Literature DB >> 26133893

Teaching Conflict: Professionalism and Medical Education.

K J Holloway1.   

Abstract

Resistance by physicians, medical researchers, medical educators, and medical students to pharmaceutical industry influence in medicine is often based on the notion that physicians (guided by the ethics of their profession) and the industry (guided by profit) are in conflict. This criticism has taken the form of a professional movement opposing conflict of interest (COI) in medicine and medical education and has resulted in policies and guidelines that frame COI as the problem and outline measures to address this problem. In this paper, I offer a critique of this focus on COI that is grounded in a broader critique of neo-liberalism, arguing it individualizes the relationship between physicians and industry, too neatly delineates between the two entities, and reduces the network of social, economic, and political relations to this one dilemma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conflict of interest; Medical education; Neo-liberalism; Pharmaceutical industry; Professionalism

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26133893     DOI: 10.1007/s11673-015-9648-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioeth Inq        ISSN: 1176-7529            Impact factor:   1.352


  17 in total

Review 1.  Medicalization and pharmaceuticalization at the intersections: Looking backward, sideways and forward.

Authors:  Susan E Bell; Anne E Figert
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  How do disclosure policies fail? Let us count the ways.

Authors:  Inmaculada de Melo-Martín; Kristen Intemann
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Industry-sponsored clinical research: a broken system.

Authors:  Marcia Angell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Managing conflicts of interest in clinical care: a national survey of policies at U.S. medical schools.

Authors:  Susan Chimonas; Lisa Patterson; Victoria H Raveis; David J Rothman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Pharmaceutical industry support and residency education: a survey of internal medicine program directors.

Authors:  Laura L Loertscher; Andrew J Halvorsen; Brent W Beasley; Eric S Holmboe; Joseph C Kolars; Furman S McDonald
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-02-22

6.  Canadian faculties of medicine not in denial.

Authors:  Nick Busing
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Coming Soon to a Physician Near You: Medical Neoliberalism and Pharmaceutical Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Jill A Fisher
Journal:  Harvard Health Policy Rev       Date:  2007

8.  Medical students' exposure to and attitudes about drug company interactions: a national survey.

Authors:  Frederick S Sierles; Amy C Brodkey; Lynn M Cleary; Frederick A McCurdy; Matthew Mintz; Julia Frank; D Joanne Lynn; Jason Chao; Bruce Z Morgenstern; William Shore; John L Woodard
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Uneasy subjects: medical students' conflicts over the pharmaceutical industry.

Authors:  Kelly Holloway
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Too few, too weak: conflict of interest policies at Canadian medical schools.

Authors:  Adrienne Shnier; Joel Lexchin; Barbara Mintzes; Annemarie Jutel; Kelly Holloway
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.