar Gupta
Journal:  BMC Cell Biol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 2.  Medical countermeasures for unwanted CBRN exposures: part II radiological and nuclear threats with review of recent countermeasure patents.

Authors:  Vijay K Singh; Patricia L P Romaine; Victoria L Newman; Thomas M Seed
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Pat       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 6.674

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.