Literature DB >> 26133913

Patterns of Care for Localized Breast Cancer in Oklahoma, 2003-2006.

Janis E Campbell1, Amanda E Janitz1, Sara K Vesely1, Dana Lloyd2, Anne Pate3.   

Abstract

Despite well-established clinical guidelines for breast cancer treatment, Standard of Care (SOC) is not universal in the U.S. The purpose of this study was to describe the extent to which patients receive guideline-based, stage-specific treatments for localized female breast cancer in Oklahoma. Data were obtained from the Oklahoma Central Cancer Registry for the period 2003-2006. We included localized, invasive female breast cancers and analyzed both treatment and demographic factors. We used the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) treatment guidelines to determine SOC. Among women who received breast conserving surgery (BCS), we used logistic regression to evaluate factors related to SOC. In Oklahoma, 92 percent of the 4,177 localized breast cancer patients were treated with recognized SOC. In women aged ≥65 years with BCS, those ≥75 years had a lower adjusted odds of meeting SOC than did those without insurance, with comorbid conditions, or whose comorbid status was unknown. Among women aged <65 years, those with Medicare/Medicaid, Medicare only, or without insurance, along with comorbid conditions, had a lower adjusted odds of meeting SOC. Overall, 92 percent of women met SOC. Factors such as age, insurance type, and comorbid conditions were associated with meeting SOC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oklahoma; breast cancer; localized; standard of care

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26133913      PMCID: PMC4746725          DOI: 10.1080/03630242.2015.1061095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Health        ISSN: 0363-0242


  53 in total

1.  Racial differences in breast cancer survival in the Detroit Metropolitan area.

Authors:  Michael S Simon; Mousumi Banerjee; Heather Crossley-May; Fawn D Vigneau; Anne-Michelle Noone; Kendra Schwartz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Reducing disparities in breast cancer care: a daunting but essential responsibility.

Authors:  Rachel A Freedman; Eric P Winer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Review of methods used to measure comorbidity in cancer populations: no gold standard exists.

Authors:  Diana Sarfati
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Survival disadvantage among Medicaid-insured breast cancer patients treated with breast conserving surgery without radiation therapy.

Authors:  Kristie Long Foley; Gretchen Kimmick; Fabian Camacho; Edward A Levine; Rajesh Balkrishnan; Roger Anderson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Patterns of care with regard to surgical choice and application of adjuvant radiation therapy for preinvasive and early stage breast cancer in rural Appalachia.

Authors:  Andrew B Freeman; Bin Huang; Anthony E Dragun
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.339

6.  Disparities in breast cancer treatment and survival for women with disabilities.

Authors:  Ellen P McCarthy; Long H Ngo; Richard G Roetzheim; Thomas N Chirikos; Donglin Li; Reed E Drews; Lisa I Iezzoni
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Social and racial differences in selection of breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy regimens.

Authors:  Jennifer J Griggs; Eva Culakova; Melony E S Sorbero; Marek S Poniewierski; Debra A Wolff; Jeffrey Crawford; David C Dale; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Undertreatment strongly decreases prognosis of breast cancer in elderly women.

Authors:  Christine Bouchardy; Elisabetta Rapiti; Gérald Fioretta; Paul Laissue; Isabelle Neyroud-Caspar; Peter Schäfer; John Kurtz; André-Pascal Sappino; Georges Vlastos
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-08-11       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Survival after lumpectomy and mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer: the effect of age and hormone receptor status.

Authors:  E Shelley Hwang; Daphne Y Lichtensztajn; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Barbara Fowble; Christina A Clarke
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Health system correlates of receipt of radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery: a study of low-income Medicaid-enrolled women.

Authors:  Roger T Anderson; Gretchen G Kimmick; Fabian Camacho; J Timothy Whitmire; Carol Dickinson; Edward A Levine; Frank M Torti; Rajesh Balkrishnan
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.229

View more
  3 in total

1.  Five-Year Cancer Survival Rates in Oklahoma from 1997 to 2008.

Authors:  Janis Campbell; Krupa Gandhi; Anne Pate; Amanda Janitz; Amber Anderson; Robin Kinnard; Kai Ding
Journal:  J Okla State Med Assoc       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

2.  Cancer among American Indians - Identifying Priority Areas in Oklahoma.

Authors:  Sydney A Martinez; Amanda E Janitz; Julie Erb-Alvarez; Dana S Mowls; Janis E Campbell; Tom Anderson
Journal:  J Okla State Med Assoc       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

Review 3.  Surgical Services for Breast Cancer Patients in Australia, is There a Gap for Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander Women?

Authors:  Elzerie de Jager; Ronny Gunnarsson; Yik-Hong Ho
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 3.352

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.