Literature DB >> 26134280

Reaching women where they are: eliminating the initial in-person medical abortion visit.

Elizabeth G Raymond1, Daniel Grossman2, Ellen Wiebe3, Beverly Winikoff4.   

Abstract

The requirement that every woman desiring medical abortion must come in person to a clinical facility to obtain the drugs is a substantial barrier for many women. To eliminate this requirement in the United States, two key components of the standard initial visit would need to be restructured. First, alternatives to ultrasound and pelvic exam would need to be identified for ensuring that gestational age is within the limit for safe and effective treatment. This is probably feasible: for example, data from a large study suggest that in selected patients menstrual history is highly sensitive for this purpose. Second, the Food and Drug Administration would need to remove the medically unwarranted restriction on distribution of mifepristone. These two changes could allow provision of the service by a broader range of providers in nontraditional venues or even by telemedicine. Such options could have profound benefits in reducing cost and expanding access to abortion.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26134280     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  8 in total

1.  Telemedicine and medical abortion: dispelling safety myths, with facts.

Authors:  Roopan Gill; Wendy V Norman
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2018-02-01

2.  Remote Delivery in Reproductive Health Care: Operation of Direct-to-Patient Telehealth Medication Abortion Services in Diverse Settings.

Authors:  Anna E Fiastro; Sajal Sanan; Elizabeth Jacob-Files; Elisa Wells; Francine Coeytaux; Molly R Ruben; Ian M Bennett; Emily M Godfrey
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.707

3.  Self-management of first trimester medical termination of pregnancy: a qualitative study of women's experiences.

Authors:  C Purcell; S Cameron; J Lawton; A Glasier; J Harden
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Commentary: No-test medication abortion: A sample protocol for increasing access during a pandemic and beyond.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Raymond; Daniel Grossman; Alice Mark; Ushma D Upadhyay; Gillian Dean; Mitchell D Creinin; Leah Coplon; Jamila Perritt; Jessica M Atrio; DeShawn Taylor; Marji Gold
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Changes to medication abortion clinical practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Mary Tschann; Elizabeth S Ly; Sara Hilliard; Hannah L H Lange
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Determination of medical abortion eligibility by women and community health volunteers in Nepal: A toolkit evaluation.

Authors:  Kathryn Andersen; Mary Fjerstad; Indira Basnett; Shailes Neupane; Valerie Acre; Sharad Kumar Sharma; Emily Jackson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  First trimester medication abortion practice in the United States and Canada.

Authors:  Heidi E Jones; Katharine O'Connell White; Wendy V Norman; Edith Guilbert; E Steve Lichtenberg; Maureen Paul
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Women's experiences of a telemedicine abortion service (up to 12 weeks) implemented during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: a qualitative evaluation.

Authors:  N Boydell; J J Reynolds-Wright; S T Cameron; J Harden
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 7.331

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.