Literature DB >> 26134716

Differences in activity of actinoporins are related with the hydrophobicity of their N-terminus.

Uris Ros1, Wendy Rodríguez-Vera1, Lohans Pedrera1, Pedro A Valiente1, Sheila Cabezas1, María E Lanio1, Ana J García-Sáez2, Carlos Alvarez3.   

Abstract

Actinoporins are pore-forming toxins (PFT) produced by sea anemones with molecular mass around 20 kDa and high affinity for sphingomyelin. The most studied atinoporins are sticholysins I and II (StI/StII) from Stichodactyla helianthus, equinatoxin II (EqtII) from Actinia equina, and fragaceatoxin C (FraC) from Actinia fragacea. Their N-terminal sequences encompassing residues 1-30 seem to be the best candidates for pore formation. This segment comprises an amphipathic α-helix preceded by a more or less hydrophobic segment, depending on the toxin, of around 10 amino acid residues. Although it is clear that the N-terminal is the most variable sequence in this protein family, the role of their hydrophobic segment in not fully understood. Here we show a comparison of StI, StII, EqtII, and FraC activities with that of their respective N-terminal synthetic peptides. The hemolytic and permeabilizing activity of the peptides reproduce qualitatively the behavior of their respective parental proteins and are particularly related to the hydrophobicity of the corresponding 1-10 segment. Furthermore, the dendrogram analysis of actinoporins' N-terminal sequence allows relating differences in alignment with differences in activity among the four toxins. We have also evaluated the penetration depth of the N-terminal segment of StI and StII by using Trp-containing peptide-analogs. Our data suggest that the N-terminus of StII is more deeply buried into the hydrophobic core of the bilayer than that of StI. We hypothesize that the highest activity of StII could be ascribed to a larger hydrophobic continuum, an uninterrupted sequence of non-charged mainly hydrophobic amino acid residues, of its N-terminus promoting a highest ability to partially insert in the membrane core. Moreover, as we show for four related peptides that a higher hydrophobicity contributes to increase the activity, we reinforce the notion that this property must be taken into account to design new potent membranotropic agents.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. and Société Française de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire (SFBBM). All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Actinoporin; Hemolytic activity; Peptide–membrane interaction; Permeabilizing activity; Pore-forming toxins

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26134716     DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2015.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochimie        ISSN: 0300-9084            Impact factor:   4.079


  9 in total

1.  Disrupting a key hydrophobic pair in the oligomerization interface of the actinoporins impairs their pore-forming activity.

Authors:  Haydeé Mesa-Galloso; Karelia H Delgado-Magnero; Sheila Cabezas; Aracelys López-Castilla; Jorge E Hernández-González; Lohans Pedrera; Carlos Alvarez; D Peter Tieleman; Ana J García-Sáez; Maria E Lanio; Uris Ros; Pedro A Valiente
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Membrane Remodeling by the Lytic Fragment of SticholysinII: Implications for the Toroidal Pore Model.

Authors:  Haydee Mesa-Galloso; Pedro A Valiente; Mario E Valdés-Tresanco; Raquel F Epand; Maria E Lanio; Richard M Epand; Carlos Alvarez; D Peter Tieleman; Uris Ros
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Biophysical and biochemical strategies to understand membrane binding and pore formation by sticholysins, pore-forming proteins from a sea anemone.

Authors:  Carlos Alvarez; Uris Ros; Aisel Valle; Lohans Pedrera; Carmen Soto; Yadira P Hervis; Sheila Cabezas; Pedro A Valiente; Fabiola Pazos; Maria E Lanio
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2017-08-29

4.  Synergistic Action of Actinoporin Isoforms from the Same Sea Anemone Species Assembled into Functionally Active Heteropores.

Authors:  Esperanza Rivera-de-Torre; Sara García-Linares; Jorge Alegre-Cebollada; Javier Lacadena; José G Gavilanes; Álvaro Martínez-Del-Pozo
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Actinoporins: From the Structure and Function to the Generation of Biotechnological and Therapeutic Tools.

Authors:  Santos Ramírez-Carreto; Beatriz Miranda-Zaragoza; Claudia Rodríguez-Almazán
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-04-02

6.  Multigene Family of Pore-Forming Toxins from Sea Anemone Heteractis crispa.

Authors:  Elena Leychenko; Marina Isaeva; Ekaterina Tkacheva; Elena Zelepuga; Aleksandra Kvetkina; Konstantin Guzev; Margarita Monastyrnaya; Emma Kozlovskaya
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 5.118

7.  Lipid interactions of an actinoporin pore-forming oligomer.

Authors:  Aliasghar Sepehri; Binod Nepal; Themis Lazaridis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Evolution of the Cytolytic Pore-Forming Proteins (Actinoporins) in Sea Anemones.

Authors:  Jason Macrander; Marymegan Daly
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 4.546

9.  Dissecting the mechanism of action of actinoporins. Role of the N-terminal amphipathic α-helix in membrane binding and pore activity of sticholysins I and II.

Authors:  Gustavo P B Carretero; Eduardo F Vicente; Eduardo M Cilli; Carlos M Alvarez; Håvard Jenssen; Shirley Schreier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.