| Literature DB >> 26134529 |
Feng Li1, Lianlian Zhu2, Yonghong Xie2, Li Jiang2, Xinsheng Chen2, Zhengmiao Deng2, Baihan Pan2.
Abstract
In this paper, the effect of plant density, sediment type, and macrophyte fragment size on the fragment colonization ability of Myriophyllum spicatum was evaluated in an outdoor experiment. The relative growth rate (RGR) was higher in the mud and low-density treatments than in the sand and high-density treatments. The relative elongation rate (RER) decreased with increasing density and fragment size, with RER values being much higher in the mud than the sand treatments. Both branching number and shoot diameter increased with decreasing density and increasing fragment size, and were significantly higher in the mud than the sand treatments. The shoot : root ratio was higher in the mud treatments than in the sand treatments. Total N content in both the shoot and root was significantly higher in the mud and low-density treatments than in the sand and high-density treatments. Shoot P content only decreased with increasing density, while root P content was higher in the mud and low-density treatments than in the sand and high-density treatments. These data indicate that fragment colonization by M. spicatum is improved by large fragments, low density, and nutrient-rich sediments, and that these conditions contribute to the rapid population expansion of this species.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26134529 PMCID: PMC4488764 DOI: 10.1038/srep11821
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Summary of three – way ANOVAs for relative growth rate, relative elongation rate, biomass allocation, branching number, shoot diameter, total N content, and total P content in the shoot and root of Myriophyllum spicatum with different fragment size growing in two densities and two sediment types (F-values).
| Variables | n | Sediment type (S) | Fragment size (F) | Density (D) | S×F | S×D | D×F | S×D×F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relative growth rate (g g−1 day−1) | 5 | 0.239[ | 2.402[ | 2.411[ | 1.212[ | |||
| Relative elongation rate (cm cm−1 day−1) | 5 | 1.688 [ | 0.028 [ | 2.167 [ | ||||
| Branching number | 5 | 2.862[ | 2.457 [ | |||||
| Shoot diameter (cm) | 5 | 0.533[ | 0.332[ | 1.201 [ | ||||
| Shoot : root mass | 5 | 2.488[ | 1.754[ | 0.092[ | 1.093[ | 0.317[ | 0.132[ | |
| Shoot N (mg g−1) | 5 | 3.895[ | 0.133[ | 2.387[ | 0.209[ | |||
| Root N (mg g−1) | 5 | 0.746[ | 0.677[ | 1.393[ | 0.405[ | |||
| Shoot P (mg g−1) | 5 | 0.001[ | 1.791[ | |||||
| Root P (mg g−1) | 5 |
NSP > 0.05; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 1Relative growth rate (means ± SE, n = 5) and relative elongation rate (means ± SE, n = 5) of Myriophyllum spicatum with different fragment size growing in two densities and two sediment types.
Figure 2Branching number (means ± SE, n = 5) and shoot diameter (means ± SE, n = 5) of Myriophyllum spicatum with different fragment size growing in two densities and two sediment types.
Figure 3Biomass allocation (means ± SE, n = 5) of Myriophyllum spicatum with different fragment size growing in two densities and two sediment types.
Figure 4Total N contents (means ± SE, n = 5) in the shoot and root of Myriophyllum spicatum with different fragment size growing in two densities and two sediment types.
Figure 5Total P contents (means ± SE, n = 5) in shoot and root of Myriophyllum spicatum with different fragment size growing in two densities and two sediment types.