Literature DB >> 26134465

Peripheral Nerve Repair: Multimodal Comparison of the Long-Term Regenerative Potential of Adipose Tissue-Derived Cells in a Biodegradable Conduit.

Elisabeth A Kappos1,2, Patricia E Engels1,2, Mathias Tremp1,2, Moritz Meyer zu Schwabedissen1,2, Pietro di Summa3, Arne Fischmann4, Stefanie von Felten5, Arnaud Scherberich6, Dirk J Schaefer1, Daniel F Kalbermatten1,2.   

Abstract

Tissue engineering is a popular topic in peripheral nerve repair. Combining a nerve conduit with supporting adipose-derived cells could offer an opportunity to prevent time-consuming Schwann cell culture or the use of an autograft with its donor site morbidity and eventually improve clinical outcome. The aim of this study was to provide a broad overview over promising transplantable cells under equal experimental conditions over a long-term period. A 10-mm gap in the sciatic nerve of female Sprague-Dawley rats (7 groups of 7 animals, 8 weeks old) was bridged through a biodegradable fibrin conduit filled with rat adipose-derived stem cells (rASCs), differentiated rASCs (drASCs), human (h)ASCs from the superficial and deep abdominal layer, human stromal vascular fraction (SVF), or rat Schwann cells, respectively. As a control, we resutured a nerve segment as an autograft. Long-term evaluation was carried out after 12 weeks comprising walking track, morphometric, and MRI analyses. The sciatic functional index was calculated. Cross sections of the nerve, proximal, distal, and in between the two sutures, were analyzed for re-/myelination and axon count. Gastrocnemius muscle weights were compared. MRI proved biodegradation of the conduit. Differentiated rat ASCs performed significantly better than undifferentiated rASCs with less muscle atrophy and superior functional results. Superficial hASCs supported regeneration better than deep hASCs, in line with published in vitro data. The best regeneration potential was achieved by the drASC group when compared with other adipose tissue-derived cells. Considering the ease of procedure from harvesting to transplanting, we conclude that comparison of promising cells for nerve regeneration revealed that particularly differentiated ASCs could be a clinically translatable route toward new methods to enhance peripheral nerve repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26134465     DOI: 10.1089/scd.2014.0424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells Dev        ISSN: 1547-3287            Impact factor:   3.272


  12 in total

Review 1.  Targeted stimulation of MSCs in peripheral nerve repair.

Authors:  Femke Mathot; Alexander Y Shin; Andre J Van Wijnen
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 2.  Augmenting Peripheral Nerve Regeneration with Adipose-Derived Stem Cells.

Authors:  Liangfu Jiang; Thomas Mee; Xijie Zhou; Xiaofeng Jia
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 5.739

3.  Functional Outcomes of Nerve Allografts Seeded with Undifferentiated and Differentiated Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Rat Sciatic Nerve Defect Model.

Authors:  Femke Mathot; Tiam M Saffari; Nadia Rbia; Tim H J Nijhuis; Allen T Bishop; Steven E R Hovius; Alexander Y Shin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 5.169

Review 4.  Stem Cell Transplantation for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: Current Options and Opportunities.

Authors:  Liangfu Jiang; Salazar Jones; Xiaofeng Jia
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Collagen Type I Conduits for the Regeneration of Nerve Defects.

Authors:  Silvan Klein; Jody Vykoukal; Oliver Felthaus; Thomas Dienstknecht; Lukas Prantl
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Epineural adipose-derived stem cell injection in a sciatic rodent model.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Kappos; Patricia Baenziger-Sieber; Mathias Tremp; Patricia E Engels; Sarah Thommen; Lima Sprenger; Robyn M Benz; Dirk J Schaefer; Stefan Schaeren; Daniel Felix Kalbermatten
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.708

7.  Bioactive Nanofiber-Based Conduits in a Peripheral Nerve Gap Management-An Animal Model Study.

Authors:  Tomasz Dębski; Ewa Kijeńska-Gawrońska; Aleksandra Zołocińska; Katarzyna Siennicka; Anna Słysz; Wiktor Paskal; Paweł K Włodarski; Wojciech Święszkowski; Zygmunt Pojda
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Validity and reliability of the CatWalk system as a static and dynamic gait analysis tool for the assessment of functional nerve recovery in small animal models.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Kappos; Patricia K Sieber; Patricia E Engels; Alessio V Mariolo; Salvatore D'Arpa; Dirk J Schaefer; Daniel F Kalbermatten
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 2.708

9.  The role of undifferentiated adipose-derived stem cells in peripheral nerve repair.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Joseph M Rosen
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 5.135

10.  Gene expression and growth factor analysis in early nerve regeneration following segmental nerve defect reconstruction with a mesenchymal stromal cell-enhanced decellularized nerve allograft.

Authors:  Nadia Rbia; Liselotte F Bulstra; Patricia F Friedrich; Allen T Bishop; Tim H J Nijhuis; Alexander Y Shin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.