PURPOSE: To assess the performance of (1→3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) and Candida albicans germ tube antibody (CAGTA) for the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis (IC) in a prospective cohort of 107 unselected, non-neutropenic ICU patients. METHODS: BDG (cutoff positivity ≥80 pg/mL) and CAGTA (cutoff positivity ≥1/160) assays were performed twice a week. Confounding factors included amoxicillin-clavulanate and piperacillin-tazobactam treatments, recent surgery, Gram-positive bloodstream infection, renal replacement therapy, and enteral nutrition. Patients were classified as neither colonized nor infected (n = 29), Candida spp. colonization (n = 63) (low grade, n = 32; high grade, n = 31), and invasive candidiasis (IC) (n = 15). RESULTS: BDG levels were higher in patients with IC and high-grade colonization than in the remaining groups (p = 0.012), and two consecutive measurements ≥80 pg/mL discriminated IC from the remaining groups (sensitivity 80%, specificity 75.7%). For the discrimination between IC and Candida spp. colonization, the AUC for the maximum value of BDG was 0.667 (95% CI 0.544-0.790) and for the maximum value of CAGTA 0.545 (95% CI 0.395-0.694). Significant changes of BDG and CAGTA kinetics in IC patients treated with antifungals were not observed. In patients neither colonized nor infected or with low-grade Candida spp. colonization, none of the confounding factors was associated with a significant increase in BDG positivity. CONCLUSIONS: Two consecutive BDG levels ≥80 pg/mL allowed discrimination among IC and high-grade colonization. Systemic antifungal therapy could not be monitored with biomarker kinetics, and BDG levels were not subject to interference by confounding factors in either colonized or infected patients or with low-grade colonization.
PURPOSE: To assess the performance of (1→3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) and Candida albicans germ tube antibody (CAGTA) for the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis (IC) in a prospective cohort of 107 unselected, non-neutropenic ICUpatients. METHODS:BDG (cutoff positivity ≥80 pg/mL) and CAGTA (cutoff positivity ≥1/160) assays were performed twice a week. Confounding factors included amoxicillin-clavulanate and piperacillin-tazobactam treatments, recent surgery, Gram-positive bloodstream infection, renal replacement therapy, and enteral nutrition. Patients were classified as neither colonized nor infected (n = 29), Candida spp. colonization (n = 63) (low grade, n = 32; high grade, n = 31), and invasive candidiasis (IC) (n = 15). RESULTS:BDG levels were higher in patients with IC and high-grade colonization than in the remaining groups (p = 0.012), and two consecutive measurements ≥80 pg/mL discriminated IC from the remaining groups (sensitivity 80%, specificity 75.7%). For the discrimination between IC and Candida spp. colonization, the AUC for the maximum value of BDG was 0.667 (95% CI 0.544-0.790) and for the maximum value of CAGTA 0.545 (95% CI 0.395-0.694). Significant changes of BDG and CAGTA kinetics in IC patients treated with antifungals were not observed. In patients neither colonized nor infected or with low-grade Candida spp. colonization, none of the confounding factors was associated with a significant increase in BDG positivity. CONCLUSIONS: Two consecutive BDG levels ≥80 pg/mL allowed discrimination among IC and high-grade colonization. Systemic antifungal therapy could not be monitored with biomarker kinetics, and BDG levels were not subject to interference by confounding factors in either colonized or infected patients or with low-grade colonization.
Authors: O Albert; D Toubas; C Strady; J Cousson; C Delmas; V Vernet; I Villena Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2011-04-10 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Cristóbal León; Sergio Ruiz-Santana; Pedro Saavedra; Beatriz Galván; Armando Blanco; Carmen Castro; Carina Balasini; Aránzazu Utande-Vázquez; Francisco J González de Molina; Miguel A Blasco-Navalproto; Maria J López; Pierre Emmanuel Charles; Estrella Martín; María Adela Hernández-Viera Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Matteo Bassetti; Jose Garnacho-Montero; Thierry Calandra; Bartjan Kullberg; George Dimopoulos; Elie Azoulay; Arunaloke Chakrabarti; Daniel Kett; Cristobal Leon; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Jean-Francois Timsit; Malcom D Richardson; Andrew Shorr; Oliver A Cornely Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-03-02 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Chadi A Hage; Eva M Carmona; Oleg Epelbaum; Scott E Evans; Luke M Gabe; Qusay Haydour; Kenneth S Knox; Jay K Kolls; M Hassan Murad; Nancy L Wengenack; Andrew H Limper Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Gennaro De Pascale; Brunella Posteraro; Sonia D'Arrigo; Giorgia Spinazzola; Rita Gaspari; Giuseppe Bello; Luca Maria Montini; Salvatore Lucio Cutuli; Domenico Luca Grieco; Valentina Di Gravio; Giulia De Angelis; Riccardo Torelli; Elena De Carolis; Mario Tumbarello; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Massimo Antonelli Journal: Crit Care Date: 2020-09-05 Impact factor: 9.097